See >>38745
I notice that my ID has changed since last bread, so I will digitally sign this post again like I did in >>38692 using https://ed25519-dsa.github.io/. Since the public key is the same, my identity is confirmed across breads. Just one use of digital signatures.
Public key: SqCFJ8wPWrY7dKbZwl5XggHUchr8arn3Pqtx7NHCxeE=
Signature: zifKAc1suy62Up4WD8BSIm7s6YB4bc8I1ArgKxDjcKruTPWHMMbqnnDLY+s4RWkuvm8aUytB9vTw1ma+BZfdBg==
>Notables don't get into qresear.ch until they are baked, and so can't be used for digs.
I just checked qresear.ch and could not find QRB on the notables tab. For that matter, QRB breads #49 and #50 don't seem to be indexed in the search yet. Something's wrong.
The new border wall being climbed over.
This post on QR referencing QRB >>>/qresearch/7444907
was made notable on QR here >>>/qresearch/7444907
Good to see.
Correction:
This post on QR referencing QRB >>>/qresearch/7444907
was made notable on QR here >>>/qresearch/7445097
Good to see.
Q drop 3654 is stunning. Q is implying that as of 19 November, Q had foreknowledge of the US shootings that occurred on each of the first six days of December: [D][1-6]. (Can we assume that the series ends there? We'll see.)
This reinforces the already strong case that Q has precise knowledge of future events. In Q drop 3585 we are given a hint as to how this might be possible:
''Project Looking Glass?
Going Forward in Order to Look Back.''
Anons are aware that Project Looking Glass is rumored advanced technology capable of acquiring information from the future. If Q has such technology, it could explain his many statements like:
How many coincidences before it becomes mathematically impossible?
Nothing can stop what is coming.
As if Q has been gradually preparing us to accept the reality of Looking Glass technology and that the view of the future it gives is, according to Q, locked in.
But I don't believe that the future is predetermined. Instead, whatever information is acquired about "the future", either through technology or through psychic ability, is about a probable future, not a certain future. Probabilities can change as a result of free choice. A negative timeline can be avoided with adequate warning and a positive timeline can be reinforced by the desire for it or the belief in it, as encouraged by a positive vision.
There have been many visions throughout history of an apocalyptic end time that would occur in our times. I believe those seers, such as Nostradamus, viewed what was for them the most probable future at the time. However, perhaps as a result of those very visions, humanity is choosing to avoid catastrophe. We have crossed the 2012 marker and now the Q team is steering us toward a bright future (Q drop 2450):
A beautiful brave new world lies ahead.
Q's task may not be as easy as it may seem. What if the dark forces also have a Looking Glass? Then it is still a chess match, just on a meta level. I recommend the movie The Adjustment Bureau, based on a Philip K. Dick short story and starring Matt Damon and Emily Blunt. The "adjusters" have a mysterious book that shows alternate probable futures and it's their job to make adjustments to steer events toward a desired outcome. They are thwarted by a couple's desire to be together regardless of the adjusters' plan. They fought for the future they desired.
The point is that the future is not locked in and Q alone cannot bring about the "beautiful brave new world". Q can guide us like a captain at the tiller but we provide the power in the sails with our passion. Our ship is in a time storm and the captain need all hands on deck. WWG1WGA.
Q has repeatedly written:
You have more than you know.
Consider that what we have, that we are not fully aware of, is not only information but power, the power of our conscious intent fueled by passion and guided by truth.
Q gave what might have been a hint about Project Looking glass very early in Q drop 9:
Through the looking glass
At the time it seemed an obvious reference to Lewis Carroll's book Alice through the Looking-Glass. The looking-glass (or mirror) in the book was a portal to a realm where nothing is quite what it seems. But there is also a connection to time.
Carl Jung, who introduced the concept of synchronicity, cited a quote from the book as one of his favorites: “It’s a poor sort of memory that only works backwards”. The White Queen was explaining to Alice that her memory worked in both directions of time.
In physics, there is no preferred direction of time on the microscopic scale. And quantum physics, applicable on that scale, tells us that alternate probable future timelines emanate from the present moment. This should also apply to the past: alternate probable past timelines converge on the present moment.
In other words, the present moment, the Eternal Now, has a fluid past/future context that shifts as it is witnessed by consciousness. Conventional physics assumes that the shifts happen stochastically according to a probability distribution determined by the laws of physics and it does indeed do that when the witnessing is passive, lacking intention. But metaphysicians and especially parapsychologists now know that conscious intent can influence stochastic processes, shifting the probabilities, even of the past. Q may be hinting at the bidirectional nature of time in drop 3585:
Project Looking Glass? Going Forward in Order to Look Back.
The Q team (including us) might actually be changing the past of the future. We are in the Days of Future Past.
Maybe Q repeatedly prompting us to expand your thinking is asking us to reconsider what we believe is possible. As the White Queen said, Why, sometimes I’ve believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast.
Intent has power to shape reality. Humanity has long been like a giant botnet running malware written by a few "elite" hackers who have made our intent, their intent. The Q/Patriot movement is doing what was recently done by the French government when they recently hijacked and neutralized a massive cryptocurrency mining botnet controlling close to a million infected computers:
https://techcrunch.com/2019/09/01/police-botnet-takedown-infections/
We are hijacking and neutralizing the elite's program, freeing humanity to intend a beautiful brave new world.
>IMO, Looking Glass technology is basically an artificial form of a function that can be cultivated naturally, once human beings realize the vast potential of human consciousness. This is the Great Awakening.
>Human consciousness trumps artificial consciousness every time.
Absolutely. That Q may be relying on technology concerns me. I prefer to avoid a transhuman/technocratic timeline in favor of an organic/natural timeline.
New Ukrainian leader heads to high-stakes meeting with Putin
https://apnews.com/bc2a3c682e607907a2719b311ca0329a
Although it's biased, this AP article from a few days ago has some background information helpful for understanding what's at stake in tomorrow's meeting (9 December) in Paris between leaders of Ukraine, Russia, France and Germany intended to resolve the conflict in eastern Ukraine.
What gives me cause for pessimism is that there is no representation at this meeting of the two Donbass republics that have declared themselves to be independent, so I doubt that this meeting will have any greater effect than the meetings in 2014 in Normandy and Minsk. That is, unless Lugansk and Donetsk are not really independent but instead are actually subordinate to Russia.
I read somewhere that Russia views Donbass as the anti-anti-Russia. It specifically wants a lack of resolution. It could have allowed Donbass to be retaken by Ukraine or it could have taken Donbass itself. But a stalemate serves Russia's interests best. Russia understands the Western strategy of creating an anti-state to oppose its enemy, for example Taiwan is a US-supported "anti-China" and the US intended to make Ukraine "anti-Russia". Russia counters by making Donbass "anti-Ukraine" which is really "anti-anti-Russia". Russia can then just patiently wait. Time is on Russia's side and not on the side of the US and especially Ukraine. Meanwhile Russia is reducing US's time by dumping the dollar, buying gold, and create alternatives to the US-controlled SWIFT payment system.
But I doubt Donbass see's itself as a pawn of Russia. For a window into Donbass, I have been following Russel "Texas" Bentley, an American who moved to Donbass to help fight for its independence and is now a citizen of DPR (Donetsk People's Republic). He sees himself as a patriot of his adopted Republic and feels that he speaks for it when he writes:
>Furthermore, the people and defenders of the Republics will never, ever, allow the return of Ukraine government or military on our land. Laws and promises and treaties aside, it would be actual suicide for us to do so, on a Rwandan scale, as well as the absolute betrayal of the heroism, sacrifice and suffering we have undertaken and endured for the last five years. So, as I have said before, The Donbass Republics will never return to Ukraine, but there is a possibility that someday Ukraine will return to us, and to Mother Russia. It is literally the Ukraine's only hope.
http://www.russelltexasbentley.com/2019/10/the-recent-big-news-about-zelensky.html
Here's a little story to bake your noodle:
Right now the Q team is viewing this reality from a probable past that is different from the one that we perceive as our past. Q likes our past better than that present. So Q makes a cryptic drop referencing a marker in our present. The act of doing so, when witnessed by the millions that make up the Q collective consciousness of that timeline, causes the collective to jump to our timeline. So, here we are.
It's remarkable how this story has been obscured by the Western media even though it is easily verifiable. As an example of real journalism, the Canadian independent journalist actually traveled to Crimea to learn for herself the story from the Crimean's viewpoint:
Return to Russia: Crimeans Tell the Real Story of the 2014 Referendum and Their Lives Since
Eva Bartlett traveled to Crimea to see firsthand out how Crimeans have fared since 2014 when their country reunited with Russia, and what the referendum was really like.
https://www.mintpressnews.com/return-russia-crimea-story-referendum-lives-since/262247/
Pictures to go with Eva Bartlett's article about Crimea.
Transfer of Crimea to Ukraine in 1954
It was Krushchev who was behind the transfer of Crimea to the Ukrainian SSR from the Russian SSR in 1954. There is a rumor promoted by Kissinger that he was drunk at the time, but there are other factors:
> Sergei Khrushchev, Khrushchev's son, claimed that the decision was due to the building of a hydro-electric dam on the Dnieper River and the consequent desire for all the administration to be under one body. Sevastopol in Crimea being the site of the Soviet Black Sea Fleet, a quintessential element of Russian and then of Soviet foreign policy, the transfer had the intended effect of binding Ukraine inexorably to Russia, "Eternally Together", as a poster commemorating the event of 1954 proclaimed.
> The transfer was described by some of the Supreme Soviet as a gift to commemorate the 300th anniversary of the Treaty of Pereyaslav in 1654 when the Cossack Rada apparently decided to unify with Muscovy, putting in place the eventual acquisition of Ukraine by Russia. Other reasons given were the integration of the economies of Ukraine and Crimea and the idea that Crimea was a natural extension of the Ukrainian steppes.
> There was also a desire to repopulate parts of the Crimea which had suffered large-scale expulsions of its native Tatars to Central Asia in 1944.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1954_transfer_of_Crimea#Complications_of_the_%22personal_gesture%22
I vacationed in Crimea several times in the years before 2014. It was clear that most Crimeans were very pro-Russia. I don't see how the West could not have known. One Victory Day in Sevastopol in 2013, I watched a parade with long lines of Russian military vehicles and Russian sailors from the Russian naval base (see picture, taken by me). There were huge crowds of locals cheering them and waving Russian flags. Near the waterfront was located a Russian naval museum and a statue of Catherine the Great. I took a picture of the Russian Cruiser Moskva passing it on a ferry crossing Sevastopol Bay (see picture).
Locals were upset by things Kiev did to them such as requiring that only the Ukrainian language be used in cinemas when nearly everyone spoke Russian. One taxi driver had a sign in his taxi: Only Russian spoken. I'm sure he wasn't alone. Since the fall of the Soviet Union, The Autonomous Republic of Crimea had petitioned several times to rejoin Russia and had been refused, until the events of 2014.
Some more real journalism in Ukraine from OAN (One America News Network)
OAN’s Chanel Rion Gives Debriefing On Ukraine Trip
https://www.oann.com/oans-chanel-rion-gives-debriefing-on-ukraine-trip/
As part of her OAN Investigates exclusive, One America's Chanel Rion flew to Europe to talk to additional witnesses. These officials claimed to have evidence proving DNC collusion and criminal activity by the Bidens. Here's her summary of the trip and a preview into Part III of her series.
"Undeniable Evidence": Explosive Classified Docs Reveal Afghan War Mass Deception
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/unearthed-pentagon-docs-reveal-afghan-war-deception-new-pentagon-papers-moment
> In what's already being hailed as a defining and explosive "Pentagon papers" moment, a cache of previously classified documents obtained by The Washington Post show top Pentagon leaders continuously lied to the public about the "progress" of the now eighteen-year long Afghan war.
> Two major consistent themes from the documents are—the manipulation on a mass scale of statistics fed to the public in order to hide the true disastrous nature of the war; and... US leaders "turning a blind eye" to large scale theft of US tax payer dollars by corrupt Afghan officials.
DOJ Inspector General Releases Report On FBI Conduct, Finds "Clear Abuse" Of FISA Process
DOJ Inspector General Releases Report On FBI Conduct, Finds "Clear Abuse" Of FISA Process
> Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz has released his report into the FBI's investigation of the Trump campaign during the 2016 US election. The report concludes that despite nearly everybody investigating President Trump hating him - and evidence was fabricated by at least one FBI attorney, and they misrepresented Christopher Steele's credentials, none of their bias 'tainted' the investigation, and the underlying process was sound.
> That said, Horowitz faults the FBI for "significant inaccuracies and omissions" in their applications to secretly monitor Trump campaign adviser Carter Page, and agents "failed to meet the basic obligation" to ensure the applications were "scrupulously accurate."
> Attorney General William Barr, meanwhile, says that the report "now makes clear that the FBI launched an intrusive investigation of a U.S. presidential campaign on the thinnest of suspicions that, in my view, were insufficient to justify the steps taken."
> Horowitz also found that the Steele dossier provided "probably cause" to spy on Carter Page, and that the FISA application "drew heavily...upon the Steele reporting to support the government's position that Page" was a Russian agent.
> Rep. Devin Nunes suggested that the DOJ IG report makes clear that "Republican FISA abuse memo from February 2018 was accurate and actually understated the FISA abuse the dirty cops engaged in."
> Something to keep in mind from Rolling Stone's Matt Taibbi: "conservative media will find it damning, while MSNBC/CNN types, if they cover it at all, will call it a nothingburger."
BO
No need to lock bread #50. It is now full.
Yes, bread #50 was filled using a shell script.
Because of the board's flood protection, a new post can only be made from the same IP address about every 90 seconds (maybe less, but more than 60 seconds), so 400 posts takes 10 hours. But it took longer because the Reply form frequently freezes and so manual intervention is required. However, if multiple people were to run the script the time required would be proportionately less.
I'd be happy to share the script but it's designed for Linux.
>His post makes a case for the idea that "looking glass" refers to the "Alice" story by the same name, not the Project Looking Glass related to stargates.
>Thoughts?
His conclusion was:
> All signs point to the looking glass being a reference to the book and not an Area 51 project.
This statement is not credible. How can Q's mention of "Project Looking Glass" in Q3585 be interpreted as pointing away from Area 51 and toward Lewis Carroll's book? Yet that is his claim.
Certainly Q's use of "Through the looking glass." in Q9 was a direct reference to the book and only a very few would have considered it a subtle hint about timelines at the time. But Q3585 is quite direct and shines a new light on Q9 as well as many other Q references as mentioned above in
>But anyone doing a digg in this area is going to run into a problem saucing their work. NONE of the sauce will seem ok to the general public. And within the UFO field, what is "good sauce" to one faction will seem like "bad sauce" to another. If I were digging in that field, I'd with Dr. Michael Salla. But it's a real quagmire.
Your concern about about saucing this subject for the benefit of the public is valid, but there may be no adequate solution.
Some things, like UFOs are considered to be too much for the public to handle (Q2222 Highest classification). So the agencies have a massive disinformation program to cloud and discredit the subject. Meanwhile, they permit soft disclosure through, for example, science fiction movies, to gradually condition the public. E.T. was released close to 40 years ago yet only now is the public ready to accept the existence of biological life elsewhere than Earth. I expect that will accepted scientifically in the next few years, but it may take another decade before the public can accept intelligent live elsewhere and maybe a generation or more before the public is ready for actual contact.
The thing is, readiness for E.T. contact is contingent on humanity maturing and uniting and that must first happen with our Earthly affairs: corruption, poverty, wars, trafficking, environmental degradation, species extinction, etc. The public doesn't need to deal with UFOs/E.T.'s just yet -- it already has a full plate. So Q focuses on the former matters while, I believe, dropping clues to already awakened anons that the Q team is working within a greater context that accounts for sometimes mysterious strategy and timing.
Suppose, for example, that Q can view a probable timeline in which the public is given all the details about the most heinous cabal crimes and knows that humanity cannot handle the full truth (Q586: 60% must remain private [at least] - for humanity.). Some anons are upset about this and believe the public has a right to know; Q does not have a right to conceal the full truth. But what if Q is not just arrogantly presuming to know what is best for humanity, but has actually viewed the consequences of premature full disclosure?
Suppose, for example, that Q has viewed a timeline in which JFK lived longer and because he did, he disclosed the truth about UFOs and E.T.s and that lead to a worldwide catastrophe. Perhaps Q had something to do with guiding humanity to this timeline to give it more time to get its act together, even at the cost of a great man's early death, in this timeline, at least.
I, for one, have more appreciation for the difficult and challenging position Q is in if indeed he has access to Looking Glass technology, or the psychic equivalent. More tolerance and patience as well.
Really insightful summary of the meeting between the "Normandy Four"
Normandy Meeting Confirms Zelensky Has Zero Friends In Europe
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/normandy-meeting-confirms-zelensky-has-zero-friends-europe
> It came as no shock to me that the meeting in Paris of the so-called Normandy Four between the leaders of Ukraine, Russia, Germany and France ended without any breakthroughs.
> So this means, in the end, that Zelensky went to Paris only to find out he still has no friends except the one person he’s not allowed to be friends with, Putin. And that means this situation will grind on without significant movement until the next meeting in March.
I argued above that an Anon's claim that Q's "Project Looking Glass" reference was to the Lewis Carroll book and not to the Area 51 project was not credible. It appears rather to be a direct, unambiguous reference to advanced technology for viewing the future, as challenging as this possibility might be to the world views of some anons, not to mention the general public.
The case that Q is operating from a perspective that not only includes awareness of future probabilities, but also of a secret space program and intelligent life in the cosmos, I suggest is strengthened by the possible references in several Q drops to the Law of One material, so it seems timely to recap a series of posts I made in July on this subject:
>>19735 /pb
>>20420 /pb
>>21723 /pb
>>21727 /pb
>>21731 /pb
>>22852 /pb
>>22909 /pb
The references involved are less direct than the "Project Looking Glass" reference, understandably so considering that the material they may reference is even more esoteric. As I mentioned above, Q may not be addressing the general pubic and does not necessarily expect anons to find indisputable factual evidence for the public's benefit, but may be addressing those already open to esoteric matters. When it comes to expanded consciousness, on the one hand it may not be possible to correlate claims with the mainstream knowledge base, but on the other hand it is always possible to expand one's own consciousness and gain direct personal experience of various esoteric phenomena.
For example, it is very possible to experience the fluid, shifting, bi-directional nature of time personally. To begin with, most people have had the experience of deja vu and synchronicity. The former they may write off as "a glitch in the matrix", the latter as "coincidence". But these are actually direct personal experiences of consciousness expanding, at least momentarily and spontaneously. Deja vu in particular is experiencing the forward arrow of time and the backward arrow of time simultaneously, while synchronicity is a direct experience of the connectedness of all things including moments in time.
Fewer people have had the experience of a lucid dream and fewer still have developed a practice of intentional lucid dreaming. One of the possible experiences in a lucid dream, in addition to the common observation of fluid space in a dream, is the observation of fluid time: one can become acutely aware of the bi-directional nature of time in a lucid dream.
Yet fewer still have had the experience of being lucid while awake, which is the natural outcome of an extensive dreaming practice. In such a state, the bi-directional nature of time becomes obvious and synchronicities and deja vu become commonplace. One operates from a 5-D level of consciousness. To most others, one's movements become mysterious and inexplicable.
Can such experiences be "sauced"? No. How can one explain deja vu to someone who has never experienced it? It would be like trying to explain color to a blind person. Yet those who undertake the difficult task of expanding their own consciousness will be in a position to contribute to Q's plan to bring about a beautiful brave new world in a very direct way, through the power of their conscious intent. Expand your thinking. You have more than you know.
How Trump’s New Anti-Semitism Order Effectively Criminalizes Dissent
Trump’s anti-Semitism bill is unlikely to dampen the flames of hatred towards Jewish Americans or make them feel safer; indeed, outlawing criticism of Israel may have the opposite effect.
https://www.mintpressnews.com/how-trump-new-anti-semitism-bill-criminalizes-dissent/263396/
> President Trump is expected to sign an executive order today purporting to target anti-Semitism on college campuses. However, the measure is understood on all sides as an attempt to outlaw the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement and criticism of Israel more generally.
> The order would mean educational institutions receiving federal money would be subject to losing all funding if the government deems they are not doing enough to stamp out anti-Semitism, which, as the new bill explicitly states, includes critique of the Israeli government.
Good digging you've done.
> DeepMind was creating a god-like AI system that is able to ingest the available public information on the internet and make sense of it. Think of it like Amazon Alexa except much much much more intelligent. This AI system was moved out of the UK I believe and placed into China, and it’s been dubbed the AI Manhattan Project.
I'm reminded of the TV series "Person of Interest" which informed the public about this technology and helped exposed its danger. I hope that people wake up before they become unwitting victims of a global AI as in "The Matrix" film. The possibility of humanity choosing a transhuman/technocratic timeline is very real. This is why I've expressed concern that Q may be over-relying on technology (Project Looking Glass) rather than innate human potential and why I've posted about an alternative way of choosing an organic timeline rather than only information acquisition, analysis and distribution as most anons are engaged in. The latter activity is predominantly a mind-based, rational activity that takes for granted a linear-time, cause-and-effect reality, which may dominate the consciousness leaving innate potentials dormant.
But Q does occasionally invoke biblical passages and anons sometimes offer prayers. Prayer is powerful as is mediation and intention.
http://www.globalloveproject.com/power-of-group-meditation/
> In 1993 a successful experiment was performed in Washington DC in America to demonstrate the effect of a large group of transcendental meditators on crime levels. Researchers predicted in advance that the calming influence of group meditation practice could reduce violent crime by over 20 percent in Washington, D.C., during an 8-week period in the summer of 1993.
In fact, the findings later showed that the rate of violent crime decreased by 23 percent during the June 7 to July 30 experimental period. The odds of this result occurring by chance are less than 2 in 1 billion.
There is also the Global Consciousness project connected with Princeton University which bridges science and metaphysics by observing the effect on random quantum devices spread around the world by major events.
http://noosphere.princeton.edu/
A recent interview of Dr. Nelson, the GCP director: youtube.com/watch?v=wZYeHPk7_kU
> If we make the assumption that all human beings have a latent 'psychic' ability (whether most consciously recognize it or not), then what could be built to tap into a broader section of the population and collect & process the information for analysis?
I am leery of building technology for this purpose when it is not necessary, except maybe for simple devices like random quantum devices that can provide positive feedback to trainees learning to focus their intent. And as you point out,
> Even if it was used on a collection of trained individuals, the sample size would still be a tiny section of the population who are way outside the social norm. That seems archaic to me.
I would rather see many people learn, for example, the protocols (as opposed to technology) of remote viewing, which has been used successfully by the military. See, for example, this PDF of a book by Courtney Brown, Scientific Remote Viewing:
https://farsight.org/SRV/SRVManualByCourtneyBrown.pdf
However, I would emphasize that gathering information about probable futures, besides the inherent flaws in the technology or procedures, is best used to help us see what is possible: negative things to avoid and positive things to intend. It can help us to expand our thinking about what is possible or probable when our imagination is lacking. But our real power is to imagine the best possible reality and, assured that it already exists somewhere in infinity, intend that experience. Thus imagination and creativity should be fostered along with other right-brain functions such as intuition.
Executive Order on Combating Anti-Semitism
Evidently, there was some misreporting about POTUS' new executive order combating anti-semitism, by the NYT and others, that stirred a lot of controversy. So I checked the actual EO on the White House site:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-combating-anti-semitism/
It is actually a rather weak document. It makes no explicit mention of Israel, contrary to some reports. It does not even make Judaism a nationality as many reports claim. It only asserts that the executive branch will enforce Title IV (which only applies to discrimination based on race, religion and nationality but not religion), taking into consideration that the prohibited forms of discrimination might be rooted in anti-semitism. But it makes clear that First Amendment rights shall not be infringed and that no new right or benefit is created.
My guess is that this EO is meant to appease POTUS' Jewish donors, family and friends, and political allies -- including Christian Evangelicals which are a much more significant voting block and more pro-Trump than the smaller and more ambivalent Jewish voting block.
Rudy Giuliani Can Barely Contain Himself Over His Ukraine Findings
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/rudy-giuliani-can-barely-contain-himself-over-his-ukraine-findings
> Upon his return to New York on Saturday, Giuliani says he took a call from President Trump while his plane was still taxiing down the runway, according to the Wall Street Journal.
> "What did you get?" Trump asked. "More than you can imagine," answered the former New York mayor who gained notoriety in the 1980s for taking down the mob as a then-federal prosecutor.
Attached video: "Witnesses have been trying to get this information to us for a year and a half. If we had gotten it earlier, we might have been able to head off the entire Mueller fiasco. They wouldn't give it to anybody else. They had tried to get it to the FBI for the longest time. They had tried to get it to the Justice Department, hired a lawyer and they were rebuffed." -Giuliani
END OF BREAD 000
END OF BREAD 001
END OF BREAD 002
END OF BREAD 003
END OF BREAD 004
END OF BREAD 005
END OF BREAD 006
END OF BREAD 007
END OF BREAD 008
END OF BREAD 009
END OF BREAD 010
END OF BREAD 011
END OF BREAD 012
END OF BREAD 013
END OF BREAD 014
END OF BREAD 015
END OF BREAD 016
END OF BREAD 017
END OF BREAD 018
END OF BREAD 019
END OF BREAD 020
END OF BREAD 021
END OF BREAD 022
END OF BREAD 023
END OF BREAD 024
END OF BREAD 025
END OF BREAD 026
END OF BREAD 027
END OF BREAD 028
END OF BREAD 029
END OF BREAD 030
END OF BREAD 031
END OF BREAD 032
END OF BREAD 033
END OF BREAD 034
END OF BREAD 035
END OF BREAD 036
END OF BREAD 037
END OF BREAD 038
END OF BREAD 039
END OF BREAD 040
END OF BREAD 041
END OF BREAD 042
END OF BREAD 043
END OF BREAD 044
END OF BREAD 045
END OF BREAD 046
END OF BREAD 047
END OF BREAD 048
END OF BREAD 049
END OF BREAD 050
END OF BREAD 051
END OF BREAD 052
END OF BREAD 053
END OF BREAD 054
END OF BREAD 055
END OF BREAD 056
END OF BREAD 057
END OF BREAD 058
END OF BREAD 059
END OF BREAD 060
END OF BREAD 061
END OF BREAD 062
END OF BREAD 063
END OF BREAD 064
END OF BREAD 065
END OF BREAD 066
END OF BREAD 067
END OF BREAD 068
END OF BREAD 069
END OF BREAD 070
==END OF
END OF BREAD 072
END OF BREAD 073
END OF BREAD 074
END OF BREAD 075
END OF BREAD 076
END OF BREAD 077
END OF BREAD 078
END OF BREAD 079
END OF BREAD 080
END OF BREAD 081
END OF BREAD 082
END OF BREAD 083
END OF BREAD 084
END OF BREAD 085
END OF BREAD 086
END OF BREAD 087
END OF BREAD 088
END OF BREAD 089
END OF BREAD 090
END OF BREAD 091
END OF BREAD 092
END OF BREAD 093
END OF BREAD 094
END OF BREAD 095
END OF BREAD 096
END OF BREAD 097
END OF BREAD 098
END OF BREAD 099
END OF BREAD 100
END OF BREAD 101
END OF BREAD 102
END OF BREAD 103
END OF BREAD 104
END OF BREAD 105
END OF BREAD 106
END OF BREAD 107
END OF BREAD 108
END OF BREAD 109
END OF BREAD 110
END OF BREAD 111
END OF BREAD 112
END OF BREAD 113
END OF BREAD 114
END OF BREAD 115
END OF BREAD 116
END OF BREAD 117
END OF BREAD 118
END OF BREAD 119
END OF BREAD 120
END OF BREAD 121
END OF BREAD 122
END OF BREAD 123
END OF BREAD 124
END OF BREAD 125
END OF BREAD 126
END OF BREAD 127
END OF BREAD 128
END OF BREAD 129
END OF BREAD 130
END OF BREAD 131
END OF BREAD 132
END OF BREAD 133
END OF BREAD 134
END OF BREAD 135
END OF BREAD 136
END OF BREAD 137
END OF BREAD 138
END OF BREAD 139
END OF BREAD 140
END OF BREAD 141
END OF BREAD 142
END OF BREAD 143
END OF BREAD 144
END OF BREAD 145
END OF BREAD 146
END OF BREAD 147
END OF BREAD 148
END OF BREAD 149
END OF BREAD 150
END OF BREAD 151
END OF BREAD 152
END OF BREAD 153
END OF BREAD 154
END OF BREAD 155
END OF BREAD 156
END OF BREAD 157
END OF BREAD 158
END OF BREAD 159
END OF BREAD 160
END OF BREAD 161
END OF BREAD 162
END OF BREAD 163
END OF BREAD 164
END OF BREAD 165
END OF BREAD 166
END OF BREAD 168
END OF BREAD 169
END OF BREAD 170
END OF BREAD 171
END OF BREAD 172
END OF BREAD 173
END OF BREAD 174
END OF BREAD 175
END OF BREAD 176
END OF BREAD 177
END OF BREAD 178
END OF BREAD 179
END OF BREAD 180
END OF BREAD 181
END OF BREAD 182
END OF BREAD 183
END OF BREAD 184
end of bread 185
END OF BREAD 186
END OF BREAD 187
END OF BREAD 188
END OF BREAD 189
END OF BREAD 190
END OF BREAD 191
END OF BREAD 192
END OF BREAD 193
END OF BREAD 194
END OF BREAD 195
END OF BREAD 196
END OF BREAD 197
END OF BREAD 198
END OF BREAD 199
END OF BREAD 200
END OF BREAD 201
END OF BREAD 202
END OF BREAD 203
END OF BREAD 204
END OF BREAD 205
END OF BREAD 206
END OF BREAD 207
END OF BREAD 208
END OF BREAD 209
END OF BREAD 210
END OF BREAD 211
END OF BREAD 212
END OF BREAD 213
END OF BREAD 214
END OF BREAD 215
END OF BREAD 216
END OF BREAD 217
END OF BREAD 218
END OF BREAD 219
END OF BREAD 220
END OF BREAD 221
END OF BREAD 222
END OF BREAD 223
END OF BREAD 224
END OF BREAD 225
END OF BREAD 226
END OF BREAD 227
END OF BREAD 228
END OF BREAD 229
END OF BREAD 230
END OF BREAD 231
END OF BREAD 232
END OF BREAD 233
END OF BREAD 234
END OF BREAD 235
END OF BREAD 236
END OF BREAD 237
END OF BREAD 238
END OF BREAD 239
END OF BREAD 240
END OF BREAD 241
END OF BREAD 242
END OF BREAD 243
END OF BREAD 244
END OF BREAD 245
END OF BREAD 246
END OF BREAD 247
END OF BREAD 248
END OF BREAD 249
END OF BREAD 250
END OF BREAD 251
END OF BREAD 252
END OF BREAD 253
END OF BREAD 254
END OF BREAD 255
END OF BREAD 256
END OF BREAD 257
END OF BREAD 258
END OF BREAD 259
END OF BREAD 260
END OF BREAD 261
END OF BREAD 262
END OF BREAD 263
END OF BREAD 264
END OF BREAD 265
END OF BREAD 266
END OF BREAD 267
END OF BREAD 268
END OF BREAD 269
END OF BREAD 270
END OF BREAD 271
END OF BREAD 272
END OF BREAD 273
END OF BREAD 274
END OF BREAD 275
END OF BREAD 276
END OF BREAD 277
END OF BREAD 278
END OF BREAD 279
END OF BREAD 280
END OF BREAD 281
END OF BREAD 282
END OF BREAD 283
END OF BREAD 284
END OF BREAD 285
END OF BREAD 286
END OF BREAD 287
END OF BREAD 288
END OF BREAD 289
END OF BREAD 290
END OF BREAD 291
END OF BREAD 292
END OF BREAD 293
END OF BREAD 294
END OF BREAD 295
END OF BREAD 296