Drama makes for shitty dough.
I've always thought QRB has done a pretty good job of ignoring drama and just staying focused on doing work. It can be a strong silence that speaks volumes.
Does this look like a key to anybody?
3c521ab456ce856dc229e8261968ae3c2acadab490338ae839311880caffa89c
Filename of picture from qpost 3653
http://8kun.top/projectdcomms/res/20.html#94
Google search links to the /biz post from 30-May
https://warosu.org/biz/thread/13917999?cf_chl_jschl_tk=27897109c72e776bb4534e6a96421a3b3a6a42a3-1575700974-0-AefpAx3TuEqOVbAdT-TZgbrdwHrXpi_9rrxO-VlUTLGFmZimKO3vIIOcG9XRi1vDphh7P3BXWgfT-flmTuJpAPawRs2nHesMuentIOgG3wc2At_xeW4K9SOXxPKRTPK8GX2IlhaXW1DSjUDl49mKMOZEY6jIqVo37CKI_MNuX2ZHwflkCPl_ABR6ejWhEBX7_XtNSdJ8Q_kP709DqnolTImdxncGbM9-1L2064OfIwGSKGmj5pnO-XTJ6HTCAL3VgQDPQ9ae3uwNyZhsiBxifc2pVYjMvlNPFk8ngFLBFmdM
This little dig gets more interesting....
Yesterday, an order to sell 8 bitcoin (BTC), worth $60,000, tanked the price of Bitcoin on a single trading pair on crypto exchange Binance. It was either a fat-fingered mistake or there were more nefarious plans underway.
The trade was made on the trading pair between bitcoin and a stablecoin—a cryptocurrency that keeps its price pegged to a fiat currency, like the US dollar—called StableUSD (USDS).
With a 24-hour trade volume of just over $130,000, the large sell order represented more than half of this trading pair's daily trade volume, allowing it to sell through the order book and crash Bitcoin to a low of $681.81—on this trading pair—before recovering. Despite the flash crash, bitcoin is currently trading at a price of $7,393, up 1.6% for the day.
StableUSD was launched a year ago by Stably. However, its maket cap has been cut in half since its first few months, showing that fewer people are making use of the stablecoin. It is now ranked 542 on CoinMarketCap. In contrast, stablecoins like Tether have seen their market caps rise drastically, over this time.
This isn't the first time a sudden move like this has happened on this trading pair before. In April, when the price of bitcoin was $5,000, it jumped up to $11,000 on this trading pair, also on Binance.
There are three main reasons why somebody would sell a huge amount of bitcoin at a below-market rate. The first of these is that somebody simply made a mistake and placed a limit sell order for far below market rate. If this is the case, then at least one buyer got incredibly lucky and managed to purchase a massive amount of bitcoin for under $700.
The next two options involve manipulating the market in order to profit.
One explanation is that traders might be doing this to manipulate the market, for example, by simultaneously crashing the market and shorting it—betting against its future price. Margin or leverage trading could be used to increase the effect of doing so. However, this is unlikely in this case because there are no futures trading offerings for this trading pair, making it hard to profit from the endeavor.
Alternatively, coins are sometimes sold below market value in order to transfer money from one account to another. If a hacker takes control of someone else's account—for example via phishing techniques—they might be unable to withdraw directly from the compromised account and will often use this kind of tactic. However, this also seems fairly unlikely in this case, since the amount was so high.
Either way, BTC:USDS is the lowest volume stablecoin trading pair on Binance, so—unless this changes—it will stay particularly vulnerable to manipulation. And if the stablecoin's usage continues to drop, it may disappear anyway.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/bitcoin-flash-crash-700-binance-125808825.html
You're rollin' Anon and it's Awesome!
I just wanted to summarize what I found last night
06-Dec Punisher filename pointed to 4 ch /biz archive about trafficking and Binance on 05-Dec Yahoo posted article about Binance transaction causing flash crash
It made me wonder if Q post was breadcrumb to a battle with crypto and traffic financing
Thanks, I wanted to dig on this to see if any relation to past dig on the evolution of conventional D5 Titans
I like how you summarized it all.
The punisher filename did get a lot of eyes and digging on QR(tracing back to WikiLeaks, new links appearing, Q posting pic previously with diff filename). I didn't see much more on Binance though.
I don't have time to cross post until late tonight or tomorrow. But if you or anyone else wants to, please do.
Was Comey's tweet pointing to the Woods Procedures?
That is weird.... To find Comey in IG report, you have to search for corn
>>> 7472736
From QR notables
TL;DR on 17 findings from IG FISA report, condensed from JS article
1 Omitted that Page was an “other agency” asset planted in campaign
2 Lied about quality of info from Steele
3 Lied about the reliability of another source
4 Lied about Steele reporting to press (Yahoo news article not original)
5 Hid testimony from PapaD that denied Russian collusion
6 Hid Page’s testimony that he had never talked to Manafort (and couldn’t be colluding thru him)
7 Hid more facts that didn’t support Page working with Russia
8 Hid facts from reliable sources that Trump had nothing to do with Wikileaks (Podesta emails)
9 Altered emails to hide Page’s “other agency” affiliation
10 Hid info the made Steele appear unreliable
11 Hid info from Ohr showing that Simpson (Fusion GPS, rabid anti-Trump) paid Steele
12 Hid info on Steele-Simpson-DNC relationships
13 Didn’t correct lie about Steele providing Yahoo news the info, even when proven so later
14 Hid finding that Steele info was “minimally corroborated”
15 Hid PapaD testimony that Trump was not involved in DNC (Podesta emails) hack
16 Omitted Misfud’s denial of providing PapaD info
17 Omitted info about extent of Page’s role/influence on Republican platform change on Russian annexation of Ukraine
Mostly lies of omission about quality and origins of sources and hiding of exculpatory findings
Every board definitely has it's own flavor.
Before 8ch went down, I would cross post items from QRB, Qresearch, and 4ch to /v/greatawakening. Now, not so much. In fact, sometimes I'll grab nuggets from there and post here.
Many of the Anons there hated the chan formatting and needed screenshots and rewrites to even read content. It was easy to spot some QRB anons there though. Voat/greatawakening does well, but sometimes the spectrum of coverage can be a little narrow.
Qresearch is a firehose. It flows way fast and good stuff flies by. In the past I would jump in the flow and absorb the news of the day and then hit QRB to focus on key happenings. Ever since 8kun has come back, that method hasn't worked as well. Instead, I hit /pol, /v, and endchan more often than in the past. It takes time for a phone fag like me. Plus Qresearch is fucking messy these days.
It seems like many of the old QRB anons aren't back and it still makes me wonder where they went.