Further to looking glass - really great digs by the way. I posted this to qresearch yesterday (not competing for anything, just dropping what I did as it may be related).

Large Scale Data Collection:

XKEYSCORE>NSA

PROMIS>NSA

Other datasources that track behaviour, purchases, opinions. Social Media, Credit/store cards,. etc.

Looking Glass THINK MIRROR

NSA Fort Mead THINK MIRROR

If you had Yottabytes upon Yottabytes of data, what could you do with it?

If you had virtually unlimited computational processing power, what could you do with it?

If you had enough data on individuals and entities, could you analyze it and come to 'predicted outcomes' ?

Think WARGAMES - run scenario after scenario, after scenario.

Occam's razor.

p.s. (not in original post)

There's also an operation looking glass which was ariel observation/airborne control centers.

https://www.loc.gov/resource/hhh.ne0072.photos/?sp=2

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Looking_Glass

Hi baker - thank you for your service, it is really appreciated.

Personally, I'm pretty much okay with whatever (I know, that doesn't help much) as long as we keep QRB.

If we do bake at 425, will we need to fill up the bread to prevent dubious drops after we've left that bread behind?

>>40534

Thanks for capping that anon, and the other info - looks interesting and will follow up on those links.

>>40536

Thnaks anon - I find it very fruitful to read old articles (often again) with new eyes, knowing what we now know. Read quite a bit of stuff re: NSA data collection back when people barely knew what a terrabyte was, let alone petabytes and yottobytes.Probably time to revisit them too.

Part of the reason I went for the NSA + Data (the simplest answer) was because I remembered something I'd read/watched (can't remember the source, and haven't re-found it yet) that basically went along the lines of with the datasets they currently have on us as individuals, they can accurately predict our movements and daily routines. Humans are apparently quite predictable in their routines even with a small dataset - i.e. we are creatures of habit.

I guess I need to find that source again.

I'm not discounting 'wilder possibilities' but I'm going to need more sauce than Camelot/Wilcock and co and the SG-1 TV shows to swing strongly in that direction.... so much misdirection goes on. Fascinating stuff though.

Apologies for the long post anons, I'm a quite upbeat as some gentle redpills (more seeds than pills) planted a while back are starting to come to fruitition. A couple of friends now ask me for input with goings on in the news (not that I profess to know it all, just they recognise I take a different, critical view on things). I made a complimentary remark about POTUS which they queried -"But he's going to start a war!" So I gently explained Benghazi attacks 2012 vs 2020 and how they were handled - now that really made them think. Just for keks, I put the SpaceX launch on their 65" TV and said, watch and tell me what you see - no other direction than that. Now that (regardless of what it actually is) was a WTF moment for them, especially coupled with the story published on the mission carrying genetically modified mice onboard - "Well that's a bit of a wierd coincidence..."

Just before the Christmas break, a couple of us were discussing Greta, when the office cleaner who was nearby and could hear us chipped in and said "You know she's funded by George Soros, don't you?" my colleague pulled an incredulous face - I kek'd and gave them a ;-)

...people are waking up.

I'll shut up now. Pic related - for ME.