>>40574

Well, Digital Sherlocks brings their direct website up both as an added explanation and the first result. I don't have type formatting memorized, so here is a copy pasta. Comments intermixed.

>Our Mission

>To identify, expose, and explain disinformation where and when it occurs using open source research; to promote objective truth as a foundation of government for and by people; to protect democratic institutions and norms from those who would seek to undermine them in the digital engagement space.

Double speak that sounds more akin to an authority status as final arbitrator.

>To create a new model of expertise adapted for impact and real-world results.

>To forge digital resilience at a time when humans are more interconnected than at any point in history, by building the world’s leading hub of digital forensic analysts tracking events in governance, technology, security, and where each intersect as they occur, as well as a network of #DigitalSherlocks.

This sounds like AI functionality.

>Understanding Disinformation

>The Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic Research Lab (DFRLab) has operationalized the study of disinformation by exposing falsehoods and fake news, documenting human rights abuses, and building digital resilience worldwide.

More Authority, but I feel this includes something along the lines of media saturation and 4am talking points.

>Building Digital Resilience

>We continually track global disinformation campaigns, fake news stories, covert military developments, and subversive attempts against democracy while teaching the public skills to identify and expose attempts to pollute the information space.

Analyze Q drops to beat the events?

>Transforming the Digital Engagement Space

>Using open source, social media, and digital forensic research DFRLab's Digital Sherlocks have conducted ground breaking investigations into war crimes committed during the siege of Aleppo and ceasefire violations in Ukraine.

Push it first and push it hard makes it real?

>>40576

>Digital resilience

Just by definition, I see it as the strength of presence of a view. Either with numerous parrots screeching the same, false quorum, the strategic application of censorship, or unrepentant repetition of the same talking point as often as possible from vague tangents.

The digital sherlocks, as I have been reading more recent twitter activities and following some threads, seems more focused upon Russian GRU agents and leftist causes concerning Syria/ME. They use the Sherlocks like an attack dog, sometimes returning with a juicy steak, other times just howling. They do have a degree of accuracy that makes them dangerous, but the focus remains on state actors, Iran being talked about endlessly right now.

As an additional, researching the names of ACMF for other activities, one Merry Lin, originally and Obarna NSC member, brought me to a pre Q article with a nice tid bit. She was one of the more adherent to Ben Rhodes, an Obarna National Security Advisor. I was also able to gather three more NSC names. Artivle in question if you are so inclined to read it.

https://spectator.org/mcmaster-the-ultimate-holdover/

>>40578

Oh, forgot one more note. Another NSC member is in charge at AC:DFRLab

>Graham Brookie

>| Director and Managing Editor |

>Graham Brookie is the director and managing editor of the DFRLab. He previously served in various positions at the White House and National Security Council. His most recent role was as an adviser for strategic communications with a focus on digital strategy, audience engagement, and coordinating a cohesive record of former US President Obarna’s national security and foreign policy