>Later, she started a new weight loss diet heavy on kale and wasn't feeling too well. Good thing we looked it up--another disaster waiting to happen.
Without reading everything...can you expound on the Kale comment?
>BO from /qr/ is leaving,
No not accurate
It was a discussion because of a leaked conversation between Watkins and a Disgruntled employee.
In the conversation Jim says /qr/ will leave after the election. Which is not full context.
Watching his Easter video provides better info if you can .
/qr/ BO is looking for a backup in case Jim shuts down, which may be the case (8kun)
>>>/qresearch/8788320
He goes into more detail in the video..first 1:15:00 is worth listening to, after that mostly chit chat.
Watkins Video
0:16:25 Germany Nat Socialist - awful pictures /qresearch "Lets clean that up.."
odd
0:23:55-0:25:30 Serious Question - Do you ever plan to expose Q? "No I do not ever plan to do that" "Yes silly 6 you are confused" ~28:00 moar
0:29:30-0:32:00+ November discussion (Business related, nothing spoopy)
Good time to look for a backup plan
0:43:00+ Q question - talks about media matters [enemies]
1:06+ Discusses /v/ and his talking like a Sgt (Used to be one)
>the fact that he's willing to dox someone's private conversation
@FJ didn't it was posted by Mark Mann on the /v/ board and brought over by an anon reposted by @FJ for context). Just to keep things accurate
Been tracking this since it happened on Easter, and was there when the lolliporn started (reporting it to global) <--- Jim covers cp topic also
>the fact that he's willing to dox someone's private conversation
@FJ didn't it was posted by Mark Mann on the /v/ board and brought over by an anon reposted by @FJ for context). Just to keep things accurate
Been tracking this since it happened on Easter, and was there when the lolliporn started (reporting it to global) <--- Jim covers cp topic also.
>the fact that he's willing to dox someone's private conversation
@FJ didn't it was posted by Mark Mann on the /v/ board and brought over by an anon reposted by @FJ for context). Just to keep things accurate
Been tracking this since it happened on Easter, and was there when the lolliporn started (reporting it to global) <--- Jim covers cp topic also..
Damn error 0 <Captcha <> error 0 <> triple post
>And even goes on to say he is exposing Jim's private convo to the Q community in an effort at transparency.
It was posted prior to @fj post today, on Easter.
>turn QR anons against jim and then provide the haven at the same time.
You are operating under limited data if that is what you see.
Watch Jim's video he speaks to the fact if the site isn't making money by election it is going away.
Seems like some of "anons" are jumping to conclusions based on emotions, and preconceived notions, while not looking at all of the relevant data.
FIRST TIME POSTED
>>>/qresearch/8768483
https://8kun.top/v/res/16909565.html