>>42308
>For example, the deletion of a thread that is essentially the same as the "Pass the Test" thread on /qresearch/ that allows for tests/tryouts.
Not trying to be a dick but seriously.. you need a thread on /qrb/ for this? There are 466 boards on 8kun, about 10 boards I would consider active that have 2 PPH or more, and that's being generous. Most people would not consider 2 PPH an active board. So there are about 450 dead boards where you can do all the testing you like, and that's what a lot of people do already. If you're going to go with the argument that the thread is for inexperienced anons, I can guarantee you that those users will not be on this board.
This board is dead. It's my meta board that I created in case I lost my password and security code to the main board. I have every right to do some cleanup when there haven't been any posts in a thread in weeks/months and appear mostly useless.
You can't even test tripcodes on this board because of the whitelist implemented here, so /comms/ is by default a better place already if you want to use that board.
Again, this is my board and if something is ancient and dead then I see no reason to keep it around. This isn't a personal attack on you dude, I'm a fucking janny lol.
>Imo, there's too much heat and not enough light here. Bakers aren't perfect and neither is the board. Is there baker fuckery? I don't think so but don't know for sure.
Yeah I agree. Nobody is perfect, none of the set up systems set up are perfect. We're all trying to find a solution and it's not an easy task, I get it.
>One reason i've tried to hard to maintain /qrb general/ since Nov 2 is bc it was a great digging board that had VERY little dissension.
You've done a great job at it considering you've pretty much kept this board alive single-handedly by baking here. Please understand that this is very much appreciated.
>Thus, a lot of excellent work got done here.
Some work got done here, that's about it. It's subjective.
>My general pov re /qr/ kitchen: there has been a core group of bakers who have kept it more or less running for a long time now.
I'm not a baker so I'm from the outside looking in, it looks like there are multiple groups to me, just sayin'. Maybe it's not even the /comms/ crew at all, I dunno but there are subversive groups who are being exclusive and giving me the impression that the /comms/ crew is complicit. If it is the /comms/ crew. I'm gonna take a fucking big fat steaming dump on that board. We'll see as things progress.
>Current baker here.
If so then you own an endchan board and can resume operations there no? I offered you this board a while ago because I don't care to manage it anymore due to being extremely busy. The offer is still open.
>>42301
>I too have a couple of suspects in this
>same baker that has refused to handoff
>was same baker that refused to update the GMT section with the /comms/ archive link
>not once but twice...
Yeah I think I saw that too.
And yeah I did make that post on /comms/.
Maybe it's not your group, but who the fuck is in charge of banning anons???
New trip because I forgot my old password.