dChan
Anonymous ID: b19b5b May 30, 2020, 4:44 a.m. No.42301   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2313

>>42300

>but it is the refusing of handoffs and the baker checking that I don't like.

 

I too have a couple of suspects in this

same baker that has refused to handoff

was same baker that refused to update the GMT section with the /comms/ archive link

not once but twice...

Anonymous ID: b19b5b May 30, 2020, 5:13 a.m. No.42302   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2305

>>42300

>I'm not bothered if clowns bake, but it is the refusing of handoffs and the baker checking that I don't like. A dangerous path.

 

not bothered if clowns butt fuck the bread

 

I think that says it all

 

please explain how a clown baking and inserting misinformation in the notables etc... is different than a misguided baker refusing to hand off?

Anonymous ID: b19b5b May 31, 2020, 4:38 a.m. No.42319   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2325

>>42313

>I'm not a baker so I'm from the outside looking in, it looks like there are multiple groups to me, just sayin'. Maybe it's not even the /comms/ crew at all, I dunno but there are subversive groups who are being exclusive and giving me the impression that the /comms/ crew is complicit. If it is the /comms/ crew. I'm gonna take a fucking big fat steaming dump on that board. We'll see as things progress.

 

 

I've offered once before and I'll do it again

I'll give you BV access to /comms/

 

>Maybe it's not your group,

 

I have strong suspicions but only suspicions been trying to accumulate proof

I'd appreciate your help rooting out the subversives

 

>but who the fuck is in charge of banning anons???

 

??? one incident of a baker refusing to hand off... or has this happened multiple times for the last few months?

 

how can an anon baker ban someone?

or does this whole situation seem like old tricks from well known non-anons?

anybody heard from the BO of /qresearch/ on this topic?