have you seen this?
https://qmap.pub/read/4430
(pic related)
i've been puzzled by ng antics over the last couple of days.
some help understanding this, please: are bad actors within ng also being outed en masse? do recent actions provide enough grounds for removal as per ucmj code as pointed to in herridge's tweet? or am i completely off track (off track, unfortunately, is where i spend most of my time)
>>42402 >>42403 >>42405 >>42403
thanks for feedback, much appreciated.
the thought they were 'actors' rather than 'bad actors' crossed my mind too. i am always remembering what q said about 'great actors' and 'enjoy the show' , and try to wait a few days to see what shakes out rather than give in to knee-jerk reactions.
that brings me to this question - how difficult is it to remove graffiti? i ask because from what i've seen, rioters are using spray paint. aren't spray paints oil-based? yet in that recent video of the female driver berating three women who were removing graffiti from a (masonry) building, it seems the graffiti is just washing away. i can see that might be the case if the liquid is all or mostly solvent, but according to the linked site (to follow), solvent removal materials should be used in the form of a poultice on masonry.
this makes me wonder, is all of that graffiti 'real'? if not, is it part of the script? is it for optics?
this site (https://www.nps.gov/tps/how-to-preserve/briefs/38-remove-graffiti.htm#methods)
as of a few minutes ago, none of the videos on twitter maga accounts can be played. unsure if this is widespread issue or local.
revenge for parscale's remarks today?
TY, anon