Salon hit piece but great news

Not only does Lauren Boebert win her primary but gets a THUMBS UP from POTUS!!

The following Salon article is typical of her recent treatment by the MSM.

Trump congratulates [fringe] QAnon supporter who defeated his chosen candidate

ROGER SOLLENBERGER

JULY 2, 2020

Lauren Boebert's restaurant, where staff open-carry, was served with a cease-and-desist for opening amid COVID-19

President Donald Trump on Tuesday tweeted his admiration for a right-wing fringe candidate who defeated the five-term incumbent who he had endorsed in a Colorado primary election.

"Congratulations on a really great win!" Trump wrote in the tweet, applauding Lauren Boebert, the 33-year-old Republican candidate who supports the QAnon conspiracy theory and handed a decisive loss to long-serving Rep. Scott Tipton, R-Colo.

https://www.salon.com/2020/07/01/trump-congratulates-fringe-qanon-supporter-who-defeated-his-chosen-candidate/

= = = = =

i'm currently compiling all the Q hit pieces thru Jun 30 2020 and Lauren Boebert is getting a LOT of negative attention from the press. In the past, they have been successful both in getting people fired, getting them to step down from organizations, and getting them defeated politically. Lauren is defying the odds by decisively beating an entrenched opponent in a primary even after getting repeatedly attacked for being associated with Q.

Look her up in qresear.ch, she was interviewed by Breitbart on the fly during a pro-gun rally. For a vid clip, see

>>>/qrb/40686, >>>/qrb/40687 Lauren Boebert clip from gun rights rally

>>42545

>>42547

TYB

Really great to know you are here, previous baker is swamped with other projects. Also, i do a lot of diggs - nice to have baker and digger roles separated. Last, the strength of /qrb/ has always been in its slower pace, such that each submission gets more attention (especially those involving anon input and reflection). Hard to compete on qresearch with breaking news items. So glad we still have at small but doughty band who this board.

>>42552

P.S. the term "carriage return" is a semi-dox re age, ha-ha. (Anyone under 30 probably thinks that a 'carriage return' has something to do with an 18th century Lord of the Manor visiting his country estate. KEK.)

>>42556

>carriage return

They can prolly look it up in the urban dictionary, kek.

Happy Fourth, QRB

Just wanting to say hi to qrb fam. Always good to know yer here.

TYB, just noticed yer paste in qbin, how d'ya like the captcha-free experience?

Blessings upon this board and all who post here.

o7

>>42560

Thx BO. Was thinking of you the other night when /qr/ was overrun with really gross, illegal loli threads and posts. I don't know whether it's BO who responds to Global Reports in middle of the night. Probably not.

Couldn't even start a new thread, had to wait 20 mins - shills flooded the place with loli. And the last qr thread was baked by Leafy, so had to start over once board was cleared.

from >>>/qresearch/9872643, >>>/qresearch/9873510 There are now 2000+ Articles on Q & 8chan/qun

There are now 2000+ Articles on Q & 8chan/qun

Oct 2017 - July 3 2020

This is a very conservative estimate of total number of MSM q- and 8chan/kun articles, because it doesn't include articles in other languages (many), those that just mention Q in passing, or twitter posts. Almost all the articles I found were on Q, not 8kun.

APRIL & MAY 2020

After something of a lull in April (due to the MSM's total obsession with "muh covid oh my gawd!!!"), MSM resumed its attacks against Q in May, focusing especially on how "far-right" groups give out "misinformation" on covid-related stuff like vaxxes and treatments like HCQ. Also on George Floyd at the end of May.

There was a noticeable increased in the diversity of the attacks in May - more than ever, it's becoming a matter of slinging mud at the wall and hoping that something sticks. But as in the past, there's not much response. Because more and more, it's the MSM who looks paranoid, extreme (because they push the narrative so hard that we and other conservatives as all gun-toting, potentially violent, far-right white supremicists). People just don't buy what they're selling anymore.

JUNE & JULY 2020

Election season!

Big focus on primaries and trying to villify any candidate who shows the least interest in Q. When some win their primaries, MSM is aghast (because in the past, any professional they managed to associate with Q either had to resign or was fired from their position). Suddenly, they are faced with the prospect of popular Q supporting candidates like Lauren Boebert being elected to office. (Panic, panic!!)

more to come.....

>>42566

In a certain way, there's no such thing as bad publicity.

At least, that seems to apply to us.

MSM has been railing at Q and Q group for years now, and we're getting more popular and they're getting less so.

(Doing something wrong, MSM??)

Kek.

>>42563

>We all know who is in charge....

ha-ha....

Contacting CM usually works for serious problems like LoliGate, he never seems to sleep and seems to know how to contact BO for BO-level problems (like the thread flooding of /qr/). All things considered, things are going swimmingly there despite all the shillery and the perennial baker shortage. It's all "on a wing and a prayer" but works nonetheless. Today i was prepping the updated timeline chart on media attacks on Q and it reminded me of just how resilient this place really is. Sometimes i think it's the biblefags that make the biggest contribution coz wo/those prayers, we'd probably be toast by now!

Here, I'll post what i've got on the timeline update. I like to put stuff here first sometimes. Will post full report in a day or two.

>>42568

good i posted this, need to up the resolution.

From QR, missed in notes:

>>>/qresearch/9907316, >>>/qresearch/9907327 HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE: QUACK CURE OR MISLEADINGLY MALIGNED? by Truth Seeker, 7/6/2020

HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE: QUACK CURE OR MISLEADINGLY MALIGNED?

by Truth Seeker, 7/6/2020

Perhaps taking a cue from Russia's Catherine the Great, who, in order to prove the safety and efficacy of inoculation, had herself and her court inoculated against smallpox in 1768, President Donald John Trump announced in May that he was taking the anti-malarial drug hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) as a prophylactic measure against Covid-19. Almost immediately, the media pounced upon this revelation with frantic and bizarre warnings against HCQ, citing every white coat who would lend their support in an attempt to demonize the treatment as "dangerous" and "useless."

According to some outlets and commentators, the President had to be lying, since taking such a dangerous drug would surely have killed the man, who is in his 70's. Others took President Trump at his word, instead characterizing his ingestion of the drug as reckless and stupid. By mid-June, the Food and Drug Administration had revoked its approval of HCQ for emergency use in Covid-19 patients, and the European Union had effectively banned the drug's use for the same purpose. Each cited controversial studies suggesting that the use of HCQ could lead to potentially-fatal heart complications, and calling into question the efficacy of the drug against SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes Covid-19 symptoms.

The media, who were once content to feign concern that the use of HCQ as a frontline treatment against Covid-19 would lead to shortages for lupus patients, now went on the assault against it. Peppering their speech with words like "expert" and "authority," anchors and commentators relentlessly set about painting a picture: Hydroxychloroquine is a dangerous poison that arrests the heart, and President Trump is touting it as a quack cure for Covid-19 against the advice of the scientific community.

Is this a fair and accurate representation of the situation? In a world ruled by "expert culture," one in which people blindly default to the answers provided by approved sources, the author of this article felt dirty and mischievous even asking. Nonetheless, out of an earnest belief that people are qualified to think for themselves, I pressed forward with an investigation into that very question. The following is what I uncovered.

1. The April Study That Found No Benefit to HCQ Was (1) Chinese and (2) Not Peer-Reviewed

To begin with, the Chinese Communist Party, at the very center of the coronavirus outbreak, has continually been dishonest or less-than-forthcoming about its involvement with and response to it. Nonetheless, professionals in suits and ties were quick to scold the public for distrusting Glorious China when, in April, it published an unverified and un-reviewed study indicating that HCQ provided no benefit in the treatment of Covid-19. To quote medRxiv:

"This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice."

But "guide clinical practice" it did, as the media and three-letter organizations began pointing to it as a reason against prescribing or administering HCQ. [Source: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.10.20060558]

2.The Lancet Study that Influenced the WHO and World Governments to Ban HCQ Was Based on Unreliable Data and Has Since Been Retracted

This May, a Lancet Study that led directly to the WHO and a number of nations globally either banning the use of HCQ for prophylaxis against Covid-19 or halting clinical trials was retracted, with the authors apologizing for having caused "confusion" through their unverifiable source in Surgisphere. To quote:

"Because all the authors were not granted access to the raw data and the raw data could not be made available to a third-party auditor, we are unable to validate the primary data sources underlying our article, “Cardiovascular Disease, Drug Therapy, and Mortality in Covid-19.” We therefore request that the article be retracted. We apologize to the editors and to readers of the Journal for the difficulties that this has caused."

[Source: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-lancet-retracts-hydroxychloroquine-studies-covid-19/]

part 1 of 2

>>42571

part 2 of 2

HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE: QUACK CURE OR MISLEADINGLY MALIGNED?

by Truth Seeker, 7/6/2020

1. A Number of Variables in the Oft-Cited Brazilian Study Have Been Outright Ignored by the Mainstream Media

Here are a few interesting facts that the author of this article uncovered:

In the Brazilian study used this May to assassinate chloroquine and its derivatives, "…all patients received ceftriaxone and azithromycin." [Sources: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.07.20056424v2, https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2765499]

According to a 14-year study conducted by the New England Journal of Medicine, patients taking azithromycin (Z-pak) have a 2.5-fold increased chance of death from heart problems compared to those taking amoxicillin. Compared to those taking no antibiotic, that chance is around threefold. It may therefore be factually stated that azithromycin is known to increase the risk of heart complications. [Source: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1003833. Ray, W.A. The New England Journal of Medicine, May 17, 2012. Wayne A. Ray, PhD, professor of preventive medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tenn. Jay Varkey, MD, assistant professor of medicine, division of infectious diseases, Emory University; director of antibiotic management, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta.]

According to the Mayo Clinic, one common side effect of Cetriafxone is chest pain. Additionally, less-common side effects include "fast, irregular, pounding, or racing heartbeat or pulse," or, in other words, arrhythmia. It may therefore be factually stated that Cetriafxone is known to interfere with heart rhythms. [Source: https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supplements/ceftriaxone-injection-route/side-effects/drg-20073123]

In other words, patients in the Brazilian study were given two antibiotics known to interfere with heart function in addition to chloroquine. To say the very least, this revelation muddies the waters as to exactly what was causing heart problems in the study. Anyone familiar with the scientific method knows that such variables need to be controlled-for in order to isolate the effects of the independent variable researchers are looking at.

Most disturbing, however, was the sheer difficulty that this article's author had in finding mention of these variables (the above-mentioned antibiotics) in American publications reporting on the Brazilian study. While it is remiss to attribute to malice what can instead be attributed to sheer stupidity, the fact remains that this oversight in English-language media bears every hallmark of a deliberate omission.

1. HCQ Actually Does Help Fight Covid-19; Can Cut Mortality In Half

In the early hours of July 3, CNN quietly published an article outright contradicting their previous rhetoric surrounding HCQ, shamefully admitting that:

"Dr. Marcus Zervos, division head of infectious disease for Henry Ford Health System, said 26% of those not given hydroxychloroquine died, compared to 13% of those who got the drug. The team looked back at everyone treated in the hospital system since the first patient in March." [Source: https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/02/health/hydroxychloroquine-coronavirus-detroit-study/index.html]

CONCLUSIONS

To create a full and comprehensive review of the available data surrounding HCQ and Covid-19 would be impossible in the space allotted to this citizen's op-ed. This is partially due to the fact that the data itself is so unclear. The waters have been muddied, by all appearances, by design.

My question is this: Why is it that the rhetoric surrounding this drug, which has been accepted as safe for decades and decades, bears the appearance of being designed to disparage it? Why does the media seem so hell-bent on reaching the conclusion that HCQ is useless or even dangerous, regardless of contradicting data? Why is it that any positives attributed to HCQ are viewed with such unrelenting skepticism, while the negatives are emphasized, amplified, and taken at face value? Why would anybody ban physicians from making their own calls, using their own judgement and experience, on whether to prescribe any drug?

As the continued lockdowns cause poverty, depression, starvation, and suicides to spike, it is clear that the authorities are happy to deem these as acceptable losses in order to fight Covid-19. Why is a small risk of arrhythmia considered unacceptable and reckless by these same people?

Something is very fishy. But what would I know? I am not a doctor and not qualified to think for myself or ask questions.

part 2 of 2

###

been meaning to post this here, just busy - apologies. just reposted on qresearch coz it's off the catalog already.

=MSM Articles on Q and 8chan: ~2000 articles as of July 2 2020==

PAGE 1 OF 3

FINAL REPORT

__ROOTS of the "MSM on Q" Project___

In the fall of 2018, this anon started digging on what had been written about Q by the MSM. Found some posts in qresear.ch, but nothing systematic. In Jan 2019, posted the first of 12 reports detailing articles on Q: what was said, who was saying it, and which publications were most active. That first report detailed over 300 articles where Q was the main focus (not just mentioned in passing). Now there are 2000 in the database and many more not documented here, because I limited the search to English articles published either in the US, Canada or England. In the beginning, I seldom ran across foreign language articles. This dramatically changed after the ChristChurch mass shooting in March 2019. Now there are articles on Q from all over the globe in many different languages. As with American MSM pubs, these were - and are - full of derogatory claims, mostly unsubstantiated. During the first half of 2018, the aim was to write Q off as a larp. But on Aug 1 2018, the forces behind the MSM launched a nationwide war against Q, trying to create the impression of Q and those of follow Q as right-wing white supremicists capable of violent acts. After Christchurch, they tried to link Q with 8chan, despite the fact that shooters who posted manifestos on 8chan never posted on /qresearch.

When Q generated a long MSM list Q #2018 (Feb 2019), I used that as a guide, but also added Right Wing Watch and Media Matters. There are some MSM videos included, since that's the format favored by the Big Three networks: ABC, NBC and CBS. But only a few tweets, because the object was to track (supposedly) substantive material. Did include as an add-on one extremely important twitter thread by Praying Medic, where he tore apart the highly specious but widely cited claim by Yahoo Fake News in late July 2019 that one FBI branch had designated Q group as domestic terrorists (search on "praying medic" to find it in the article PDF's).

This is the LAST REPORT re MSM articles on Q

This is a good stopping point for several reasons. First, the number of articles continues to grow, making the project increasingy unwieldy for a single anon w/no staff. Second, the technical limits of MS-Word are almost exceeded; the file is becoming highly unstable. Third - and most importantly - the three original goals have now been achieved. Anons now know a lot more about who is writing, what they're saying, and which pubs who are pushing the MSM narrative the hardest (Wapo is the obvious leader with 150 articles; see below). We also know their tactics and how they have changed over time. But the most important thing we know is this: although they have been engaged in major league mudslinging since the very start, very little of it has stuck. Q is more popular now than ever, while the MSM's reputation continues to slide into oblivion. This anon will continue to track key MSM trends. Just won't be generating this kind of raw data.

TRENDS April-June 2020

From Jan to March 2020, the MSM articles on Q were pretty ''scatter-shot. By mid-March, the MSM started pushing fear porn very hard as part of their effort to unseat the current President. In April and May, they pushed Covid-19 to an extreme and derided Q's pushback on that narrative by characterizing Q followers as nut jobs bent on endangering the public by providing "misinfo" on the virus and related topics (vaxxing, HCQ, masks, projected cases/deaths). Of course, the exact opposite is true: it's the MSM that's been ruthlessly hyping Covid-19 ''disinfo.

Since George Floyd's death in late May, the press has pushed the fake boogaloo narrative in an effort to show that the violent activity during "protests" was from the right, not the left. Favorite tactic: juxtaposing Q and boogaloo hoping readers will think they are associated. Once the election primaries picked up in May, they tried to blackball any Q-endorsing candidate. In the past, they were able to get people fired simply by doxxing them as Q followers. This time around, several MSM targets won their primaries despite tons of negative PR.

See attached pages for CAPS, PDF's and other details.

>>42602

MSM Articles on Q and 8chan thru July 3 2020

PAGE 2 of 3

CAPS & PDFs

* Article timeline (3 total: whole timeline plus halves for easier reading)

* Total number of MSM platforms in descending order

* BIG 9 Authors by MSM media platform

* PDFs:

2000 articles by DATE: https://www.keepandshare.com/doc23/110467/2000-msm-articles-about-q-july-3-2020-by-date-pdf-1-9-meg

2000 articles by AUTHOR: https://www.keepandshare.com/doc23/110465/2000-msm-articles-about-q-july-3-2020-by-author-pdf-1-8-meg

2000 articles by PUB: https://www.keepandshare.com/doc23/110466/2000-msm-articles-about-q-july-3-2020-by-pub-pdf-1-8-meg

JOURNOS with 7+ MSM articles on Q/8chan

35+ Mike Rothschild (43), Alex Kaplan (42), Will Sommer (40), Jared Holt (40), Kyle Mantyla (40), Ben Collins (35)

12+ Brandy Zadrozny (18), Kelly Weill (16), David Covucci (15), Ali Breland (13), Drew Harwell (12), Tom Porter (12)

7+ Emily Birnbaum (11), Abby Ohlheiser (11), E J Dickson (11), Ryan Broderick (10), April Glaser (9), Adi Robertson (10), David Gilbert (10), Casey Newton (10), Jessyln Cook (8),

Philip Bump (7), John Bowden (7), Travis View (7), Kevin Roose (7), Eric Hananoki (7), Jane Coaston (7)

MSM publications with articles on Q/8chan

80+ WAPO (150), DAILYDOT (94), RWW (89)

50+ MEDIA MATTERS (77), NBC (75), NYT (70), DAILYBEAST (60), THEHILL (52), NEWSWEEK (52), UK-GUARDIAN (50)

30+ SALON (46), BUZZFEED (38), , VICE (41), ABC (40), HUFFPO (41), THEVERGE (36), CNN (31)

20+ ROLLINGSTONE (26), BUSINSDR (26), POLITICO (26), BREITBART (25), VOX (24), CBS (20),

10+ UK-BBC (19), SLATE (18), FOX (17), WIRED (17), NY-MAG (15), UK-SUN (15), SEATTLE TIMES (15), NPR (15), SPLC (14), MOTHER JONES (13), MASHABLE (13),

CBS (13), WSJ (12), ATLANTIC (12), UK-INDEP (12), YAHOO (12), TIME (11), WSJ (11)

APRIL 2020 THEMES in rough time order

• Q mom charged w/kidnapping her kids

• Q corona conspiracies

• Q linked to scary Boogaloo Boys

• Q misinfo = health threat

• Q's blame Gates for corona pandemic

MAY 2020 themes

• FB removes q accounts/others that promote "conspiracies"

• John Ratcliffe follows Q

• Q's are ignorant anti-vaxxers

• Vincent Fusca for congress

• Q is a new [cult] religion

• Q candidates are running for office (Jo Rae Perkins, etc.)

• Q movement is growing

• Q apps kicked out of Google Play

• Hilary Duff accusations

• Q's think that Fauci = DS plant (true!)

• George Floyd violence if from rightwing agitators/infiltrators_

JUNE 2020 themes

• Nothing can stop what is coming (influential Atlantic article)

• Praying Medic's new Roku channel banned

• Watter's baseless speculations re Floyd's death

• Lauren Boebert defeats incumbent in primary [ha-ha-ha - this is huge]

• Teens on tiktok troll Q

• Maher: Q's are rioting

• Policemen linked to "extremist group"

• Marjorie Taylor Green running in Georgia

• More boogaloo

• House Repubs condemn Q candidates (probably forced by MSM)

• Eric Trump promotes Q conspiracy

• Q is becoming more mainstream [so sad!]

• Trump at Mt Rushmore

just added to CAPS: comparison of article timeline with twitter trends re "Qanon"

>>42603

=MSM Articles on Q and 8chan thru July 3 2020==

PAGE 3 OF 3

NINE PHASES OF MSM COVERAGE ON Q (see Article Timeline CAP for more)

Phase

1 Q unknown to MSM: But they wonder if it has to do with "the calm before the storm" (Oct-Dec 2017)

2 Q is a LARP: MSM mocks Q, tries to make the idea sound silly (Jan-July 2018)

3 Q denounced: Mass attack launched Aug 1 2018; they try to say Q movement is dangerous w/weak evidence (Aug-Sept 2019)

4 Q assoc/w 8chan & attacked: MSM tries to associate Q/w fake bomber/synagogue shooter; also, fake science deployed to debunk Q (Oct-Feb 2019)

5 MSM frontal assault on both 8chan/Q: Each used to discredit the other after Christchurch & other shootings & attacks by Fredrick Brennan (March-July 2019)

6 8CHAN deplatformed on Aug 5 2019: Cloudflare ddos protection withdrawn, Jim Watkins subpoena'ed by House Dems (Aug-Oct 2019)

7 8CHAN replatformed as 8KUN on Nov 2: Focus shifts back to Q; attacks continue but it's routine stuff (Nov-Feb 2020)

8 Covid-19: MSM deep into Covid fear porn; says Qs put out misinfo/disinfo. After Floyd's death, tries to link Q's w/"Boogaloo Boys"(Mar-May 2020)

9 2020 Election: Q candidates for office panned by MSM but some win anyways - Q gets better, MSM gets worse (June-July 2020)

FUTURE Directions

As long as the traditional MSM remains dominant, most of the articles on Q will be negative. But a few cracks are starting to appear. So we may begin to see a turning of the tide soon - depending upon the timing of many unknown factors. Look forward to the day when we can compare positive w/ negative tallies.

HIGH CALORIE SAUCE:

Pew Research Center Survey: 23% of Americans have heard of Qanon (over 80 million) >>>/qrb/42009 (March 2020)

~1700 MSM articles thru Mar 31 2020 >>>/qrb/42033, >>>/qrb/42034 MSM Articles on Q and 8kun

MSM articles thru Dec 2019 >>>/qrb/41733, >>>/qrb/41734

MSM articles thru Oct 2019

https://endchan.net/qanonresearch/res/29280.html#29483

https://endchan.net/qanonresearch/res/29280.html#29484

MSM articles thru Aug 2019:

https://voat.co/v/QRV/3408544

Old Links to search in QResear.ch:

>>>/qresearch/7711603 Will Sommer hit piece accusing armed Q followers of planning a kidnap

>>>/qresearch/7712899 Anon digg on Sommer's libelous article

>>>/qresearch/7707523, >>>/qresearch/7707940 2020 Jared Holt hit piece on Oregon congressional candidate

>>>/qresearch/6947314 MSM articles on Q thru June '19

>>>/qresearch/6675051, >>>/qresearch/6675058 MSM articles on Q thru May '19

>>>/qresearch/6055292 Newsweek responds to "BIG 6" reporters attacking Q

>>>/qresearch/6027475 MSM articles on Q: 697 thru Mar '19

>>>/qresearch/4932436 Discussion of reporting on recent Comet Pizza fire

>>>/qresearch/4692767 IPOT goes after anti-Q writers like Will Sommer

>>>/qresearch/4678761 Discussion of Will Sommer, Jimmy Comet & Amanda Kleinman

>>>/qresearch/4601471 First anti-Q fake news article for 2019….RWW's Jared Holt

>>>/qresearch/4592014 238 MSM articles on Q thru Jan '19

>>>/qresearch/4386891, >>>/qresearch/4388458 Moar on Travis View

>>42604

Notes on comparison of Twitter mentions of Q with Article Timeline

See CAP on page 2

>>>/qresearch/10044656 - Q: INFORMATION WARFARE

>>>/qresearch/10045166 MSM articles (hit pcs) on Q compared with “Twitter Interest in QAnon"

>>>/qresearch/10044593 pb

• In a bread earlier today, an anon posted a chart with interest in Q from certain periods.

• Here it's mapped onto the timelines of articles (read: hit pieces) about Q.

• When compiling the last 3 months' worth of articles on Q, noticed that the numbers are going up and a much sharper angle (especially projected into the future).

• One reason I decided not to continue to collect every single article (there are just getting to be too many).

• (Always been my hope to see these hit pieces turn into informational articles, but there are still very few - Thx to American Thinker and Zerohedge for your courage!)

just posted on /qr/:

Big Tech Is Out to Get Conservatives,' Jim Jordan Warns. He Gave 15 Examples

On Wednesday, Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) powerfully denounced Big Tech companies for censoring conservatives. At the beginning of a Big Tech hearing, he gave 13 examples — some of which are questionable, but many of which are legitimately worrisome.

“I’ll just cut to the chase, Big Tech is out to get conservatives,” Jordan declared. “That’s not a suspicion, that’s not a hunch, that’s a fact.”

He launched into a long list of examples. PJ Media has organized them chronologically.

May 19, 2016: “Former Facebook employees admit Facebook routinely suppresses conservative views.”

July 2018: “Two years ago, Twitter shadowbanned two members of this committee,” Jordan alleged. He claimed that Twitter shadowbanned Reps. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.), Mark Meadows (R-N.C.), Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), and himself. He mocked Twitter’s response claiming “it was just a glitch in our algorithm.”

November 1, 2018: “Facebook silences a pro-life organization’s advertisement.”

April 19, 2020: “Google and YouTube announce a policy censoring the content that conflicts with recommendations of the World Health Organization,” Jordan noted. He reminded the audience that the WHO is the same organization that “lied to us [about the coronavirus pandemic], the organization that shilled for China.”

China’s Coronavirus Lies Have Taken ‘Countless Lives,’ Bred ‘Profound Hardship.’ Trump’s Had Enough

May 27, 2020: “Amazon Smile won’t let you give to the Family Research Council and the Alliance Defense Fund but you can give to Planned Parenthood,” Jordan said, referring to Amazon Smile’s reliance on the far-left smear factory the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) to ban the Family Research Council and Alliance Defending Freedom (previously known as Alliance Defense Fund) from Amazon’s charity platform.

May 28, 2020: “Twitter censors President Trump’s tweet on the riots in Minneapolis.”

May 29, 2020: “Twitter censors the White House for quoting” Trump’s censored tweet.

June 4, 2020: “Amazon bans a book critical of the coronavirus lockdowns written by a conservative commentator.”

June 16, 2020: “Google threatens to demonetize and ban the Federalist.”

June 19, 2020: Facebook removes posts from President Trump’s reelection campaign.

June 23, 2020: “Twitter censors the president again for saying he’ll enforce the rule of law against any autonomous zone in Washington, D.C.”

June 29, 2020: “Amazon bans President Trump’s account on Twitch after he raises concerns about defunding the police.”

Twitter Accuses Trump of ‘Glorifying Violence’ in Tweet That Sounds a Lot Like Obama in 2015

July 20, 2020: “Google removes the homepages of Breitbart and the Daily Caller.”

July 21, 2020: Ayatollah Khamenei, the Supreme Leader of Iran, the largest state-sponsor of terrorism in the world, tweeted, “The Islamic Republic of Iran will never forget the martyrdom of Soleimani and will definitely strike a reciprocal blow in the United States.” Jordan noted that Twitter did not censor Khamenei, who threatened American citizens, “but the president says he won’t allow an autonomous zone, and he gets censored!”

July 28, 2020: “Just last night, we learned Google has censored Breitbart so much traffic has declined 99 percent.”

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/tyler-o-neil/2020/07/29/big-tech-is-out-to-get-conservatives-jim-jordan-warns-he-gave-15-examples-n727174

>>42606

the problem I've found for decades is that MS-Word just breaks down at some point with long files - starts acting really wonky. i've written books w/detail tables and graphics, can't use Word at all. Even Adobe InDesign will get wonky at some point, always wondered what creators of say 1000 page technical docs do. No doubt that software engineers that can ramp up the capabilities. But individuals do not.

NEW THREAD:

WA, OREGON, I-5 CORRIDOR -

Turn the Tide Thread

>>>/comms/21199

Oregon and Washington are under attack

by groups bent on destroying our freedom at the regional, state, county & city level

Let'sDIG DEEPand createMEMES

to combat this attack.

We know that BLM and ANTIFA are the enemy

But what are the specific groups involved?

• What are their /comms/?

• Who are the leaders?

• Who does the funding and how is the $ passed down/laundered?

• What's the role of public officials like the mayors of Seattle and Portland?

• How are those public officials linked to known DS entities?

• What's the link between local govt's and the UN? (Agenda 21/2030)

STEP BY STEP

1 - Post NW breaking news here first, then copy to thread

2 - Consolidate the info to see what it shows

3 - Develop a flowchart that maps it all out

4 - Get the word out to Defang the Beast

We can work together to TURN THE TIDE

Let the public know what's really going on

Save the coastal Pacific Northwest from the

tyrants

who have invaded our lives.

Anons, PLZ DIGG.

Help turn the Pacific NorthLeft Coast into the Pacific NorthWest Coast again

>>42611

>text file in structured directories such as publisher, author, date, title, etc

Not sure how that would work. Needs a powerful (and robust) database app, really.

The other problem is that this project really needs more than one person. It's grown so big. If someone else could collect the article info, i could do the analyses. But something's gotta give - already using tape, compression sleeves, braces, etc., pushing the limits here.

o7