These excellent well-sauced notes were pasted on qresearch last week:
https://pastebin.com/u3LUdk47
Topics:
CF ever-morphing charter
Epstein a CF founder
CF Donors (Panama Papers)
Michael Schumacher (F1) a CF donor?
Bill Clinton Lolita trips
SDNY role
Doug Band, counselor to BC
Comey Money/Clinton ties
Did this fan the flames of the CCP shitshow on qresearch?
07-Jul
FBI Director Christopher Wray: The people of the United States are the victims of what amounts to Chinese theft on a scale so massive that it represents one of the largest transfers of wealth in human history
https://mobile.twitter.com/statedept/status/1280630170294996992?s=21
Is Wayfair look here not there?
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/07/breaking-unsealed-govt-memo-dated-january-30-2017-reveals-obama-cabal-knew-flynn-wasnt-lying-wasnt-agent-russia/
10-Jul tweets referenced:
https://mobile.twitter.com/Techno_Fog
In the First 'Dossier Lawsuit' Against Steele, Judge Awards Damages to Those He Falsley Accused
A British judge on Wednesday ordered former British spy Christopher Steele to pay damages to two Russian bankers, who Steele had accused in the 'Trump dossier' of having illicit ties to Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Steele goes to trial in another dossier-related lawsuit later this month. Aleksej Gubarev, a Russian tech executive, claims that Steele falsely accused him of using his companies to help Russian hackers steal information from Democrats in 2016.
https://dailycaller.com/2020/07/08/christopher-steele-alfa-dossier-lawsuit-aven-fridman/
U.S. files superseding indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell
Phone fagging, posted accidentally. Has anyone looked at the superceding indictment. I haven't found it yet.
U.S. files superseding indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-people-ghislaine-maxwell-superseding-idUSKBN24B2D7
This article was updated. Original had more info...
JULY 10, 2020 / 11:12 AM / UPDATED 3 HOURS AGO
NEW YORK (Reuters) - U.S. prosecutors have filed a superseding indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell, the former girlfriend and longtime associate of the late financier Jeffrey Epstein.
The indictment was made public on Friday in Manhattan federal court, and like the original indictment accused Maxwell of six criminal counts. Maxwell has been charged with luring underage girls so Epstein could sexually abuse them.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-people-ghislaine-maxwell-superseding-idUSKBN24B2D7
-what it means--
Can the indictment be amended (changed) to charge different or new crimes?
Technically speaking, an indictment cannot be “amended” once it has been returned by the grand jury, because that would violate the defendant’s Fifth Amendment right to be indicted by a grand jury. However, it is also true that prosecutors do frequently alter the crimes charged, or even add new charges, during the course of a criminal proceeding.
Prosecutors accomplish this by filing what is called a “superseding” indictment. A superseding indictment is just like any other indictment, and it must be obtained the same way as the original indictment—through a grand jury. The superseding indictment can include different charges, new charges, or add new defendants. Once the grand jury returns a superseding indictment, the superseding indictment replaces (supersedes) the original indictment.
According to this thread, https://mobile.twitter.com/joshgerstein/status/1281616167048642560, the superceding indictment fixed incorrect docket numbers for the civil suit where she allegedly perjured herself.
>>>/qresearch/9938773
https://mobile.twitter.com/TomFitton/status/1282336014829223937
>>>/qresearch/9959396
Former SDNY chief Geoffrey Berman told Congress ‘I decline to answer’ in response to 27 questions
On Monday, the House Judiciary Committee released a 75-page transcript of former Southern District of New York U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman’s testimony.
“I decline to answer that question because it is outside of the parameters established for the interview,” was a line Berman repeated 27 times in the transcript (PDF).
Berman used the line to refuse discussion about ongoing cases. He refused to describe the “serious concerns” he had about Attorney General Bill Barr.
He used it to refuse to answer why he believes he was removed from his position. He used it to refuse to answer if he had expressed concerns over how cases would be handled were he removed from his job.
He also declined to answer whether he was worried about the “tradition of integrity and independence” at SDNY.
He also declined to answer whether he had been asked to sign a letter criticizing social distancing regulations put in place by New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio.
He used the line to avoid answering questions about a quid pro quo with Turkey.
“Sir, were you ever told that the President was unhappy with you pursuing criminal investigations that in any way related to him?” was another question that Berman refused to answer.
“After you recused yourself, the Southern District indicted Michael Cohen, including charging him with making illegal payments, quote, ‘in coordination with and at the direction of individual one.’ When asked about this case by the Senate, Barr admitted that individual one refers to the President. Are you aware of the Attorney General’s testimony?” was another question he declined to answer.
“Given the President’s public comments attacking your office, did you have concerns you would be removed if you continued to pursue cases that the President said he didn’t like?” was yet another question he did not answer.
“Had DOJ attempted to influence your investigation of the President’s personal attorney’s associates?” he also refused to answer.
He also refused to answer multiple questions about the reported investigations into Trump attorney and former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani.
https://www.rawstory.com/2020/07/former-sdny-chief-geoffrey-berman-told-congress-i-decline-to-answer-in-response-to-27-questions/
I think all of these have significance today including the "take one for the team" jpg that has been floating around today.
Does anyone remember the Q post about them getting the evidence they needed from the Alabama special election? I couldn't find it.
Also, Dark to light, is that about today's election?
That's what I was thinking too.
I was wondering if what they collected was to be used for safeguards this time around.
I'm also wondering what a 10-day internet blackout around the November election would do to ballots. Surely an internet outage wouldn't halt elections.
I was just wondering and thinking that another method would be to dump each article as a text file in structured directories such as publisher, author, date, title, etc. You could then use directory/file search tools to make your queries.