Thanks Baker!
https://mobile.twitter.com/RealMFlynnJr/status/1333916256571953152
Full POTUS speech: 'Most Important Speech Of His Life'
(1/17)
>>>/qresearch/11877401
(2/17)
>>>/qresearch/11877416
(3/17)
>>>/qresearch/11877450
(4/17)
>>>/qresearch/11877468
(5/17)
>>>/qresearch/11877498
(6/17)
>>>/qresearch/11877523
(7/17)
>>>/qresearch/11877531
(8/17)
>>>/qresearch/11877546
(9/17)
>>>/qresearch/11877556
(10/17)
>>>/qresearch/11877568
(11/17)
>>>/qresearch/11877589
(12/17)
>>>/qresearch/11877608
(13/17)
>>>/qresearch/11877652
(14/17)
>>>/qresearch/11877673
(15/17)
>>>/qresearch/11877695
(16/17)
>>>/qresearch/11877711
(17/17)
>>>/qresearch/11877722
Not seeing all posts in Qresearch?
Put a ? at the end of the URL and all posts will show.for the bread
Like this:
https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/11959699.html?
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff States respectfully
request that this Court issue the following relief
A. Declare that Defendant States
Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin administered the 2020 presidential election in violation of the Electors Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
B. Declare that any electoral college votes cast by such presidential electors appointed in Defendant States Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin are in violation of the Electors Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and cannot be counted.
C. Enjoin Defendant States’ use of the 2020 election results for the Office of President to appoint presidential electors to the Electoral College.
D. Enjoin Defendant States’ use of the 2020 election results for the Office of President to appoint presidential electors to the Electoral College and authorize, pursuant to the Court’s remedial authority, the Defendant States to conduct a special election to appoint presidential electors.
E. If any of Defendant States have already appointed presidential electors to the Electoral College using the 2020 election results, direct such States’ legislatures, pursuant to 3 U.S.C. § 2 and U.S.CONST. art. II, § 1, cl. 2, to appoint a new set of presidential electors in a manner that does not violate the Electors Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment, or to appoint no presidential electors at all.
F. Enjoin the Defendant States from certifying presidential electors or otherwise meeting for purposes of the electoral college pursuant to 3 U.S.C. § 5, 3 U.S.C. § 7, or applicable law pending further order of this Court.
G. Award costs to Plaintiff State.
H. Grant such other relief as the Court
deems just and proper.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/docketpdf/22/22o155/162953/20201207234611533_tx-v-state-motion-2020-12-07%20final.pdf
>>>/qresearch/11993569
On SCOTUS Texas Decision (from a lawyer)
https://thedonald.win/p/11R4JGEHkU/on-scotus-from-a-lawyer/
posted 9 hours ago by TheNixonTapes +7535 / -10
Things are not over. But let me put SCOTUS into perspective.
Yes, GA, PA, MI, and WI, all violated the Constitution. All serious people concur with that assessment. But standing, objectively, was going to be difficult to assert. Texas did make a pretty creative argument, to be sure. Standing was sort of 50-50 given there is literally no precedent for this type of suit. We must commend those who stood with us, even against the odds. Everyone else, fuck 'em.
===
Apart from the Texas suit, you must keep in mind all election-related lawsuits can be distinguished by the the stage during the election period they are brought, the parties bringing them, and the court in which they are brought.
There are three defined stages to this fight: (A) pre-election litigation; (B) post-election, pre-certification litigation; and (C) post-election, post-certification litigation.
The parties relevant for our purposes are (1) POTUS in his personal capacity/Trump campaign and (2) all other third parties (e.g., state-level GOP, private citizens, such as Sidney P and L. Wood and their plaintiffs, etc.).
The courts are obviously distinguished between State (S) and Federal (F).
[I will occasionally combine these alphanumeric references to discuss particular litigation strategies. For example, a reference to an (A-1-F) lawsuit would reference a pre-election lawsuit (A) brought by POTUS (1) in Federal court (F).]
Most of the attention-grabbing litigation has been post-election, pre-certification lawsuits brought by third parties in Federal court (B-2-F). From a strategy standpoint, these suits puzzled me.
First, Federal court was always less desirable of a venue than State court, because Federal courts almost never intervene in post-election matters. (The only exception to that general rule is an appeal from a state court of last resort to SCOTUS, such as Bush v. Gore.)
Second, these (B-2-F) lawsuits sought to enjoin certification of the state election results. I am unaware of any court ever granting this type of relief. The reason no such relief has ever been granted is because the laws of almost every state require certification of results before one can file an election contest in court. (Some states also require certification as a condition precedent to requesting a recount and/or for an automatic recount to occur.)
While POTUS did attempt to stop PA and MI certifications, several factors diminished the feasibility of those suits as time progressed, a subject which I do not discuss here.
The key lawsuits to watch have always been the election contests.
First, an election contest was how Bush v. Gore got to SCOTUS, which demonstrates how these types of lawsuits present a more plausible path to SCOTUS review.
Second, standing is almost never a problem, because most state statutes only permit the candidates to bring election contests. The candidate always meets the three key requirements of standing (injury in fact, causation, and redressability).
Third, election contests must be brought in state court. Another issue with Federal court is that many of the arguments in the post-election lawsuits have focused on violations of state law. Federal courts do not interpret state law, cannot be called upon to enforce state law, and do not remedy violations of state law. The only time a Federal court examines a state law is when the court is examining whether the state law violates the Federal constitution.
Fourth, and this is the good part, POTUS has at least four active election contests that have been filed sort of under the radar:
-There is one in Wisconsin (10 EV), which the Wisconsin supreme court is set to hear tomorrow.
-There is one in Georgia (16 EV), which has a better chance of success than Sidney P or Lin Wood's suits, precisely because POTUS is a party to this suit, suing in his personal capacity.
-There is one in Nevada (6 EV), which the NV supreme court rejected, making it now prime for appeal to the SCOTUS.
-There is another one in Arizona (11 EV), which the AZ supreme court rejected, and which AZ GOP Chairwoman Kelli Ward said they were appealing to SCOTUS.
===
I would be lying to you all if I said this was not an uphill battle. It always has been. And I am always cognizant of us not turning into the "here's how Bernie can still win" type of people from 2016. But objectively speaking, it is still not over.
And I will say…
WE DESERVE OUR DAY IN COURT GODDAMMIT!
I'm guessing the ? After html works on the catalog here too
https://8kun.top/qrb/catalog.html?
Post of significance....
>>>qresearch/12178749
About Barr
>>>/qresearch/12192940
“The fact is, there is nothing to “respect” and everything to condemn about Barr’s work as a key inner circle operative throughout George Herbert Walker Bush’s rise to power, from CIA Director to Vice President to President. These aspects of Barr’s resume remain whitewashed by mainstream coverage. They have been amply documented by whistleblowers and those who worked directly with Barr.
The issue at hand is not Barr’s “legal mind”, but the ruthless mind that he wielded with frightening authority and expertise as George H. W. Bush’s treasonous hatchet man in the Justice Department. William Barr distorted and corrupted the law, as grossly as anyone in modern history.
Barr: CIA operative
It is a sobering fact that American presidents (many of whom have been corrupt) have gone out of their way to hire fixers to be their attorney generals.
Consider recent history: Loretta Lynch (2015-2017), Eric Holder (2009-2015), Michael Mukasey (2007-2009), Alberto Gonzales (2005-2007), John Ashcroft (2001-2005),Janet Reno (1993-2001), Dick Thornburgh (1988-1991), Ed Meese (1985-1988), etc.
Barr, however, is a particularly spectacular and sordid case. As George H.W. Bush’s most notorious insider, and as the AG from 1991 to 1993, Barr wreaked havoc, flaunted the rule of law, and proved himself to be one of the CIA/Deep State’s greatest and most ruthless champions and protectors:
▪ Barr was a full-time CIA operative, recruited by Langley out of high school, starting in 1971. Barr’s youth career goal was to head the CIA.
â–Ş CIA operative assigned to the China directorate, where he became close to powerful CIA operative George H.W. Bush, whose accomplishments already included the CIA/Cuba Bay of Pigs, Asia CIA operations (Vietnam War, Golden Triangle narcotics), Nixon foreign policy (Henry Kissinger), and the Watergate operation.
▪ When George H.W. Bush became CIA Director in 1976, Barr joined the CIA’s “legal office” and Bush’s inner circle, and worked alongside Bush’s longtime CIA enforcers Theodore “Ted” Shackley, Felix Rodriguez, Thomas Clines, and others, several of whom were likely involved with the Bay of Pigs/John F. Kennedy assassination, and numerous southeast Asian operations, from the Phoenix Program to Golden Triangle narco-trafficking.
â–Ş Barr stonewalled and destroyed the Church Committee investigations into CIA abuses.
â–Ş Barr stonewalled and stopped inquiries in the CIA bombing assassination of Chilean opposition leader Orlando Letelier.
▪ Barr joined George H.W. Bush’s legal/intelligence team during Bush’s vice presidency (under President Ronald Reagan) Rose from assistant attorney general to Chief Legal Counsel to attorney general (1991) during the Bush 41 presidency.
▪ Barr was a key player in the Iran-Contra operation, if not the most important member of the apparatus, simultaneously managing the operation while also “fixing” the legal end, ensuring that all of the operatives could do their jobs without fear of exposure or arrest.
▪ In his attorney general confirmation, Barr vowed to “attack criminal organizations”, drug smugglers and money launderers. It was all hot air: as AG, Barr would preserve, protect, cover up, and nurture the apparatus that he helped create, and use Justice Department power to escape punishment.
â–Ş Barr stonewalled and stopped investigations into all Bush/Clinton and CIA crimes, including BCCI and BNL CIA drug banking, the theft of Inslaw/PROMIS software, and all crimes of state committed by Bush
▪ Barr provided legal cover for Bush’s illegal foreign policy and war crimes
▪ Barr left Washington, and went through the “rotating door” to the corporate world, where he took on numerous directorships and counsel positions for major companies. In 2007 and again from 2017, Barr was counsel for politically-connected international law firm Kirkland & Ellis. Among its other notable attorneys and alumni are Kenneth Starr, John Bolton, Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, and numerous Trump administration attorneys. K&E’s clients include sex trafficker/pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, and Mitt Romney’s Bain Capital.
A strong case can be made that William Barr was as powerful and important a figure in the Bush apparatus as any other, besides Poppy Bush himself.”
http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=117511
Vary in quality is what the Notables do. Peat and repeat is inconvenient timing for holiday catch up.
Agreed, this is the 2019 sauce
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db395.htm
This statement says it all. You can search the page to find it...
NOTES: A total of 2,854,838 resident deaths were registered in the United States in 2019. The 10 leading causes of death accounted for 73.4% of all deaths in the United States in 2019. Causes of death are ranked according to number of deaths. Rankings for 2018 data are not shown. Data table for Figure 4 includes the number of deaths for leading causes.
I attached a screenshot of table 4 from
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db395-tables-508.pdf#page=4
Here is my estimate for total 2020 deaths:.
Take the 2019 weekly average to estimate the first 3 weeks in 2020
2019 deaths
2,854,838/12 =237, 903 / month
237, 903/4 = 59,476 / week
2020 deaths estimated for first 3 weeks
59,476 * 3 = 178,427
use the Covid weekly average to estimate the last week of 2020
Average weekly total deaths using 2020 Covid data
2,902,664 / 48 weeks= 60,472 /week
Estimated total deaths for 2020
2,902,664 +178,427 + 60472=
3,141,563
2018 to 2019 totals delta 15,633
2019 to 2020 totals delta 286,725
That's a pretty big difference maybe my estimate is way off, we'll know in a couple of weeks.