>>48168 pb
>>48141 pb
>>48147 pb
true that many legal and financial documents are printed on secure uv watermarked paper
The ballots in question were printed with the registration off target so that the ballots would be rejected by the vote tabulation scanners and end up being adjudicated by democrats. They might have watermarks that glow when exposed to UV light.
to come up with something around 60k adjudicated ballots - off-setting the registration would do it. if the adjudicated ballots could be analyzed would it show 60k over or under voted ballots? doubt it. The canvassing board decides the voters intent on adjudicated ballots and they are typically dems. Do they make copies of the adjudicated ballots? heard so - not good - needed to preserve and run the original adjudicated ballots through calibrated tabulator. It is standard for a printer to ask a client to sign off on registration after first print. someone who has access should ask to see it.
Maricopa County judge recuses himself from lawsuit over Senate Republicans' election audit
by Carly Roman, Associate News Editor |
The judge scheduled to oversee a legal challenge to Arizona Senate Republicans' 2020 election audit recused himself shortly before a planned hearing.
Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Christopher Coury issued an order Sunday afternoon that said he was removing himself from the case after the court received filings at 4 p.m. that mentioned new attorneys for the first time, including Chris Viskovic, who worked in Coury's office as an extern within the last five years.
Viskovic is now a junior associate at Kolodin Law Group PLLC, which is representing Florida-based cybersecurity firm Cyber Ninjas in the case, according to 12 News.
The order said the case would be reassigned but did not lay out a timeline or name a different judge.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/maricopa-county-judge-recusal-arizona-senate-republicans-election-audit