Highly cited COVID doctor comes to stunning conclusion: Gov’t ‘scrubbing unprecedented numbers’ of injection-related deaths

3,544 deaths and 12,619 serious injuries reported between Dec. 14, 2020 and April 23, 2021

One of the world’s most prominent medical doctors with expertise in treating COVID-19 has gone on the record with a scathing rebuke of the U.S. government’s approach to fighting the virus. He says the government’s strategy, carried out in cooperation with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the United Nations World Health Organization, has resulted intens of thousands of unnecessary deaths and is now being followed up with thousands more deaths caused by a mass-injection program.

Dr. Peter McCullough, in a 32-minute interview with journalist Alex Newman, said if this were any other vaccine it would have been pulled from the market by now for safety reasons.

McCullough holds the honor of being the most cited medical doctor on COVID-19 treatments at the National Library of Medicine, with more than 600 citations. He has testified before Congress and won numerous awards during his distinguished medical career.

Between Dec. 14 and April 23, there were 3,544 deaths reported to the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System [VAERS], along with 12,619 serious injuries.

One might expect these numbers would trigger an exhaustive investigation from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. But the opposite has occurred. According to McCullough, the government has taken what amounts to a passing glance at the alarming numbers and dismissed them with a bare minimum of scrutiny.

“A typical new drug at about five deaths, unexplained deaths, we get a black-box warning, your listeners would see it on TV, saying it may cause death,” McCullough said. “And then at about 50 deaths it’s pulled off the market.”

The U.S. has a precedent for this. In 1976 during the Swine Flu pandemic the U.S. attempted to vaccinate 55 million Americans, but at that point the shot caused about 500 cases of paralysis and 25 deaths.

“The program was killed, at 25 deaths,” McCullough said.

[long article, see CAP]

https://leohohmann.com/2021/04/30/highly-cited-covid-doctor-comes-to-stunning-conclusion-govt-scrubbing-unprecedented-numbers-of-injection-related-deaths/

see also this article on Dr. M getting banned by YT last fall:

https://aapsonline.org/youtube-censors-top-doctor/

Pfizer doc confirms ‘Covid Vaccine Shedding’ leading to ‘Menstrual Cycle Disruption’ and ‘Miscarriage’ is possible via ‘skin-to-skin contact’ and ‘breathing the same air’

5-4-2021

Hundreds if not thousands of women have reported that they have suffered irregular bleeding/clotting after receiving one of the mRNA Covid vaccines.

Sadly hundreds of others have reported the loss of their unborn child. However we are now also seeing hundreds of testimonies made by women who are saying that they have lost their unborn child or suffered irregular bleeding/clotting after being in the company of others who have received one of the mRNA Covid vaccines.

Sounds unbelievable doesn’t it? Well unfortunately a Pfizer document confirms that these farfetched reports are perfectly possible.

With reports like this being made it is extremely interesting and concerning to find that hidden within this Pfizer document:

‘A PHASE 1/2/3, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, RANDOMIZED, OBSERVER-BLIND, DOSE-FINDING STUDY TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, IMMUNOGENICITY, AND EFFICACY OF SARS-COV-2 RNA VACCINE CANDIDATES AGAINST COVID-19 IN HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS’

Contains a whole section covering the possibility of ‘mRNA vaccine shedding’ in which it is possible for those who have been in close proximity of someone who has had the Pfizer mRNA jab to suffer an adverse reaction.

In section 8.3.5 of the document it describes how exposure during pregnancy or breastfeeding to the Pfizer mRNA jab during the trials should be reported to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of investigator awareness.

This is strange because pregnant women / new mothers were and are not part of the safety trials. So how can they be exposed?

Well Pfizer confirms that exposure during pregnancy can occur if a female is found to be pregnant and is environmentally exposed to the vaccine during pregnancy.

The document states that environmental exposure during pregnancy can occur if a female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after having being exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact.

Or if a male family member of healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to or around the time of conception.

In layman’s terms Pfizer are (sic) admitting in this document that it is possible to expose another human being to the mRNA Covid vaccine just by breathing the same air or touching the skin of the person who has been vaccinated.

https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/05/04/pfizer-confirms-covid-vaccine-shedding-leading-to-menstrual-cycle-disruption-is-possible/

The New Nuremberg Trials 2021

https://t.me/WFAorg/1449

A team of over 1,000 lawyers and over 10,000 medical experts led by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich have begun legal proceedings against the CDC, WHO & the Davos Group for crimes against humanity.

Fuellmich and his team present the faulty PCR test and the order for doctors to label any comorbidity death as a Covid death asfraud.

The “vaccine” ie gene-therapy (genoccine) fails to meet the following five requirements to be considered a vaccine:

• Provides immunity to the virus

• Protects recipients from getting the virus

• Reduces deaths from the virus infection

• Reduces circulation of the virus

• Reduces transmission of the virus

Main emphasis in this thread is on the idea that the germ theory is false.

I'm adding in the best of the talks and articles on Covid policies/ideas bc they all or almost all based on the idea that the germ theory is real. So - relevant imo.

https://youtu.be/hYtLT3pUEo4

Interview by Jean-Pierre De Villiers with Nick Hudson, organizer of PANDA

PANDA = Pandemic Data & Analytics

They fight against lockdowns, mask mandates, mandatory vaccination.

45 mins

5-4-2021

PANDA was established in South Africa, grew from there

was in response to growing covid hysteria, from early on

Thought economic consequences of lockdown - much worse than effects of virus

Everything that was being done in SA was being done in connection with WHO, Gates, GAVI

So they became internationalized

Want to replace bad science with good science

People haven't given themselves permission to question lockdowns

Every previous pandemic response policy was violated by late March

No cost-benefit analysis of lockdowns - not just economic but others

They tried to quantify those costs in a paper -

but later, realized there was a more basic issue: the wrongness of lockdowns.

Govt's have hired psychologists to purposely make people afraid.

Masks have no impact on transmission - only on the psychology of the public.

Constant reminder of "newly and deadly virus" (but it's not new or particularly deadly).

"Lockdowns have not resulted in the savings of lives. It's terrible."

Fear is more dangerous than smoking in terms of a person's health - a year of fear.

An artificially created co-morbidity.

Doesn't believe this is a conspiracy, but it's worse than that.

• We've cultivated a culture of "Safety-ism"

• There's been a going away from debate, freedom of express (cancel culture)

• Ideology of centralization - world control

• Malthusianism - belief that population growth must be stopped

What about forcing people to get vaccines?

NO. Also against vaccine passports.

Thinks we need to be kind to those who are afraid, patiently educate them.

But also ridicule those who make silly policies.

Laugh together.

We want people to just get moving again, don't want to arouse fear.

Calls this the fight agains the "mal-archy" (malarkey)

Don't be afraid of risk. Life is full of risk. Restore agency to your life.

"Life without risk is not worth living."

Another video with Nick Hudson (March 2021):

https://vimeo.com/532172876

26 mins

removed from YT after a half a million views

PANDA started out as a conversation among 4 friends - md, lawyer, investor, economist

Nick is the investor/actuary.

>>51002

The ugly truth about the Covid-19 lockdowns by Nick Hudson

https://vimeo.com/532172876

This vid is even better than recent interview

Excellent, excellent slides - great REDPILL.

This guy is really good at tearing apart the illogical arguments used by Fauci and others. He's an actuary - and you have to be really good at statistical analysis for that.

Premise behind current covid policies:

You are presumed to be sick unless you can prove you are healthy.

Ridiculous.

Asymptomatic transmission.

Also ridiculous.

Lockdowns

Bruce Elwood goes to China and says then that everyone should follow their response to the virus. NO.

Previous policies w/pandemics

Isolation of the sick and hand washing are what work - not lockdowns.

Sweden vs UK (no lockdown vs lockdown):

NO DIFFERENCE in incidence of daily deaths.

S Dakota vs N Dakota

South Dakota did BETTER than N Dakota.

Dangers of lockdowns

suicides, educational disruption, lockdowns make things worse (well-known data)

Dangers of Masks

Before June 5, universal masking was discouraged by WHO; suddenly reversed their policy.

Very, very flaky science. Contradicts everything we know from studies of using masks to try to reduce flu transmission.

Masks v No Masks

States with and without mask mandates: NO DIFFERENCE

Big vaccines

BIG PHARMA pushing this narrative for profiteering.

'''Looming vaccine passport - and fear of future (long covid, reinfection, variants...)

FEAR pushed to an absurdity. We must push back against it.

The very underpinnings of our civilization are under threat here.

"We've been pushed up against a precipice."

Read the Great Barrington Declaration.

https://gbdeclaration.org/

>>51002

>>51002

Nick Hudson:

Doesn't believe bad covid policies are due to a conspiracy, but to these factors:

• Cultivation of a culture of "Safety-ism"

• Departure from real debate, freedom of expression (cancel culture)

• Ideology of centralization - world control

• Malthusianism - belief that population growth must be stopped

Interesting argument

Why?

Because it nicely sidesteps the msm attack against "conspiracy theorists"

Hudson says "no conspiracy" but lists ideas and developments that promote bad covid policies

NOT NECESSARY to say it's organized, right?

Shift the narrative to looking at the value of these ideas and developments.

Very, very smart.

Sharyl Attkisson investigates Covid-19 origins

VID plus info.

https://rumble.com/vg1ujt-exclusive-sharyl-attkisson-investigates-covid-origins.html

Key Points:

• Numerous scientific insiders are signing onto the “lab origin” theory for Covid-19 and a link to controversial research funded by your tax dollars.

• High profile health figures who have worked to “debunk” lab origin questions are linked to funding and vaccine research partnerships with China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).

• The U.S.- Chinese research involved genetically engineering bat coronavirus to make it infect human airway cells in mice, in order to invent vaccines and other therapeutics.

• U.S. taxpayer money supported the controversial vaccine research with Chinese scientists through the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). Some support came from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), led by Dr. Anthony Fauci.

See CAP for all informational materials plus clean transcript.

https://sharylattkisson.com/2021/05/video-exclusive-investigation-separating-rumor-from-fact-on-covid-19s-origin/

COVID Vaccines: Necessity, Efficacy and Safety

Doctors for Covid Ethics

5-5-2021

This paper was originally hosted on the Doctors for Covid Ethics Medium account, but the platform censored the expert group and removed the paper, claiming the post was “under investigation”:

Archived version:

https://web.archive.org/web/20210501011529/https://doctors4covidethics.medium.com/covid-vaccines-necessity-efficacy-and-safety-b1d8bfbc9d2

Abstract:

COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers have been exempted from legal liability for vaccine-induced harm. It is therefore in the interests of all those authorising, enforcing and administering COVID-19 vaccinations to understand the evidence regarding the risks and benefits of these vaccines, since liability for harm will fall on them.

Necessity: Immunocompetent individuals are protected against SARS-CoV-2 by cellular immunity. Vaccinating low-risk groups is therefore unnecessary. For immunocompromised individuals who do fall ill with COVID-19 there is a range of medical treatments that have been proven safe and effective. Vaccinating the vulnerable is therefore equally unnecessary. Both immunocompetent and vulnerable groups are better protected against variants of SARS-CoV-2 by naturally acquired immunity and by medication than by vaccination.

Efficacy: Covid-19 vaccines lack a viable mechanism of action against SARS-CoV-2 infection of the airways. Induction of antibodies cannot prevent infection by an agent such as SARS-CoV-2 that invades through the respiratory tract. Moreover, none of the vaccine trials have provided any evidence that vaccination prevents transmission of the infection by vaccinated individuals; urging vaccination to “protect others” therefore has no basis in fact.

Safety: The vaccines are dangerous to both healthy individuals and those with pre-existing chronic disease, for reasons such as the following: risk of lethal and non-lethal disruptions of blood clotting including bleeding disorders, thrombosis in the brain, stroke and heart attack; autoimmune and allergic reactions; antibody-dependent enhancement of disease; and vaccine impurities due to rushed manufacturing and unregulated production standards.

In short, the available evidence and science indicate that COVID-19 vaccines are unnecessary, ineffective and unsafe.

more.....

https://off-guardian.org/2021/05/05/covid-vaccines-necessity-efficacy-and-safety/

>>>/qresearch/13600239

May 6, 2021

Latest CDC VAERS shows 4178 Americans DEAD following experimental COVID jabs

Deaths from COVID Shots now Equal 20 Years of Recorded Deaths Following Vaccines Since 2001

The CDC has just released the newest total of deaths reported following the experimental COVID shots since they were granted emergency use authorization (EUA) in early December through May 3, 2021, and that total now stands at 4,178 deaths reported to VAERS. The number of deaths recorded following the experimental COVID injections now equals the total number of recorded deaths following vaccines for the past 21 years. The next target for these killer injections are children, as Pfizer has applied for emergency use authorization with both the FDA in the U.S., and the EMA in Europe, to inject 12 to 15 year olds with their experimental COVID mRNA shots. FiercePharma has reported that Canada has just approved the Pfizer shot for 12 to 15 year olds.

It was announced on Pfizer's website today.

And the majority of the world's population seems to be oblivious to the fact that genocide is happening right in front of our eyes, and prefer instead to believe the government "health authorities" who are lying and telling everyone this really isn't happening.

https://medicalkidnap.com/2021/05/05/cdc-4178-americans-dead-following-experimental-covid-injections-deaths-from-covid-shots-now-equal-21-years-of-recorded-deaths-following-vaccines-since-2001/

listened to this last night - pretty mindblowing, these MD's pull no punches.

Drs Tenpenny, Palevsky, Northrup, Madej, Merritt

Five MDs agree: CV-19 jabs are BIOWEAPONS

5-5-2021

comments by Brian Shilhavy

Editor, Health Impact News

Ever since reports have surfaced in recent days that people who have chosen NOT to receive the experimental COVID-19 shots but have been exposed to those who have received them, and have suffered what appear to be infections coming from these fully “vaccinated” people, affecting mainly women who have reported menstruation difficulties, heavy bleeding, miscarriages, and reduction of breast milk, I have been watching my newsfeed to see if any of the dissenting doctors and scientists we feature regularly here at Health Impact News would address these issues.

Fortunately, a team of 5 doctors in the U.S....just held a round-table discussion a couple of days ago to address these issues.

The issues they discuss affect ALL of us in the U.S. (and around the world) right now, and it is imperative that you take 79 minutes of your time to watch this video....

they also give practical advice at the end about what we can be doing right now to protect ourselves and stop this attack on the human race by the Globalists seeking to reduce the world’s population.

Every single one of these doctors believe that these shots are NOT vaccines, but bioweapons designed to kill human beings.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/i2fMnrMH3Zm3/

WATCH THIS VIDEO

what's in these 'vaccines' anyway?

if they divulged the formula, what would we see?

Pfizer and Moderna CEOs speak out as shares plummet after Meghan and Harry back Biden move to waive vaccine patents for poorer countries

• Suspending patent enforcement for vaccines 'will not increase the number of doses' this year, BioNTech CMO Dr Özlem Türeci told CNN

• The Biden administration said Wednesday it supports a global push to temporarily waive patent protections

• Prince Harry and Meghan Markle penned a letter to vaccine makers calling on them to suspend the protections, which keep their formulas secret

• It would allow poorer countries to access the formula for vaccines like those made by Pfizer and Moderna

• Pfizer CEO said 'it is so wrong' to suspend patent protection

• Moderna agreed not to enforce its Covid vaccine patents in October and said it is unconcerned that its vaccines won't sell

• Even without patents blocking other countries from making shots, they will face massive hurdles in the supply chain and manufacturing of vaccines

• The global agreement is still in a holding pattern because member nations including the UK, Canada and the EU have not signed on

• Biden's patent waiver support has triggered the first major clash between the U.S. and Germany since Biden took office. Chancellor Merkel opposes waivers

Pfizer has hit out at the Biden administration's support for waiving intellectual property protections to allow poorer countries to produce vaccines developed by companies like it and Moderna, potentially cutting into the firms' profits.

It comes just hours after Prince Harry and Meghan Markle penned an open letter to vaccine makers urging them to suspend the patent protections to help developing countries gain access to the shots.

Shares for vaccine makers Pfizer and Moderna tumbled on Thursday, following the Biden administrations announcement that it supports waiving the protections during the pandemic.

'It is so wrong,' Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla said of Biden's support of waivers on legal protections to keep his firm's Covid vaccine formula secret in a Wall Street Journal interview.

Pfizer has spent the past year securing supply lines and ramping up production for the vaccine, and punishing the firm by taking away firms' exclusive rights to their vaccine formulas would discourage biotech companies from creating treatments and innoculations for future pandemics, Bourla told the outlet.

On Tuesday, Pfizer said it had made $3.46 billion in first-quarter vaccine sales. The New York Times estimated that would come out to about $900 million in pretax profits from vaccines in the past three months alone. ...

[there's much more, but too much is drivel from the usual suspects....good charts, tho - see CAPS]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-9551225/Pfizer-hits-Biden-administration-vaccine-patent-waivers.html

The novel coronavirus’ spike protein plays additional key role in illness

Salk researchers and collaborators show how the protein damages cells, confirming COVID-19 as a primarily vascular disease

LA JOLLA—Scientists have known for a while that SARS-CoV-2’s distinctive “spike” proteins help the virus infect its host by latching on to healthy cells. Now, a major new study shows that the virus spike proteins (which behave very differently than those safely encoded by vaccines) also play a key role in the disease itself.

The paper, published on April 30, 2021, in Circulation Research, also shows conclusively that COVID-19 is a vascular disease, demonstrating exactly how the SARS-CoV-2 virus damages and attacks the vascular system on a cellular level. The findings help explain COVID-19’s wide variety of seemingly unconnected complications, and could open the door for new research into more effective therapies....

In the new study, the researchers created a “pseudovirus” that was surrounded by SARS-CoV-2 classic crown of spike proteins,but did not contain any actual virus.

Exposure to this pseudovirus resulted in damage to the lungs and arteries of an animal model—proving that the spike protein alone was enough to cause disease. Tissue samples showed inflammation in endothelial cells lining the pulmonary artery walls....

https://www.salk.edu/news-release/the-novel-coronavirus-spike-protein-plays-additional-key-role-in-illness/?s=09

So the Spike Protein causes serious damage.

The same spike protein used in ALL FOUR FAKE VAXXES

>>62181

this video is dynamite, notes below.

Cassandra Dunn

Registered nurse & certified Federal medical investigator.

The covid swab is dipped in carcinogenic, mutagenic ethylene oxide (EO)

Used for sterilization purposes.

There are 2 dif swabs:

1. ninbo (sp?) - made in China - says "sterile/EO"

2. mariclean technology (sp?) - "sterile/EO"

The swab is inserted deep into the nasal cavity, near the brain.

So what is EO? ethylene oxide

Per US EPA:

• human CARCINOGEN.

• exposure via inhalation

• can can lymphoma & breast cancer, other cancers

• is also MUTAGENIC

Acute inhalation in workers has resulted in all kinds of serious conditions including:

nausea, vomiting, neurological disorders and others

There is an increased rate of miscarriages, reproductive effects, decreased sperm count.

HHS:

EO damages DNA - why it's effective as sterilizer

Canadian version of OSHA:

EO is very toxic, causes cancer, changes in genetics & reproduction, genetic defects, known to cause reduced fertility

Some state workers where she lives have to get this test done DAILY, deep into your nasal cavity, close to the brain.

"I don't know what to say, people, this shit's for real, I can't make this up."

her website:

purplelionproject.com

>>62213

short wiki-dig on EO:

EVERYTHING IN "THE SWAB" VIDEO IS BACKED UP BY OFFICIAL SOURCES

Wikipedia:

• The International Agency for Research on Cancer classifies ethylene oxide into group 1, meaning it is a proven carcinogen.

• Ethylene oxide is toxic by inhalation, with a US OSHA permissible exposure limit calculated as a TWA (time weighted average) over 8 hours of 1 ppm, and a short term exposure limit (excursion limit) calculated as a TWA over 15 minutes of 5 ppm.

• Because the odor threshold for ethylene oxide varies between 250 and 700 ppm, the gas is already at toxic concentrations when it can be smelled. Even then, the odor of ethylene oxide is sweet, aromatic, and can easily be mistaken for the pleasant aroma of diethyl ether, a common laboratory solvent of very low toxicity. In view of these insidious warning properties, continuous electrochemical monitors are standard practice, and it is forbidden to use ethylene oxide to fumigate building interiors in the EU and some other jurisdictions.

this guy is really good!

Exposes the WBCSD - World Bus Council for Sustainable Development

they say we gonna need a CLIMATE LOCKDOWN!!

and we gonna need it in the "near future"

They call Covid 19 the "disease of the anthropocene"

Anthropocene = humanity

Humanity itself is a DISEASE that needs to be wiped out so big corps can "reinvent capitalism" and do whatever they want.

https://twitter.com/wakeupfromcovid/status/1403019148679077895

CDC to hold an "emergency meeting" on "higher-than-expected" cases of heart inflammation following COVID-19 vaccination - CBS

https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1403133557803991041

• • • • • -

CDC plans "emergency meeting" on rare heart inflammation following COVID-19 vaccines

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention announced Thursday that it will convene an "emergency meeting" of its advisers on June 18th to discuss rare but higher-than-expected reports of heart inflammation following doses of the mRNA-based Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines.

posted this mp4 earlier, now in covid thread here: >>61937

notice in this video how the host and the MD is trying to minimize any cardiac problems associated with the vax - but later in the day, we hear about this "emergency meeting." So this is NOT normal and they know it.

But how could they not known?

It's already known that Sars-CoV-2 can affect the heart - because there are ACE-2 receptors there:

Abstract

A new type of pneumonia caused by a novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks recently in China and spreads into many other countries. This disease, named as COVID-19, is similar to patients infected by SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, and nearly 20% of patients developed severe condition. Cardiac injury is a prevalent complication of severe patients, exacerbating the disease severity in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), the key host cellular receptor of SARS-CoV-2, has been identified in multiple organs, but its cellular distribution in human heart is not illuminated clearly. This study performed the first state-of-art single cell atlas of adult human heart, and revealed that pericytes with high expression of ACE2 might act as the target cardiac cell of SARS-CoV-2. The pericytes injury due to virus infection may result in capillary endothelial cells dysfunction, inducing microvascular dysfunction. And patients with basic heart failure disease showed increased ACE2 expression at both mRNA and protein levels, meaning that if infected by the virus these patients may have higher risk of heart attack and critically ill condition. The finding of this study explains the high rate of severe cases among COVID-19 patients with basic cardiovascular disease; and these results also perhaps provide important reference to clinical treatment of cardiac injury among severe patients infected by SARS-CoV-2.

https://academic.oup.com/cardiovascres/article/116/6/1097/5813131

Since the spike protein goes all over the body, it goes to the heart, too. WHY WOULD IS NOT CAUSE INFLAMMATION?

https://t.me/worlddoctorsalliance/6485

[Forwarded from Mike Yeadon]

SAGE has some modelling of deaths especially the fully vaccinated.

Sounds scary, yes? BUT the modelling is based on an ASSUMPTION. An assumption that variants arise which “escapes immunity”.

In other words, they’ve no idea whether anything untoward will happen.

If their “guess” about variants isn’t correct, bin the whole thing.

And will a variant that “escapes immunity” arise?

The empirical data speaks strongly AGAINST it. We’re still at around 0.3% total mutation away from the original sequence.

In 18 months.

So, around 0.2% per YEAR.

Recall that those infected by & left immune to SARS in 2003?

They all had cross-immunity to SARS-CoV-2, which is 22% different.

Let me say it again.

The human immune system EASILY sees two viruses which differ by 22% as similar enough that immunity to one confers immunity to the other.

Now ask yourself, considering the same immune system:

if it easily copes with a 22% difference, what do you think the chances are that a 0.3% difference will NOT be recognised by our immune systems??

Yes, that’s right. It’s ZERO. It’s impossible. It is not going to happen.

They’re STILL LYING TO US ABOUT EVERYTHING.

Why? Because it’s not about a virus & our health, but about total control.

They’ve absolutely no intention of “giving us back our freedoms”. What an absurd concept, anyway.

All around the world, hidden from many of us by the LYING MASS MEDIA, people in other places are living entirely normal lives, forgetting about Covid19.

We get one chance to wrest back self determination: DO NOT TOLERATE A DAY LONGER OF THIS OFFENSIVE, ROAD MAP BS.

If you meekly comply with any further restraints, you’re telling government & their advisors that THEY CAN DO DO TO US WHATEVER THEY WANT.

It’s down to us. Please take everything back on June 21st, if you haven’t already.

Dr Mike Yeadon'''

>>62118, >>62119, >>62120 , >>62121, >>62122 Does the 21st Century Cures Act Allow the Government to Bypass Informed Consent for Experimental Vaccines?

https://twitter.com/RWMaloneMD/status/1402739522970996743

https://trialsitenews.com/does-the-21st-century-cures-act-allow-the-government-to-bypass-informed-consent-for-experimental-vaccines/

Excerpts:

Back in 2016 when the 21st Century Cures Act was signed into law (December 13, 2016), the mission, among other things, was to accelerate medical product development to support the expedited commercialization of new innovative advancements to the bedside of patients. No one can oppose such an important goal, but patient safety is of course sacrosanct and infused into the underlying clinical research mission.

When introduced by the 114th Congress, Section 3024 of the Act stated, “Clinical testing of investigational medical devices and drugs no longer requires the informed consent of the subjects if the testing poses no more than minimal risk to the subjects and includes safeguards.”

The importance of informed consent and the Declaration of Helsinki cannot be overstated for anyone that knows the history of research. This particular clause ultimately couldn’t have remained in this version for the finalized legislation and indeed upon review of Section 3024 of the Act.

“ INFORMED CONSENT WAIVER OR ALTERATION FOR CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS.

(b) DRUGS.—Section 505(i)(4) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(i)(4)) is amended by striking ‘‘except where it is not feasible or it is contrary to the best interests of such human beings’’ and inserting‘‘except where it is not feasible, it is contrary to the best interests of such human beings, or the proposed clinical testing poses no more than minimal risk to such human beings and includes appropriate safeguards as prescribed.”...

FDA’s Point of View on the Act’s Waiving Informed Consent

On July 2017, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued guidelines for implementation of the rules, which seemingly waves key aspects of federal law for human research subject projection.

For example, the FDA noted in accordance with 21 CFR 10.115(g)(3) that the agency didn’t bother to seek any prior comment from the public.

According to the language, the Gold Standard agency determined that prior public participation is “not feasible or appropriate because this guidance presents a less burdensome policy that is consistent with the public health.” This was the justification for waiving key aspects of fundamental human research subject protection law and policy without so much as a public hearing.

To the FDA’s credit, they did acknowledge that the agency remained subject to public comment in accordance with 21 CFR 10.115.

Were the modifications implemented a few years ago just “business as usual,” intended to establish more friendly conditions for expediting research and development?

Or are they serious encroachments on a human subject’s expectations for true and transparent informed consent as has been defined in the Belmont Report and the Declaration of Helsinki, a cornerstone of subject safety arising ultimately out of the horrors of World War 2?

>>64463

Pfizer & Moderna Fail To Respond To British Medical Journal About COVID Vaccine Safety Concerns

June 19, 2021

An article published in the British Medical Journal by Dr. Peter Doshi titled “Covid-19 Vaccines: In The Rush for Regulatory Approval, Do We Need More Data?” raises concerns regarding COVID-19 vaccine rollout, and one of them is the bio-distribution of the vaccine.

This refers to the examination and study of where the vaccine and its ingredients go once injected into the body.

Having sped up the approval process of these vaccines, it has been claimed that no compromises in the process of examining their safety were made. But the fact that no study for tracking the distribution of the vaccine within the human body was conducted for any of the authorized vaccines, we cannot say this is true.

Dr. Doshi points out that such bio-distribution studies are a standard practice of drug safety testing but “are usually not required for vaccines.” This in itself is concerning.

Research regarding the bio-distribution of aluminum containing vaccines, for example, have raised concerns about injected aluminum crossing the blood brain barrier and being distributed throughout the body where it can be detected years after injection. This is important, because vaccines are a different method of delivery than say, ingested aluminum, which the body does a great job of getting rid of through digestion.

Bio-distribution studies weren’t performed for COVID vaccines because data from past studies performed with related, and “mostly unapproved compounds that use the same platform technology” were used to bypass them.

Dr. Doshi points out that,

“Pfizer and Moderna did not respond to The BMJ’s questions regarding why no biodistribution studies were conducted on their novel mRNA products, and none of the companies, nor the FDA, would say whether new biodistribution studies will be required prior to licensure.”

In his article, Dr. Doshi also references a report that Pfizer provided to the Japanese government. In the report there is a table containing lipid nanoparticle bio-distribution data.

This table shows where their surrogate “vaccine” (i.e. represented in the laboratory test by little bubbles of surrogate fat containing an analytical detection marker) ended up in the body of immunized rats, used in the laboratory as surrogates for humans…I would like to highlight some observations. First…a lot of the surrogate vaccine dose remained at the injection site, as one would expect.

Remarkably, however, most of the vaccine dose had gone elsewhere….50-75% of the vaccine dose failed to remain at the site of injection.

The big question is, where did it go?

Looking at the other tissues shows some of the paces it went and accumulated…The surrogate vaccine was circulating in the blood. There is also evidence that a substantial amount of the vaccine went to places like thespleen, liver, ovaries, adrenal glands, and bone marrow. The vaccine went to other places as well, such astestes, lungs, intestines, kidneys, thyroid glands, pituitary gland, uterus, etc. The surrogate vaccine tested in a laboratory setting was widely distributed throughout the laboratory animal’s bodies. – Dr. Byram W. Bridle, Viral Immunologist, University of Guelph.

page 1

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/06/no_author/pfizer-moderna-fail-to-respond-to-british-medical-journal-about-covid-vaccine-safety-concerns/

>>64489

The above quote comes from a detailed report Bridle recently released for COVID-19: “A Vaccine Guide For Parents.” One of his main concerns is that the spike protein that our cells manufacture after injection enter into the bloodstream, and that the spike protein itself isn’t harmless. He goes into a detailed explanation in the report cited above.

According to him,

This information is incredibly important because recent data have come to light that the spike protein is “biologically active.” This means that the spike protein is not just an antigen that is recognized the immune system as being foreign. It means that the spike protein, itself, can interact with receptors throughout the body, called ACE2 receptors, potentially causing undesirable effects such as damage to the heart and cardiovascular system, blood clots, bleeding, and neurological effects.

Again, the report is quite detailed and you can access it here if you’re interested. Bridle is not the only one raising these concerns. He, like many other professionals out there, have been subjected to “fact checking” via Facebook third party fact checkers. Here’s a response from PolitiFact regarding Bridle’s claims and the science he points to.

PolitiFact claims that there is no evidence that the spike protein is ‘a toxin.’ They cite opinions from the CDC and other researchers claiming that no evidence has yet emerged stating the spike protein is dangerous. But they are not actually addressing the cited science Bridle is pointing to, they are merely saying everything he is saying is wrong.

This type of baseless ‘fact checking’ has been a problem during the entire pandemic. A recent article published in the British Medical Journal by journalist Laurie Clarke has highlighted the fact that Facebook has already removed at least 16 million pieces of content from its platform and added warnings to approximately 167 million others. YouTube has removed nearly 1 million videos related to, according to them, “dangerous or misleading covid-19 medical information.”

The article explains why fact-checking scientists has been nothing short of censorship of both evidence and educated opinion. This has happened numerous times throughout the pandemic with multiple renowned scientists. I recently wrote about a couple of examples here, and here, if you’d like to dig deeper.

It’s telling when science, evidence and opinions of experts are censored and subjected to ridicule throughout a global event like this. One has to ask: what is the motivation? Does a clear headed society seek to censor?

Any narrative that questions what we are receiving from government, health authorities, and mainstream media have been completely unacknowledged. Effectively dividing the public on important issues.

Once again, this begs the question, why? You would think it a time like this discussion and evidence would be shared openly and transparently, instead, we’ve seen the exact opposite.

Reprinted with permission from Collective Evolution.

JUST PUBLISHED! The definitive review on ivermectin - it works - now let's use it!

https://twitter.com/BIRDGroupUK/status/1406280350444265474

==Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 Infection

A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis to Inform Clinical Guidelines==

Bryant, Andrew MSc1,*; Lawrie, Theresa A. MBBCh, PhD2; Dowswell, Therese PhD2; Fordham, Edmund J. PhD2; Mitchell, Scott MBChB, MRCS3; Hill, Sarah R. PhD1; Tham, Tony C. MD, FRCP4Author Information

American Journal of Therapeutics: June 17, 2021 - Volume Publish Ahead of Print - Issue -

doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000001402

Abstract

Background:

Repurposed medicines may have a role against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The antiparasitic ivermectin, with antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties, has now been tested in numerous clinical trials.

Areas of uncertainty:

We assessed the efficacy of ivermectin treatment in reducing mortality, in secondary outcomes, and in chemoprophylaxis, among people with, or at high risk of, COVID-19 infection.

Data sources:

We searched bibliographic databases up to April 25, 2021. Two review authors sifted for studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Meta-analyses were conducted and certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach and additionally in trial sequential analyses for mortality. Twenty-four randomized controlled trials involving 3406 participants met review inclusion.

Therapeutic Advances:

Meta-analysis of 15 trials found that ivermectin reduced risk of death compared with no ivermectin (average risk ratio 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.19–0.73; n = 2438; I2 = 49%; moderate-certainty evidence). This result was confirmed in a trial sequential analysis using the same DerSimonian–Laird method that underpinned the unadjusted analysis. This was also robust against a trial sequential analysis using the Biggerstaff–Tweedie method. Low-certainty evidence found that ivermectin prophylaxis reduced COVID-19 infection by an average 86% (95% confidence interval 79%–91%). Secondary outcomes provided less certain evidence. Low-certainty evidence suggested that there may be no benefit with ivermectin for “need for mechanical ventilation,” whereas effect estimates for “improvement” and “deterioration” clearly favored ivermectin use. Severe adverse events were rare among treatment trials and evidence of no difference was assessed as low certainty. Evidence on other secondary outcomes was very low certainty.

Conclusions:

Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally.

https://journals.lww.com/americantherapeutics/Abstract/9000/Ivermectin_for_Prevention_and_Treatment_of.98040.aspx

https://t.me/AmericasFrontlineDoctors/190

America's Frontline Doctors

Dr. Simone Gold

@drsimonegold

'''How much more evidence does the

average person need before they

REFUSE to listen to the CDC?'''

This is not informed consent. This is a

public marketing campaign.

#ProtectYourRights

AFLDS.org

Mt Wake Up From COVID wakeupfromcovid

THE CASE OF IVERMECTIN

Last week @PierreKory & @BretWeinstein sat down /vith (cpjoerogan for an "emergency podcast" on ivermectin, censorship and, basically, the future of the world as we know it. An essential watch to understand :he obscure times we are living in. 1/2

Even if ivermectin ends up being not effective (which is absurd based on the data), its proven safety record of over 40 years is essential to reveal to any open minded individual that the WHO has betrayed the population and is not acting on their behalf. WAKE UP! 2/2

https://twitter.com/wakeupfromcovid/status/1409584466528378891

Link to the one-hour interview:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/qHjNQIynVb5O/

(removed from YT)

It's official!

USA's Nationwide Blood Donor Seroprevalence Survey shows huge NATURAL herd immunity was achieved BEFORE mass jab rollout.

49.1% of population had antibodies by 21 Mar 2021 (yet only 13.9% had jab).

Natural immunity halted the pandemic - not jabs.

@FatEmperor

https://twitter.com/CCollated/status/1408347000878292993

https://t.me/covid_vaccine_injuries/4428

Covid Vaccine Injuries

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/06/uk-people-dying-

covid-today-vaccinated-please-continue-take-vaccine/

The Gateway Pundit

UK: Most of the People Dying from COVID Today are Vaccinated - But Please Continue to Take Your Vaccine

The Guardian reported this week that a majority of the recent COVID deaths in the UK had received the COVID vaccination.

FDA Adds Heart Inflammation Warning to Pfizer, Moderna COVID Vaccines as Some Experts Call for Full Approval

'''The U.S. Food and Drug Administration added a warning to fact sheets — as advised by the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices — for Pfizer and Moderna COVID vaccines indicating an increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis following vaccination.

The FDA’s update followed a review of information and discussion by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) meeting on June 23 where the committee acknowledged 1,200 cases of heart inflammation in 16- to 24-year-olds and said mRNA COVID vaccines should carry a warning statement.'''

“The data presented at this meeting reinforced the FDA’s decision to revise the fact sheets and further informed the specific revisions,” the FDA said in a statement.

Health officials said the benefits of receiving a COVID vaccine still outweigh any risks. Physicians and other public commenters accused the CDC during the meeting of exaggerating the risk to young people of COVID, and minimizing the risk of the vaccines.

Dr. Meryl Nass, an internal medicine physician, pointed out several flaws in the data used during the ACIP’s presentation:

“As of now, two major ways the rate of myocarditis were minimized [during the presentation] was to lump people from age 39 and down — even though the highest rates [of myocarditis] are in the youngest kids. This waters down the rate. The other method was to only include a very narrow window of time after vaccinations started in the 12-15 age group, thus omitting the vast majority of second doses, which is when about 75% or more of the myocarditis cases occur. Also, the genders were sometimes mixed. And rates in girls are much lower than boys.”....

During the CDC’s presentation, Dr. Megan Wallance stated the overall efficacy of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine in the 12 to 15 age group is 100% and Moderna’s was comparable. Wallace then did a risk/benefit analysis comparing myocarditis cases versus hospitalization rates for COVID in people between the ages of 12 and 29....

According to The Hill, calls are rising from some experts for the FDA to fully approve COVID vaccines, as some unvaccinated people view current Emergency Use Authorizations for vaccines as an indicator they are experimental and not fully tested.....

Full approval of COVID vaccines will likely lead to more employee mandates. Boston Herald, a major hospital in Boston, announced June 24 it would require more than 80,000 Mass General Brigham employees be vaccinated against COVID once one of the three vaccines gain approval from the FDA.

According to the Los Angeles Times, the city of San Francisco announced last week it would require its 35,000 employees to get vaccinated against COVID or risk losing their jobs. ....

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/fda-heart-inflammation-warning-pfizer-moderna-covid-vaccines/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=0acc339b-ba32-4c96-bb71-674ecda44e33

'False positive' Covid tests created by schoolchildren using fruit juice

PARENTS are being warned after children are reportedly using fruit juice to create "false positives" on COVID-19 tests.

Kids have taken to social media channels, including TikTok, to demonstrate how the acid breaks the test and produces a positive result. It is believed children at schools across the country have used drinks like orange juice to make it appear they have the deadly virus.

Gateacre School in Belle Vale, Liverpool, asked pupils in years 7, 8, 9 and 10 not to attend this week as some students tested positive, but there is no evidence they used fruit juice to create the "false positive".

The school did warn parents to be "vigilant" though, after becoming aware of the trend nationally.

The email, which was seen by Liverpool Echo, read: "Nationally, some school students have discovered that placing droplets of orange juice or other fruit juice on an LFD test gets a false 'positive' result.

"In light of this, can you be extra vigilant when your child is doing their LFD tests. Also, remind them that a positive LFD test must be followed by a confirmatory PCR test."

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1454464/Covid-tests-fruit-juice-acid-children-schools-Gateacre-School-Liverpool

just when you think things can't get any stranger....

https://twitter.com/PissedPatriot60/status/1409976979332415490?s=20

[Daughter participated in vax trials, now disabled in constant pain]

They will not pay for the treatment, they have signed documents to be volunteers and guinea pigs. Think about it...

These young children with their entire lifes in front of them are getting it stolen and stripped from them, being left disabled and killed for 'science'.