Anonymous ID: 2b7c92 April 30, 2021, 5:41 a.m. No.49639   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9643

peekin in yo's

this shit is not ever gonna go away, we have to social censure it to the garbage bin so we need to get busy

strange guud for dat

kek

Anonymous ID: 2b7c92 April 30, 2021, 5:43 a.m. No.49640   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9641 >>9642 >>9652 >>9667 >>9675

@IranWireEnglish

 

reports this morning officers from the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) Intelligence Unit raided the offices of President Hassan Rouhani and Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif. #ZarifGate #Iran

Anonymous ID: 2b7c92 April 30, 2021, 5:55 a.m. No.49648   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>49644

that mofo was a stoner dudes

kudos for his deep thought but surely ya'll recognize when that sheitz go off the realm of real

I mean, we could kill the whole universe with infection, right?

Anonymous ID: 2b7c92 April 30, 2021, 6:29 a.m. No.49654   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Former Acting Assistant Attorney General for National Security Mary McCord who helped steward the ill-fated, false Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant application in 2016 against then-Trump campaign advisor Carter Page—alleging he and then candidate Donald Trump were Russian agents—has been named an amicus curiae advisor to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, according to Georgetown Law ICAP.

 

Established under 50 U.S. Code § 1803(i) in the 2015 USA Freedom Act, which replaced the Patriot Act, the amici curiae advisors have as their duties to provide “legal arguments that advance the protection of individual privacy and civil liberties; information related to intelligence collection or communications technology; or legal arguments or information regarding any other area relevant to the issue presented to the court.”

 

Since the FISA Court lacks any defense counsel to remind the judge that it is wholly unconstitutional to spy on American citizens, it is a one-sided affair where the Justice Department presents evidence to justify spying on American citizens. No crime needs to have been committed, just show evidence that the individual may have been in contact with a foreign power via an agent or official, and then the FISA Court can authorize access to your phone calls, emails, text messages and other documents, and also those of contacts and contacts’ contacts.

 

The amici curiae are supposed to act as a stand-in for defense counsel. In the case of McCord, however, who helped steward the Carter Page FISA warrant across the finish line in Oct. 2016, is this a case of a fox guarding the hen house?

 

The allegations originated from the DNC and the Hillary Clinton campaign, who hired Fusion GPS and former British spy Christopher Steele to produce the fake dossier, and then were forwarded to the FBI, who initiated the investigation, resulting in an Oct. 2016 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant against then-Trump campaign advisor Carter Page, his contacts, and his contacts’ contacts. It gave the government access to campaign emails, phone calls, text messages and other communications.

 

The warrant was renewed three times even after Jan. 2017, when the FBI learned that Steele’s source had contradicted him when questioned by the FBI. According to Justice Depatment Inspector General Michael Horowitz’ report, once the main source that Steele used was contacted, “the Primary Sub-source made statements during his/her January 2017 FBI interview that were inconsistent with multiple sections of the Steele reports, including some that were relied upon in the FISA applications. Among other things, regarding the allegations attributed to Person 1, the Primary Sub-source’s account of these communications, if true, was not consistent with and, in fact, contradicted the allegations of a ‘well-developed conspiracy’…”

 

Instead, the Justice Department doubled down. Per Horowitz, “However, we found no evidence that the Crossfire Hurricane team ever considered whether any of the inconsistencies warranted reconsideration of the FBI’s assessment of the reliability of the Steele reports or notice to OI before the subsequent renewal applications were filed. Instead, the second and third renewal applications provided no substantive information concerning the Primary Sub-source’s interview…”

 

And through it all, McCord was at Justice through April 2017, when it had already been approved three times, even as the Justice Department surely knew its case was falling apart.

 

https://dailytorch.com/2021/04/former-doj-official-who-helped-get-false-trump-russia-fisa-against-carter-page-approved-named-as-fisa-amicus-curiae/