dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

Anonymous ID: d7fcc2 April 30, 2021, 3:22 p.m. No.49793 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>9806

>>49792

noice

slowly stretchin, wakin up

howza

chasin the other q like

>>49790

Charter of the C_A? FOREIGN (NOT DOMESTIC (FORBID LAW))

[OPEN ACCESS - PAY FOR PLAY]?

[38.89511, -77.05144]

Who signed?

Cold on the outside?

Think [F] intel.

Define [clandestine].

Langley Verification?

Game theory.

If you look you can see.

Locked & Loaded.

Is [It] really closed?

Was it ever closed?

What are they trying to prevent?

Who are they trying to protect?

Who benefits the most?

Money buys POWER.

[Dragonfly]

Think MSM daily attacks [losing ground].

[CLAS 1-99: future]

Something BIG…

They can no longer hide in the shadows.

What event(s) change the news cycle?

There is a price we will not pay.

_Conf_BECZ_y056-(3)_y

There is a point beyond which they must not advance.

The silent ones.

576847584903257849302578432574839

SILENCE WILL NOT LAST FOREVER.

WILL GUIDE.

>>49796

>>49795

dragonfly platform (cloud)

>>49798

Google search engine for CCP.

https://www.startpage.com/sp/search?query=576847584903257849302578432574839&cat=web&pl=opensearch&language=english

member we were to check into acct quarterly reports

showed loss of income from stopping dragonfly

acct fuckery then

Define 'stage set'.

What does FEAR look like?

The message must be direct.

DzpRF05XcAAv49t

3028

{C3109DFE-6544-46D6-92EA-271FB77F6378}

>>49803

Anonymous ID: d7fcc2 April 30, 2021, 4:20 p.m. No.49807 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>9810

>>49805

thanks for that, member seein it, also member next quarter was not available on time

>>49803

Rachel Maddow’s defense to OAN defamation lawsuit is that on-air statements shouldn’t be considered fact

MSNBC host Rachel Maddow is defending herself in court by claiming her statements on air should not be taken as fact.

https://www.bizpacreview.com/2019/12/28/rachel-maddows-defense-to-oan-defamation-lawsuit-is-that-on-air-statements-shouldnt-be-considered-fact-869161/

>>49812

lets set the panic dial up to 11shall we?

A liddle help for the moist b.i.tch kek!!

=NCSWIC - ALREADY OUT FOR THE PUBLIC TO VIEW WITH 24/7 EYES ON BY THE PATRIOTS==

PDF to ballet audit below !!!

https://www.cyberninjas.com/static/20210429155650/Wake-TSI-Counting-Floor-Policies.pdf

James Madison, hailed as the father of our Constitution, is probably turning over in his grave given the shredding of our God-given constitutional values and principles upon which we were founded.

Madison recognized that since concentrating power leads to tyranny, dividing government power was essential for the preservation of liberty. He will never be accused of being short-sighted about the threats government would pose to the people.

Madison and others set out deliberately to design a form of government that would limit abuses and withstand the test of time. America now faces that test, and the central question that has emerged is: Will we pass the test, or will we fall into the abyss of history as other nation-states have done?

Along with other framers of our nation’s Constitution, Madison argued for dividing federal power among the three branches of our government — legislative, executive, and judicial. These should be studied and clearly understood by every American schoolchild from an early age, but to our nation’s and our children’s detriment, they are not.

And what is even less understood is why the Founders adopted a structure that they knew would result in conflict among the branches. In truth, the constitutional structure was designed not to enhance the efficiency of the government but to impede the exercise of raw governmental power and to protect the liberty of the people.

Separation of powers is not a flaw in our system of government, as many demanding changes increasingly assert. It is purposely designed to protect our constitutional republic from the tyranny of a few — tyranny that today is knocking down the door of America.

Contrast the original design chosen by our framers with the intemperate statements of President Biden, who demands Congress yield to his will on matters such as gun control, under the threat that he will usurp the role of Congress by signing executive orders.