oss habbing fun wid dem bans....
wuz der playin in da sandbox a bit
anon got post deleted by asking this question next door
guess it kinda backfired on bv.....
>>>/qresearch/13860806
How do you keep it shut down?
How do you get ahead of what is coming?
V2 Varient?
Are they stupid enough to try it again?
when does the first alarm bell ring?
https://www.eip-ca.com/presโฆ/2-21-cv-00032_Complaint-1.pdf
to Q or not to Q? That is the Question.
https://www.eip-ca.com/press_releases/2-21-cv-00032_Complaint-1.pdf
see CAP.
link is incomplete, i found the complete link.
references a legal complaint.
Those bringing the suit apparently want a forensic audit in California.
Great idea!
good question.
posted it next door too -
and what a quick response it got!
FOUR posters immediately jumped me coz "not Q."
Like there's some kind of official position that must be taken....
hahahaha......
this looks like an article on the original January filing:
https://www.tylerbursch.com/press-release/press-release-lawsuit-filed-in-federal-court-to-end-californias-corrupt-election-process
not an article, a press release.
from QResear.ch:
"Robert Tyler, Partner at Tyler & bursch, LLP and President of Advocates for Faith & Freedom....."
From the press release:
Tyler & Bursch provides legal and financial support to their non-profit, pro bono law firm, Advocates for Faith & Freedom in defense of constitutional and religious liberty.
www.faith-freedom.com
from the website for Advocates for Faith & Freedom:
https://faith-freedom.com/home
"Advocates for Faith & Freedom is a non-profit law firm dedicated to protecting constitutional and religious liberty in the courts.
Our mission is to engage in cases that will uphold our religious liberty and Americaโs heritage and to educate Americans about our fundamental constitutional rights. We recognize that America was founded on Judeo-Christian principles. In todayโs culture, that foundation is slowly being eroded by legal challenges to traditional family structure, religious freedom, basic property rights, and parental rights, and by other court decisions that have created a society increasingly devoid of the message and influence of God."
The suit on election fraud isn't listed on the website afaik
Could be that it is 'stuck' somewhere in the process atm.
stalling expected.
if this is a Q, brought up for a reason.
mebbe part of the general focus on how AZ results will affect other states - Cali pointed out as a state where this is already a push to do forensic exam (which might be un-stalled if AZ pans out)?
uh.....
ideal for ebot thread a few breads back.
figured it wasn't the only one - and bet they are ALL stalled to some degree or another. no standing or motions brought to bog things down, exhaust patriot side, etc.
Won't work.
Too many red-pilled patriots now who know the consequences of inaction.
ebot is very entertaining and occasionally even profound
der's a human puppeteer in der somewhere
alas not all anons appreciate ebot style of humor
i 'member
we started out on end with one shill with this post - always cracked me up
later, more arrived
but so did anons
too bad gerbil went off the deep end
grandiosity is a bitch
i knows - u arrived way past me
here's another jokey post from qr
must be in a funny mood tonite jus like las nite -
everything cracks me up
>aei
yes he was there - bigtime
liked to post the really annoying gifs
was here on qrb too, haven't seen for awhile
MOAR KEKS
https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1402367931615518724
see circled part of survey
RealJamesWoods
Can a person be any more evasive? Itโs not that hard of a question.
https://twitter.com/RealJamesWoods/status/1402314893710090243
BIZARRO
Look at the interviewer's face - u can see the whites of the eyez!!
Cleveland Clinic Study: No need to vaccinate those whoโve already had COVID-19
June 8, 2021
A new study by the Cleveland Clinic has found that individuals who have previously been infected with COVID-19 receive no additional benefits from vaccination.
The study was conducted on 52,238 employees in the Cleveland Clinic. A positive RT-PCR test was considered to define COVID-19 infection. The participants received two doses of the Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna COVID-19 vaccine at an interval of 28 days. A participant who tested positive for COVID-19 at least 42 days before the vaccination initiation was considered previously infected.
During the course of the study, infection occurred almost exclusively in participants who were not previously infected and were not vaccinated.
No significant difference in COVID-19 incidence was observed between previously infected and currently vaccinated participants.
Not a single incidence of COVID-19 infection was observed in previously infected participants with or without vaccination.
Based on the study findings, COVID-19 vaccination should be prioritized for individuals who have not had prior COVID-19 infection.
A ZOE COVID Symptom Study recently found that individuals with previous COVID-19 infection were 2x more likely to experience adverse reactions post-vaccination. Another recent study also found that individuals with prior COVID-19 infection more frequently reported side effects.
https://breaking911.com/cleveland-clinic-study-no-need-to-vaccinate-those-whove-already-had-covid-19/
what's really pathetic is that there has to be a STUDY to tell us this.
sounds suspiciously like an effort to make SCOTUS feel like they are being watched at all times. Intimidation.
took a long time to post, kept posting endlessly then error message