Kek
Lyrics:
OUTTAYERDAMINDE
Oh my, heavy times
Everybody's angry, living lies
And you broke joke woke folk
Think you're gonna save the day
You've gone outtayerdaminde, kids
Nobody cares about what you say
So you scream "oh please, look at me!"
Living through an iPhone TikTok dream
Rate me, date me, grade me, pay me
Begging for attention, boo hoo
You've gone outtayerdaminde, kid
Nobody cares about what you do
Want to play the victim?
Want to be the hero?
Lookin' like a miserable confused weirdo
Think you've got it figured out for everybody else
When you don't even know yourself
All your selfies ain't no revolution
They're slowing down our evolution
I s'pose I need to apologize
And if I don't you'll hope and wish I die
Oh cool, another rule
Made up by a teenage rebel who loves
Big tech, big pharm, big gov, big laws
Gonna talk about it on their new blog
You've gone outtayerdaminde, kid
Nobody cares 'bout what you want
So you cry "not true, I'll fact check you"
Getting your opinion approved
By some desperate, faceless, nameless, brainless,
Intern writer for the fake news
Hey, you're outtayerdaminde, kid
Nobody cares about what they say
Think you got a voice?
Think you got a choice?
Think you're something special
In the corporate white noise?
Tweet this, post that, gram this, Tok that
Swipe left, tap here, tube this, not that
You think that they're on your side?
They only share what they decide.
You're just part of the corruption
That's peddling crap for mass consumption
Oh geez, you labeled me
You're tolerance is so extreme
Which one do I get to be?
A fascist, bigot, or nazi?
You're outtayerdaminde kid
'Cause I don't care 'bout what you think
Oh my, heavy times
Everybody's angry, living lies
And you broke joke woke folk
Think you're gonna save the day?
You've gone outtayerdaminde, kids
Nobody cares about what you say
You've gone outtayerdaminde, kid
Nobody cares about what you say
You've gone outtayerdaminde
Nobody cares about what you say
The Real Story - OAN Maricopa Audit Deadline with Christina Bobb
June 18, 2021
Rumble — Christina Bobb, OAN’s political correspondent, gives us The Real Story on the final days of the Maricopa Audit and what we can expect next.
https://rumble.com/vipzaf-the-real-story-oan-maricopa-audit-deadline-with-christina-bobb.html
>>>/qresearch/13937749
The National Security Agency has agreed to produce records about the FBI’s illegal snooping on 16,000 Americans, according to a letter that I received from the NSA this afternoon, and that suggests a political fight between the two agencies.
The NSA replied to the exact same request Clevenger provided to the FBI where he received the response it would take the FBI decades to respond. Below is the NSA’s letter:
https://populist.press/bombshell-nsa-revealed-the-fbi-committed-massive-crimes-against-americans/
The National Security Agency has agreed to produce records about the FBI’s illegal snooping on 16,000 Americans, according to a letter that I received from the NSA this afternoon, and that suggests a political fight between the two agencies.
>>>/qresearch/13937778
BY ZACHARY STIEBER June 19, 2021 Updated: June 19, 2021
The National Security Agency (NSA) has agreed to release records on the FBI’s improper spying on thousands of Americans, the secretive agency disclosed in a recent letter.
The agreement may signal a rift between the NSA and the FBI, according to attorney Ty Clevenger.
Clevenger last year filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request on behalf of The Transparency Project, a Texas nonprofit, seeking information on the FBI’s improper searches of intelligence databases for information on 16,000 Americans.
The searches violated rules governing how to use the U.S. government’s foreign intelligence information trove, U.S. District Judge James Boasberg, an Obama nominee who currently presides over the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, wrote in a 2019 memorandum and order that was declassified last year.
The FBI insisted that the queries for all 16,000 people “were reasonably likely to return foreign-intelligence information or evidence of a crime because [redacted],” Boasberg wrote. But the judge found that position “unsupportable,” apart from searches on just seven of the people.
Still, Boasberg allowed the data collection to continue, prompting Elizabeth Goitein, co-director of the Liberty and National Security Program at the Brennan Center for Justice, to lament that court’s decision on the data collection program, authorized by Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), “is even more inexplicable given that the opinion was issued shortly after the government reported submitting FISA applications riddled with errors and omissions in the Carter Page investigation.”
Page was a campaign associate of then-candidate Donald Trump who was illegally surveilled by the FBI.
After the judge’s order was made public, Clevenger filed FOIA requests for information on the improper searches with both the FBI and the NSA.
The FBI rejected the request. In a February letter (pdf), an official told Clevenger that the letter he wrote “does not contain enough descriptive information to permit a search of our records.”
The NSA initially declined the request as well, but later granted an appeal of the decision, Linda Kiyosaki, an NSA official, said in a letter (pdf) this month.
“You had requested all documents, records, and other tangible evidence reflecting the improper surveillance of 16,000 individuals described in a 6 December, 2019, FISC Opinion,” Kiyosaki wrote.
Clevenger believes the NSA’s new position signals a rift between the two agencies, potentially because the FBI has repeatedly abused rules governing searches of the intelligence databases while the NSA has largely not.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/nsa-agrees-to-release-records-on-fbis-improper-spying-on-16000-americans_3865431.html?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=gp
:Pfizer & Moderna Fail To Respond To British Medical Journal About COVID Vaccine Safety Concerns'
June 19, 2021
An article published in the British Medical Journal by Dr. Peter Doshi titled “Covid-19 Vaccines: In The Rush for Regulatory Approval, Do We Need More Data?” raises concerns regarding COVID-19 vaccine rollout, and one of them is the bio-distribution of the vaccine. This refers to the examination and study of where the vaccine and its ingredients go once injected into the body. Having sped up the approval process of these vaccines, it has been claimed that no compromises in the process of examining their safety were made. But the fact that no study for tracking the distribution of the vaccine within the human body was conducted for any of the authorized vaccines, we cannot say this is true.
Dr. Doshi points out that such bio-distribution studies are a standard practice of drug safety testing but “are usually not required for vaccines.” This in itself is concerning. Research regarding the bio-distribution of aluminum containing vaccines, for example, have raised concerns about injected aluminum crossing the blood brain barrier and being distributed throughout the body where it can be detected years after injection. This is important, because vaccines are a different method of delivery than say, ingested aluminum, which the body does a great job of getting rid of through digestion.
Bio-distribution studies weren’t performed for COVID vaccines because data from past studies performed with related, and “mostly unapproved compounds that use the same platform technology” were used to bypass them.
Dr. Doshi points out that,
“Pfizer and Moderna did not respond to The BMJ’s questions regarding why no biodistribution studies were conducted on their novel mRNA products, and none of the companies, nor the FDA, would say whether new biodistribution studies will be required prior to licensure.”
In his article, Dr. Doshi also references a report that Pfizer provided to the Japanese government. In the report there is a table containing lipid nanoparticle bio-distribution data.
This table shows where their surrogate “vaccine” (i.e. represented in the laboratory test by little bubbles of surrogate fat containing an analytical detection marker) ended up in the body of immunized rats, used in the laboratory as surrogates for humans…I would like to highlight some observations. First…a lot of the surrogate vaccine dose remained at the injection site, as one would expect. Remarkably, however, most of the vaccine dose had gone elsewhere….50-75% of the vaccine dose failed to remain at the site of injection. The big question is, where did it go? Looking at the other tissues shows some of the paces it went and accumulated…The surrogate vaccine was circulating in the blood. There is also evidence that a substantial amount of the vaccine went to places like the spleen, liver, ovaries, adrenal glands, and bone marrow. The vaccine went to other places as well, such as testes, lungs, intestines, kidneys, thyroid glands, pituitary gland, uterus, etc. The surrogate vaccine tested in a laboratory setting was widely distributed throughout the laboratory animal’s bodies. – Dr. Byram W. Bridle, Viral Immunologist, University of Guelph.
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/06/no_author/pfizer-moderna-fail-to-respond-to-british-medical-journal-about-covid-vaccine-safety-concerns/
NSA Sullivan: 90-Day COVID Origin Review ‘Will Give Us Some More Clarity’ – Need to Continue ‘Public Pressure’ for Transparency from China
18 Jun 2021
On Friday’s “CBS This Morning,” National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan stated that the 90-day intelligence review on the origins of COVID-19 ordered by President Joe Biden will provide “some more clarity” and we ultimately need access to China, which requires us “to continue to raise the public pressure and do so in a concerted way with allies and partners.”
Sullivan said, “Well, there are two facets to this. One facet is the intelligence community analysis that President Biden asked our intelligence experts to undertake, that’s a 90-day review where we are scrubbing everything we have in terms of our intelligence and where we’re reaching out to allies and partners around the world. That will give us some more clarity. The second facet is what you’re describing, which is ultimately, we need access and the international community needs access to China to be able to get that initial data that will tell us the most about where this virus came from and how it entered into the world. And you’re right, so far China has said, no, we won’t allow that. But we just can’t take the no lying down. We have to continue to raise the public pressure and do so in a concerted way with allies and partners. And that’s why it was so important that at the G7 the world’s democracies came together to insist on a phase-two investigation in China of the origins of COVID-19.”
https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2021/06/18/nsa-sullivan-90-day-covid-origin-review-will-give-us-some-more-clarity-need-to-continue-public-pressure-for-transparency-from-china/