>>6896

>I'm actually pretty happy Q is staying on QR. We get to go there and watch the posts, and the circus, then come back and do our work here. This is awesome.

yeah i can see this. but we also have an opportunnity to rethink what our work is. dig, meme, pray? i don't know. shits had the fuck dug out of it already. can any oldfag here honestly say that theyve seen a major NEW dig recently. most of the shit dug these days is rehashed in this anons opinion. fucking epstein and such has been dug to death. course we are able to tie shit together (future proves past - but that is basically secretarial work). we shit memes out at a ridiculous rate. this is why so many oldfags (read oldfags as the smart fuckers) have been disengaged since the captcha, and even before. perhaps we need to rethink our mission. not saying it aint dig, meme, pray. but perhaps we should be looking to challenge ourselves a bit. clearly we need to be on point for the 2020 election cycle. but what happens after that? every corruption cleanup cycle in history has fallen far short (just read the histories of the kings of israel and judah - fucking textbook for failed cleanups). one thing we might become are the long term protectors of righteousness. and to do that we would need to dig continually, meme forcefully and pray without ceasing.

just some thought from your local philosophyfag. do with it what you will.

>>7001

>And don't you think the linchpin to being the protectors is a trusted operational capability?

i do. but the anon aspect is huge. organize along traditional lines and you get auto corruption and it start immediately. so the ops capability comes out of being able to aim at common goals and recognize those that would subvert those goals. bo, bakers, bvs etc...are nice and all. but that shit is mostly for the normies, newfags and others that lack the processing power to deal with what goes on here in the raw. this one was easy cuz 8bit prepped it. but i think we could move to a new board cold and the essential oldfags would find it. perhaps not what you had in mind, but the capability to recognize and find each other is key to operational inegrity in my opinion. processes cant save us.

pic relevant

>>7005

>Gotta be honest, you kinda talked in circles and i have no idea what you're getting at.

not the first time ive hear this anon. philosophy will do that to you (and its done it to me long ago). perhaps the following will help. and perhaps not. well see.

consider anything new and shiny. take MAGA and what were helping implement. its pretty new and still pretty damn shiny in this anons opinion. now suppose we win. and keep winning and take over the world, so to speak, by restoring our constitutional republic. once that happens that shit has to be administered. it has to be managed. and the more it gets managed by middle managers (for most of whom i have the utmost contempt because of what they are - and I know because I pretended to be one for many years in the biggest of big corporates). it becomes political (and i mean that differently than politics). compromise happens of necessity. and eventually that shit becomes exacty what it replaced. a corrupt nest of self-enriching bureaucrats. anything but smart as fuck anon oversight will get corrupted as well in my opinion. my question is can we do anything now and going forward to create a counterweight to the tendency of well meaning organizations to degrade into shit holes.