>>7002

Your comment seems to involve the authority under which Epstein is being kept (obviously). Is it correct that Epstein was arrested ON a plane? Does that mean he was not in a US jurisdiction or that he was not under the same jurisdiction as he would have been had he gotten off the plane and left Teterboro airport. We have the President's comment (apparently) about taking over the airports.

Here are some screen caps that I think are related. Interesting to see the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey mentioned. Look where it is headquartered. Also notice how the airports are connected via the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey.

Begs the 9/11 connection in my mind.

>>7156

This might give you some potential connections to look at: https://www.coreysdigs.com/clinton-foundation/shipwrecked-on-ten-islands-with-clintons-branson/

>>7216

The accusation has been made that he's Mossad. I don't have ANY sauce for that. I'd guess that would make him Israeli (or employee of Israeli intelligence) in addition to American, if that is true.

>>7248

I figured that as a wealthy "elite" Epstein preferred a smaller airport. I was rather guessing that the airport was one he frequented for his convenience. Kind of like those people who keep their private planes in small airports here and there.

>>7259

Q indicated that deals were made, but "no deal", too (if I remember correctly). What if some of the baddies were able to pick a time of arrest or other detail in order to hasten prosecution of others.

>>7252

Are we still in a post-9/11 "War on Terror"? The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey had jurisdiction over Teterboro Airport and WTC, too, didn't it? Or is that pretty much irrelevant?

>>7284

I do not yet understand the term "alloidal" property. However, this much I do know: It is morally wrong for the same entity that sends us our tax bill to 'asses' our property as "worth more" in fiat money, therefore to KEEP our property we must continually pay INCREASING taxes just to stay in a place we supposedly own.

Anon, I think it is good to have this conversation. I have an idea that most liberty seeking people have similar ideas. Yes, I think we are de facto planning what comes NEXT.

I think that Q was informing us (what we already knew) that freedom is ours for the taking. (Hence Q posting the opening to the Declaration of Independence so many times)The failing, irredeemably corrupt system has to go or it will take us with it. Many people made an oath to uphold the Constitution. I believe that the freedoms innumerated in the Constitution are OURS. Ironically, to protect the Constitution we need to reconstitute the government.

>>7387

Wow. That seems like a treasonous plea. Asking foreign intelligence to interfere in the US seems a bad idea.

>>7380

I know, this is completely unacceptable to me as well, plus totally unconstitutional.

>>7370

I believe in the non-violent tenor of this board, but I think something similar to what you envision can happen and without destructive force.

A PP clinic (have to look for the story) closed due to public pressure in one of the southern states. They were unable to find a new location.

Bottom line: The public employees and such that you figure we could shoot "every last one of them" are people with families and some of them would probably like a better alternative than the unconstitutional mess we are now in.

Sure, I've envisioned a group of armed patriots "rousting" the employees out of a PP and sending them packing, but public opinion shifting makes a lot of difference. I think we have no idea how many of our fellow citizens in all walks of life feel just as eager for freedom as we do. Let's not "blow it up" with violent posturing on a public board.