tyf
morn'n baker call'n the ball
kitch is staffed.
eyes on
notables bun @40
baker on radio silence for a while
#489
>>79936 TGIF planefagg'n
>>79938 Robinhood Soars As Firm Holds Insider Sales Until SEC Approves
>>79915, >>79916, >>79917, >>79919, >>79922, >>79928 (Live) Corona-committee mini-bun
>>79909 Study Finds Greater Antibody Response In Recovered COVID-19 Patients Than Vaccinated Ones
>>79907 POLL: Parents ‘unlikely’ to get their children vaccinated against COVID-19, citing risks of vaccine adverse reactions
>>79906 It’s official. Matt DePerno is running for Attorney General in Michigan.
heard this last night but couldn't post till now. too bizzy. great info on refusing the vax and legal backup.
https://defendingtherepublic.org/covid/
excerpt:
Your Option to Refuse is based on Federal law over EUAs[10]. No one has the right to mandate an EUA approved vaccine.
Your Right to Informed Consent[11] is separate from the Option to Refuse, and is also based on Federal law over EUAs.
The most recent relevant court decision in relation to an injunction application on an Emergency Authorized Vaccine (EUA) vaccine was Doe v. Rumsfeld, Civil Action No. 03-707, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5573, *2-3, 2005 WL 1124589, where the United States District Court for the District of Columbia required that the EUA anthrax vaccine be only administered in the military on a voluntary basis “pursuant to the terms of a lawful emergency use authorization (“EUA”) pursuant to section 564 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.” This decision, as the earlier decision in Doe v. Rumsfeld, 297 F. Supp. 2d 119 also found the EUA could not be mandated; recognizing the option to refuse under federal law governing EUAs.
To be clear, the EEOC’s guidance updated on May 28, 2021, related to language suggesting that vaccines may be “required” by employers, only states that “federal EEO laws do not prevent an employer from requiring all employees physically entering the workplace to be vaccinated…”[12] This is called a word game or word salad.
This is a limited statement which does not include other federal law, specifically 21 USCS § 360bbb-3 under the Food Drug and Safety Act, discussed above, which requires that EUA’s are administered with the option to refuse and the right to informed consent, which requires both the benefits and the negatives of an EUA vaccine.
EEOC guidance relates to Title VII and discrimination laws, which for example does not relate to other potential lawsuits, such as under the ERISA statute at 29 U.S.C. 1132(a)(1(b) for arbitrary and capricious health plans mandating vaccines. Deciding that you choose a COVID-19 vaccine is a medical question to made with your doctor — not because of a mandate from an employer.
EEOC guidance recognizes that you may have a religious or medical exemption. Religious exemption, for example, can apply to those who oppose abortion based on their faith because the Johnson & Johnson vaccine, (the Jansen vaccine), uses retinal cells from a fetus that was aborted in 1985 and treated in a lab since; the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines test the mRNAs on fetal cell lines from an aborted fetus from 1973[13].
There is Potential Liability on Employers or Universities that Mandate Vaccines if an Employee or Student suffers any Side Effects or Death from a mandatory EUA vaccine.
continues on site...
we scan'n yer phone now cuz pr0n...
Apple to Begin Scanning All iPhones for Images of Child Sexual Abuse
https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2021/08/06/apple-to-begin-scanning-all-iphones-for-images-of-child-sexual-abuse/
better note dis fugg'n comms baker
AFn sheitz