Anonymous ID: 213f10 Aug. 14, 2021, 11:25 p.m. No.82721   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2723 >>2728 >>2739

How do you capture a very dangerous animal?

Do you attack it from the front?

Do you walk through the front door?

Do you signal ahead of time you will be attacking?

Anons will figure out what I'm doing long before targets.

 

Here I set a puzzle: >>80231 (pb)

And I pointed here for a starting point: https://8kun.top/qrb/res/65079.html#65187

Subsequently I set out some mini-puzzles to aid in solving the bigger one, but also to illustrate core ideas. (Tip: each puzzle is answered in next puzzle post.)

Here I asked for a Q number hidden in the target post: >>80421 (pb).

The answer is 23... the "same variable" was shifted from 2 to 3 in the target post.

Possible takeaway: an established codephrase might be just slightly concealed as a marker to those looking.

Perhaps a sign to dig deeper?

Here again I ask for a hidden Q number: >>80566 (pb).

The answer is 55.

All decodefags know those numbers, right?

In the first case, the number was concealed in the text of the post.

In this case, a posted image contained the start of a poem, and the code number was "slightly concealed" in the next line of the poem.

If you take the step of reading further, and also happen to be on the lookout for Q codeprases....

...then you might notice that "twice five" is 5:5.

Possible takeaway: look for actual comms in external material that you are perhaps getting pointed towards.

Many anons know to research the topics Q ever so slightly points at.

But how many look for further comms?

 

[argumentative interlude]

The "no outside comms" rule is flagrantly violated.

Everyone (who is halfway competent at decodes) gets that Dan Scavino drops Q comms, no?

Mike Pompeo is only slightly less obvious. (I like the one where he expresses astonishment at his son's admission to occasional intentional misspellings.)

[ergo?]

 

Third mini puzzle: >>81350 (pb)

I asked for a known Q-phrase that had a double connection to the posted image.

The answer was RIG FOR RED.

The image posted highlights her red hair.

But you can easily ascertain that the pic is from Botticelli's Birth of Venus.

Venus is arising from the sea (born all at once, so to speak).

And "Rig for red" is a submariner command used to prep the sub for ascent to periscope depth.

So... two different pointers to arising from the sea, no?

Possible takeaway: in examining "outside comms", look for multiple independent connections.

And didn't Q first say that on the day of his return from a long absence?

 

Fourth mini puzzle: >>81399 (pb)

The meme posted is derivative of Van Gogh's Starry Night.

Aragorn says: One does not simply walk into Mordor.

That's what Aragorn says in the context of Mordor and memes, right?

Hold (ever so slightly) the question of where I might be going with either of those answers. You'll see.

The possible takeaway is that "irrelevant" information might not be such.

For a "case study" take: https://qagg.news/?q=%23%232762&primother=+

In the meme Q replies to, the actor is Clint Eastwood.

Is Q invoking Dirty Harry? Not so obvious from Q post per se.

The film is Gran Torino, where he comes to guide a wayward Hmong youth who tries to steal his car. Again, no connects.

But that's just a negative example. Perhaps such questions sometimes yield surprising answers.

 

This is the fifth mini puzzle, though it deviates from form.

I have no new "reload" for the Initial Target Post (atm...)

(https://8kun.top/qrb/res/65079.html#65187), but instead a new graphic (BOOM).

My new "puzzle" has three parts.

What does the graphic "say"... at least on the surface.

In the graphic, I am intentionally being less "explicit" than I might be.

But for any anon who looks closely, the surface meaning should become clear.

(Of course it might be objectionable or apparently misguided or... whatever... take your hits...)

But now for part two: In what book does Feynman describe his participation in the Manhattan Project?

Reply with an image.

Part three: what if I had included that image in the graphic itself?

Might I have then offered a dastin interpretation of "follow the pen"?

THINK.

EXPAND IT.

The first two parts are not so difficult if you resolve to do the work.

The third part is not so difficult for one who resolves to do the first two.

 

You might deem it impossible that any real comms are hidden in bewb pics and discussion thereof.

Treat the word "impossible" as nothing more than motivation.

Anonymous ID: 213f10 Aug. 15, 2021, 12:03 a.m. No.82730   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2737

>>82723

>evenin' puzzle anon

 

>have a fren who's very good w/puzzles

 

>but not an anon

 

>;-}.

https://youtu.be/B5T7Gr5oJbM?t=21

https://qagg.news/?q=%23%232344

:)