>>83546 (pb)

Posted late pb but baker requested repost...

Here's my thinking...

Prior anon caught the DS post (@9:42pm) and linked it to Q2142:

https://twitter.com/DanScavino/status/1427445612212015104

>>83416 (pb)

But I'm thinking that in this case, Q942 (=normie time) also packs a punch, inasmuch as it contains a marker that Q used when he actually namechecked Dan. I mean the "3 second" marker:

https://qagg.news/?read=4527

I wonder if this means that Dan means to confirm that he is actively providing Q comms or is meant to be a signal to anons of some sort?