>>86010 pb
"They don't even need a severely deadly virus"
According to the '89 book on the "New World Order"
The initial virus was planned to be weak, according to ths book covered in this short vid.
"Operation Lockstep" from Rockefeller Playbook
anon wonders if that book is a hoax.
Have no time now but would look into the publication history and the author.. Looks like it'd be a good dig?
It does predictive programming in detail to what's going on now.
One young woman rplied to me "But we'd have to attack the Arabs eventually anyway."
Majority that I approached didn't care about the Wars overseas either.
For 9/11 it was mostly about belief.
First denial, is you don't believe it.
Next step (once you prove it)
"What does it matter"
The "What does it matter" folks are the ones who will first pretend they have info that proves you wrong
"But my neighbor down the street.....lal la la"
When you find out they are lying / bluffing that's when "What does it matter" comes out.
Some I'm sure know, but hate you for having the courage to say it out loud, when they never would.. They secretly are afraid when the the truth should ever come out that you would become "egotistical"
The parallel denial of the importance of the illegal wars oversea ties into this, since 9/11 was the pretense.
They had to admit there were wars overseas but could just deny the truth of 9/11; because that was the consensus viewpoint - that it was as presented, and we were attacked.
Same with the people who knew the JFK story didn't add up.. Also attacked.
Attacking seems to work
Think of how times have changed.
This used to be allowed on YouTube.
(see attached)
They only erased it after it was up for 10 years."Hate" doncha know.
Took a while for them to think that up.
Back at the day previous they would just take it all down, no excuse needed.
(Wow. This could be part of the DJT POTUS lawsuit.?)
No one watched it past 06 I think.
So it as up on YouTube but shadowbanned to some backwater no one visited
The man who made it, an Australian, had a nervous breakdown, I believe.
He was targeted.. Social engineering on him.
He was funny, though and smart.
One of the smartest and best video makers.
because that was the consensus viewpoint - that it was as presented, and we were attacked.
This sentence wasn't clear. sooory
We (USA) were attacked,, the Trade Tower.
We, the researchers, were attacked.
That's how our material is suppressed;
The best way the Cabal found.
Think how everyone fell in line to tease and bully DJTrump POTUS
How much easier is it to make fools of "Tin foil hat" people?
They figured that out ,or at least began to formally implement that strategy, in '67, around the JFK murder . The amateur investigators needed to be discredited