https://twitter.com/conspiracyb0t/status/1430734435226427396
top kek, so true, so true
>So then who are the dipshyts injecting bleach now?
They are injecting Chlorine Dioxide.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/covid-peru-cure-investigation-bleach-b1848037.html
Covid: Peru to officially investigate if bleach can cure coronavirus
South American country will take evidence on if drinking or injecting chlorine dioxide can help in battle with global pandemic
...
But in a move echoing Donald Trump's infamous suggestion that scientists should explore the idea of injecting bleach, Peruvian congress member Posemoscrowte Chagua introduced a congress motion on Thursday asking health ministers to take evidence on the subject.
Chagua, who is a doctor, dismissed concerns that chlorine dioxide is toxic and instead suggested it could prove to be a vital tool in the battle with coronavirus, reported Vice.
Lawmakers voted 49 to 39 in favour of his proposal.
The vote came as Peru continues to be devastated by the pandemic.
The country has the highest reported per capita death rates in the world and, while fatality numbers are now slowing slightly, April saw record numbers of people killed by the virus.
...
Spoiler: IT WORKS
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-suggests-injection-disinfectant-beat-coronavirus-clean-lungs-n1191216
April 2020: Trump suggests 'injection' of disinfectant to beat coronavirus and 'clean' the lungs
President Donald Trump suggested the possibility of an "injection" of disinfectant into a person infected with the coronavirus as a deterrent to the virus during his daily briefing Thursday.
Trump made the remark after Bill Bryan, who leads the Department of Homeland Security's science and technology division, gave a presentation on research his team has conducted that shows that the virus doesn't live as long in warmer and more humid temperatures. Bryan said, "The virus dies quickest in sunlight," leaving Trump to wonder whether you could bring the light "inside the body."
"So supposing we hit the body with a tremendous — whether it's ultraviolet or just a very powerful light — and I think you said that hasn't been checked because of the testing," Trump said, speaking to Bryan during the briefing. "And then I said, supposing you brought the light inside the body, which you can do either through the skin or some other way, and I think you said you're going to test that, too."
He added: "I see the disinfectant that knocks it out in a minute, one minute. And is there a way we can do something like that by injection inside or almost a cleaning? As you see, it gets in the lungs, it does a tremendous number on the lungs, so it would be interesting to check that."
He didn't specify the kind of disinfectant.
https://www.hilarispublisher.com/open-access/determination-of-the-effectiveness-of-chlorine-dioxide-in-the-treatment-of-covid-19.pdf
Determination of the Effectiveness of Chlorine Dioxide in the Treatment of COVID 19
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of this review is to determine the Effectiveness of Oral Chlorine Dioxide in the Treatment of COVID-19.
Methods: Research on the mechanism of action of chlorine dioxide on viruses, on the oral consumption of water-solubilized ClO2
and on its toxicity
was reviewed; a quasi-experimental investigation was conducted on the use of oral water-soluble chlorine dioxide in the treatment of 20 patients
with active COVID-19 infection, compared to a control group of 20 patients not treated with chlorine dioxide.
Results:
To compare the effect in the experimental group versus the control group, a paired test was performed using the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney
test (α: 95%). Within the experimental group, a significant difference was observed in all general symptoms when comparing day 0 to day 07.
Some even disappeared after day 7. Those values that did not disappear completely on day 7 did not differ from those on days 14 and 21 (p>0.05).
As for headache, it decreased very significantly (p<0.0001) from day 0 with respect to subsequent days. When comparing the experimental group
with the control group on the seventh day post manifestation of symptoms, a significant difference was found in the experimental group with
respect to the control group for the symptoms Fever (p: 0000), Cough (p: 0.0001), Chills (p: 0.0015) and Dyspnea (p: 0.0047). When performing
the visual analogous comparison of pain in the control group and in the experimental group, it was found that in all the items that make up the
scale decreased significantly in this group with respect to the Control group. On day 14 post manifestation the difference was greater (p<0.001).
When evaluating both groups (Control and Experimental) in the laboratories, a difference was found for the values for the parameters PC Reactive
(p: 0.0398) and DH Lactate (0.0422), with higher scores for the experimental group; no difference was found in the rest of the parameters. The
results in general (p<0.05) demonstrate the hypothesis that chlorine dioxide is effective in the treatment of COVID-19. It was found that in all the
items that make up the scale decreased significantly in this group with respect to the Control group. On day 14 post manifestation the difference
was greater (p<0.001).
Discussion:
When evaluating both groups (Control and Experimental) in the laboratories, a difference was found for the values for the parameters
PC Reactive (p: 0.0398) and DH Lactate (0.0422), with higher scores for the experimental group; no difference was found in the rest of the
parameters. The results in general (p<0.05) demonstrate the hypothesis that chlorine dioxide is effective in the treatment of COVID-19. It was found
that in all the items that make up the scale decreased significantly in this group with respect to the Control group. On day 14 post manifestation
the difference was greater (p<0.001). When evaluating both groups (Control and Experimental) in the laboratories, a difference was found for the
values for the parameters PC Reactive (p: 0.0398) and DH Lactate (0.0422), with higher scores for the experimental group; no difference was
found in the rest of the parameters. The results in general (p<0.05) demonstrate the hypothesis that chlorine dioxide is effective in the treatment
of COVID-19. a difference was found for the values for the parameters PC Reactive (p: 0.0398) and DH Lactate (0.0422), with higher scores for
the experimental group; no difference was found in the rest of the parameters. The results in general (p<0.05) demonstrate the hypothesis that
chlorine dioxide is effective in the treatment of COVID-19. A difference was found for the values for the parameters PC Reactive (p: 0.0398) and
DH Lactate (0.0422), with higher scores for the experimental group; no difference was found in the rest of the parameters. The results in general
(p<0.05) demonstrate the hypothesis that chlorine dioxide is effective in the treatment of COVID-19.
Conclusion:
Chlorine dioxide is effective in the treatment of COVID-19and the mechanisms of action by which it acts to achieve it are proposed in this work. We recommend doing more research. We recommend conducting double-blind studies and delving into studies of toxicological safety
and therapeutic efficacy of chlorine dioxide in pathologies of epidemiological impact in the near future.
Nothing can stop what is coming.
Nothing.