Anonymous ID: c68fe6 July 15, 2019, 11:43 a.m. No.9037   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9040 >>9044 >>9059 >>9073 >>9098 >>9112 >>9123 >>9184 >>9186 >>9191 >>9241 >>9273 >>9284 >>9290 >>9357 >>9384 >>9401 >>9487 >>9557 >>9581 >>9585 >>9600 >>9700 >>9708 >>9743

Dual boards, and "Coincidence" Last Night? "Expand our thinking?

 

Strangest thing happened last night on the Qresearch board.

 

Was pondering the dual board chaos from the 40,000 ft view, for 4 days, cuz Q can surprise and suddenly take us in a different direction than what looks obvious to us anons. (Especially when he starts posting "be ready".)

 

As I collected dots on the events on both boards, a strange picture began to emerge. While still foggy on it, I started drawing pictures of what I thought I might be looking at, with "expand my thinking" attitude.

(see pic 1 related, I drew for my post)

 

The post itself was rambling TL;DR fuzzy description of random thoughts and questions about emerging possibilities, as I tried to make sense of what I was looking at. Did not expect and answer really.

 

TL:DR Hypothetical Was:

1) Mebbe Q is refusing the "either this or that" site as a false dichotomy pushed by shills, and

 

2) MEBBE Q is wanting us to think in terms of doing a military style build out on the original Qresearch site?

Qresearch and QRB were created on the same day. I remembered that migration, and the creation of the bunker as a second site.

WHY two sites?

Why was the bunker unlocked the night of the attack on Qresearch without fanfair, allowing anons to do a slow migration?

What were the plans?

Is QRB only a bunker?

 

3) Mebbe he plans to keep both sites?

 

4) Why does Q remain silent on the question of which site?

Is there another question he is waiting for us to ask that is not about which site he is posting to or about shills and BO?

 

Could it be we get stuck thinking about the military plans for (((them))) and fail to consider the possibility that the military would also have plans for anons too?

 

Then, surprise!

 

Got a surprise answer that seemed carefully placed right under Q's last post where anons would be most likely to see it. In fact it looked like anons might still be posting replies to Q when it happened. This can be checked now.

Was the placement coincidence?

(See pic 2 related)

 

Helper Anon?

Sure had a Q type Socratic method feel. So I brought it here for anons to look at last night. Thought I would share with day shift.

Found the reply extremely interesting and it's placement as well. So sharing with day shift anons for thoughts.

 

Do I think Q might choose boards?

Or do I think Q might be creating something we do not quite see yet?

Only time will tell. But, keeping my thinking expanded just the same. Qteam can take us into some pretty unexpected waters.

Anonymous ID: c68fe6 July 15, 2019, 11:54 a.m. No.9059   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9193 >>9290 >>9487 >>9708 >>9743

 

>>9037

>>9040

You are right. It is quite possible this is a shill pattern. What if the post below Q's post is a shill pretending to be a helper anon? I have no problem with your response. Skeptical is necessary right now.

But.

The question about the facts and coincidence >>9037

in front of us still remain. Lets keep an open mind, and connect more dots.

Things will move eventually. There may even be some things going on that I have missed entirely, that would tell us more about the picture.

Patience and observation anon. That is what I am doing. Being patient. Connecting the dots. You may well be correct. Let us see.

 

>>9037

>>9044

 

>712

 

>Truth to Power Marker

 

>Q

 

>!UW.yye1fxo

 

>10 Feb 2018 - 2:23:04 AM

 

>You will cease to exist.

 

>Truth to power.

 

>How’s the bunker these days?

 

>[14] live

 

>[Hello]

 

>[PEOC force failed]

 

>Q

 

Wow. I remember that. Another dot.

I had a question about it.

Got any ideas about what [PEOC force failed] means?

 

This dot would tend to lean toward the idea the Qresearch (or maybe some part of it) will cease to exist? Perhaps new management?

Lots of interesting questions.

Anonymous ID: c68fe6 July 15, 2019, 12:03 p.m. No.9077   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9302

>>9058

There are reasons for mild repetition.

I noticed in some instructions about notables somewhere past reading, that they are often posted once for day shift, and if anon thinks important, then again for night shift.

I observe this, and think it is helpful, since sometimes fast moving breads cause research to drop off, hit a dead end.

Not too bothered by it. No reason to be. Sometimes grateful for it.

Anonymous ID: c68fe6 July 15, 2019, 12:08 p.m. No.9094   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9104

>>9073

This anon. Truly. Decentralization seems to be helping a bit, and Clowns always identify a central location to attack. I have seen them organize central attacks even in the real world.

One example I can remember is the Tea Party movement? They were successful as a loose uncentralized group. They used something called "meetup.com" to meet real time at restaurants.

No leaders anywhere. Just organic plans made on saturdays at different restaurants.

 

This frustrated (((them))) so (((they))) sent in someone to "organize" the Tea Party nation wide.

 

Look what happened then?

Anonymous ID: c68fe6 July 15, 2019, 12:13 p.m. No.9112   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9121 >>9136 >>9140 >>9172 >>9249 >>9709

>>9037

Pretty much all replies making sense to me. Love this place. Feeling relaxed enough today so went to get proton mail, a paste bin account, and Notepad++.

Going to learn to bake here. Taking my time.

Question tho.

/Comms/

When we practice, are the instructions saying to use that Catalog to open new threads?

Want to be sure.

Thanks anons.