[1 of 4]

I am posting several large graphics that differ considerably in their design, so I am distributing them over several posts so I can explain them independently.

This graphic is the simplest, and it has a rather simple contention, namely that the "Q Op" is based upon the Radio Londres operation that prepared the French resistance for D-Day.

But the graphic actuallly goes further, and points to a number of comms that are grounded in that historical antecedent.

Much of the graphic is actually background information on Radio Londres and some other topics that appear in the decodes.

Some anons will know or recall some or all of this stuff, but I am aiming to ensure that this particular graphic requires as few presuppositions as possible.

Does my reasoning actually work?

Are the connections that I point to actually there?

Do they fit together in a coherent way?

Think about it logically: if some of the decodes appear too recherche, does this necessarily undermine the others?

Regarding wikipedia:

The biggest chunk of the stuff said there is true. It is the unsaid things that get you.

As to why Q's poem seems like a haiku, perhaps the next post offers a clue.

>>90037

[2 of 4]

This graphic presupposes that you have examined the prior one.

Moreover, this one is also more complex in its own right.

Whereas that one simply reinterpreted several Q posts in light of a certain historical context (Radio Londres and D-Day), this one reinterprets some Q drops by employing three rather different sources.

The first is Dan Scavino.

As anons know, anons now routinely examine Dan's posts for possible comms.

But it seems Dan has gradually been revealed as a key player in this whole shebang, and it might be worth looking at multiple posts of his in conjunction, to see if new meanings appear when they are put together.

As you will see, I think the answer is yes.

But I also try to ferret out some hidden comms in one of the movies that Q mentioned, and in one of the deceptively simple rah-rah vids POTUS posted.

So it might seem that I going in three wildly different directions, since the film and the video and the Dan posts don't seem to have anything to do with each other on the surface.

But that's how it goes, right?

Things that don't seem to be connected turn out to be, you know, connected.

Since I am mostly trying to get you to see the connections in a rather rational way, I have explained many things, just not as verbosely as in the prior graphic.

But there are a few cases where I just dropped different graphical elements next to each other to see if you can catch the link.

But you can completely miss those things and still grasp the "logical" flow of the whole graphic.

I should say that I omitted a whole bunch of "evidence" that I could have added.

I was trying to pack some rather disparate stuff into a graphic that meets the 8kun size standard and might be engaging for anons without being overwhelming.

So there were a number of "deleted scenes"... stuff relating to the highway, the date of the big fight, the film about that, the sportsmen, and who knows what.

But you can "get" the graphic without following any of those trails.

In my experience, things work best when you follow the angles that genuinely strike you.

>>90039

[3 of 4]

This graphic is still more complex conceptually than the prior, but I gave it a simpler design to compensate.

Simply read it as you would read text: left-to-right, top-to-bottom.

There are three "big" things I am doing here:

1) I am putting together a range of comms from various "connected players".

There is not a single "theme" as there was with Dan's football tweets... this combination simply turns out to be what works.

But as with Dan's tweets, this combo amplifies the meaning when combined.

2) I am pointing to several markers in some of the insider comms that point to two graphics I previously posted, one recently and one on 1/19/21.

3) Towards the bottom, I offer a rather "big picture" decode of some connected Q drops.

While this graphic does not depend logically on the prior two, the three get progressively more complex, so you might wish to go through them in order.

But this one has a much more conversational tone and it is slightly easier to keep track of where you are.

Think for yourself.

>>90041

[4 of 4]

The graphic at right is a repost of the graphic originally found here:

https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/12612999.html#12613566

That graphic omits connections and explanations, but most of it is not hard to figure out.

Regarding the two spots that are somewhat more challenging, you will find clues (if you need them), in my new graphics (last three posts).

You might also note that I stole a mistake from POTUS. 5:5?

The other large graphic partially seen in the prior post can be found here:

https://8kun.top/qrb/res/85104.html#85149

That post is a followup to a series of puzzles I have posted, but which have not yet gained much attention, it seems.

Follow the link there for more info.

And by all means, solve the open puzzle to see even more.

TY again to all who have contributed.

And hello George: https://t.me/georgenews/2068

I'll be back.

>>90037

3 graphics available here:

https://endchan.net/qrbunker/res/9395.html#9675

technical difficulties re others atm