Anonymous ID: 139d01 Jan. 8, 2018, 9:01 p.m. No.93   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1229

May I humbly suggest on this board we keep an open mind to the prospect of streamlining the usual bread we're used to? I will be willing and able to collaborate in a dedicated thread throughout the week. Goal would be to have something highly accessible and functional, trim the fat per se, that consensus approves of, in order to better facilitate research.

Anonymous ID: 139d01 Jan. 8, 2018, 9:25 p.m. No.449   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>226

I'm pretty hands-off and have zero experience but I've been posting in Q threads for 14 hours straight now. I have availability and what wisdom a 30yo lifelong cyborg can have. Generally interested in contributing in some way. Would be willing to try my hand at modding, as well.

Anonymous ID: 139d01 Jan. 8, 2018, 9:42 p.m. No.679   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Tips for being a good /qresearch/er

>Be courteous: generally try to be polite, as appropriate. We are researchers in a collaborative online workspace.

 

>Be quiet: when some anons are trying hard to piece together intel, it can be very distracting and exhausting if there is a lot of 'noise' in the thread from numerous other anons engaging in separate or casual conversation.

 

Maybe there should be two threads - two general threads, one with fun only the other with no fun allowed. Then again maybe not. I don't know.