Anonymous ID: 30b1ae July 19, 2020, 6:15 a.m. No.10008277   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8287

I've noticed something interesting. I have been an "anti-vaxxer" (medical freedom advocate) for a few years now. One thing that tripped me up initially is the argument that, even if a vaccine has risks for some people, it is still necessary to be vaccinated for the "greater good". When I dug in on this, however, the lie was revealed. If the vaccines work then why does it matter what anyone else does? If my vaccine has caused me to develop "protective antibodies" or whatever they try to tell me, then why does it matter if the baby next door doesn't get vaccinated?

 

What the left is trying to do (and trying to do again via mask ordinances) is to compel a form of "human sacrifice lite" via medical mandates. Here's how it works: Adults will often risk their lives to protect the vulnerable. We will risk our well-being willingly out of love and compassion. What the left wants to do is reverse this. First, the "sacrifice" (as in satanic ritual abuse) is forced on the unwilling or those too young to consent. Second, the sacrifice is for the protection of those who ought to be doing the protecting. Why is it okay to demand an infant receive toxic vaccine dosages to protect "the community"? The baby cannot consent and society, ostensibly ought to be ordered around protecting the next generation not sacrificing them. If you look at the current ordering of society it is BUILT upon demanding/compelling sacrifice from the unwilling for the benefit of the wicked ruling class.

 

I have natural rights/freedoms that are available to me from God through His Son, Jesus. As the Bible teaches, it was for freedom that Christ has made us free. The other side of this freedom is responsibility. I have authority and freedom regarding what I do about my own health, conversely if I get sick or suffer poor health the responsibility for that, in general, is mine, too. If someone attempts to overrule my personal authority via vaccine mandates or mask mandates, they have become, I believe, personally responsible for the harm they cause. If I voluntarily, without compulsion, submit, the consequences are my own.

Anonymous ID: 30b1ae July 19, 2020, 6:45 a.m. No.10008449   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10008180

 

That is good news. However, some folks will not want to deal with the unpleasantness of a "conversation" at the entrance or glares/comments from other customers. Better if Walmart had a "We the People" moment and didn't try to play "footsie" with DS totalitarian fascists. Of course, each of us must take personal responsibility regarding our conscience and how we choose to preserver our freedom/rights. That is why I am not shopping at Walmart. They have annoyed me for years, especially the pervasive surveillance.

Anonymous ID: 30b1ae July 19, 2020, 6:50 a.m. No.10008478   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8517 >>8534

Does anyone else think or have evidence that the Portland pick-ups of seemingly random people away from Federal buildings may have been a FF to give grounds for the current lawsuit? Impersonating or falsely accusing federal officers so the ACLU can sue?

 

If the pickups were by federal officers, I'm not sure that is wrong. What do you do when a city is lawless? It would almost be like being down in enemy territory. I don't think the Trump administration would pursue activities that go against the very law and order they are trying to protect. If someone has evidence to the contrary (other than Oregon AG claims) I hope they share it.

Anonymous ID: 30b1ae July 19, 2020, 7:01 a.m. No.10008522   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8533 >>8535 >>8559

I find the connection between slavery and mandated masks very interesting. This blog post sheds some interesting light on the subject. The punishment for the "scold" reminds me of the humiliation of needing to wear a mask in public. When the "scold" was punished part of the punishment was the humiliation of appearing in public with the "mask" or cage on the head.

 

https://usslave.blogspot.com/2011/09/slave-tortures-mask-scolds-bridle-or.html