Anonymous ID: 62f17c April 11, 2018, 1:37 p.m. No.1001203   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1215 >>1406 >>1431 >>1670

Anons read!

Just my 5 cents to Zuckerberg testimony:

All just show. Goal is to get rid off small companies sharing data, thus monopolizing Facebook. Do you really believe CIA would slaughter their best data donkey? You were fooled. This whole thing was just a show, a way to get people enraged but that's it. Nothing will happen. And I highly doubt now that Zuckerberg will step down as chairman, even if Q predicted that.

 

You all should read what they have decided on the WEF (World Economic Forum), a coalition of Internet companies to government. You all are idiots if you really supported or believed that Zuckerberg was 'grilled' there. Here is the WEF document: "The Known Traveller".

 

http:// www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_The_Known_Traveller_Digital_Identity_Concept.pdf

 

This is worse than we all have thought. Even George Orwell never came up with such an idea. All I can say to this: You will never again have the freedom of your privacy than you had now. Sure, what we had all this time now wasn't better either, but what's coming next is worse than the current situation. Who the fuck did support this?

Anonymous ID: 62f17c April 11, 2018, 1:43 p.m. No.1001244   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1416

>>1001215

I would like to hear a reason. Also, to go back to whom or what? Did you read what I wrote or did you just skim read the text without paying attention?

 

No surprise that most researchers here are not able to decode any of Q's message. Half of the board here is just meme'ing or spitting out bs that is not on topic.

 

Concentrate anons.

 

Read the document, and you'll get why Zuckerberg played along with this show which we mistakenly called a "testimony". Our worst fears are becoming real. We have to stop this. Seriously. It's your and my fucking privacy.