>>10013321 , >>10013779 Analysis: Watch for the #Flynn opposition to be filed tomorrow

I think I see what’s going on

Every lawyer and legal scholar was surprised that one circuit court judge ruled on Flynn’s dismissal, by he had one that totally went off the rails, stating almost weird language why he/she didn’t agree. Remember the day of deliberation all judges were asking insane and unrelated questions about Flynn’s case. When it finally came down to it, two out of the three were not compromised, but that one that was made a 2-1 judgement to dismiss. Everyone thought, this is a no brainer. That one judge opened the door to En Banc review. So my speculation is:

1. They were all in on it and wanted it to to En Banc extending the timeline of the completion of Flynn’s freedom or

2. The other judges played along with The dissenting judge to see who would compromise themselves to allow Sullivan to get an En Banc hearing

3. The whole goal was to have a divided court in En Banc so it would get to the Supreme Court

4. Why the SC, well it been obvious Roberts have recently ruled I’m the side of liberals I’m the most destructive cases that have nothing to do with the language of the constitution

5. And finally, but a big stretch: if the SC is divided or rule not based upon constitutional it law, then maybe “The Relevance of The Constitution Should Be Revisited“

Anyway you look at if, it’s a delay tactic, but it could be a lot more than that!

>>10013321 , >>10013779 Analysis: Watch for the #Flynn opposition to be filed tomorrow

Reposting due to spelling and grammatical errors

I think I see what’s going on

Every lawyer and legal scholar was surprised that one circuit court judge ruled on Flynn’s dismissal, by he had one that totally went off the rails, stating almost weird language why he/she didn’t agree. Remember the day of deliberation all judges were asking insane and unrelated questions about Flynn’s case.

When it finally came down to it, two out of the three were not compromised, but that one that made a 2-1 judgement to dismiss.

Everyone thought, this is a no brainer. That one judge opened the door to En Banc review. So my speculation is:

1. They were all in on it and wanted it to to En Banc extending the timeline of the completion of Flynn’s freedom or

1. The other judges played along with The dissenting judge to see who would compromise themselves to allow Sullivan to get an En Banc hearing

1. The whole goal was to have a divided court in En Banc so it would get to the Supreme Court

1. Why the SC, well it been obvious Roberts have recently ruled I’m the side of liberals I’m the most destructive cases that have nothing to do with the language of the constitution

1. And finally, but a big stretch: if the SC is divided or rule not based upon constitutional it law, then maybeThe Relevance of The Constitution Should Be Revisited

Anyway you look at if, it’s a delay tactic, but it could be a lot more than that!

>>10014247 DOD twat on navy ship in Persian Gulf

OK guise I’m going to tell you what I saw when I enlarged the picture, please tell me what you saw

I saw the baby Jesus in the manger with shining light all around him, and he’s holding up both of his hands with his middle finger raised in the BIG FU message for others to see. Yep that’s what I saw, deal with it!

>>10014427 Lori Lightfoot really wants that title of “America’s Worst Mayor”

She tried out for “The Walking Dead” but she looked to realistic, so they didn’t hire her, because they really didn’t want to hire a real life corpse