….ONE DROP AT A TIME.
>>1001676 (near end of prior bread)
The idea of Snowden being told by Q in a drop that he was "now a liability"…most of us read it as SNOWDEN BEING HUNTED DOWN….in essence, he was now a LIABILITY for the bad actors.
What if….we read it backwards….
FOLLOW ME:
(REMEMBER, PUNCTUATION IS IMPORTANT!)
Take a look at the ACTUAL Q POST (See pic). Look very closely at the location of the PERIODS.
NAME. (period)
NAME. (period)
NAME. (period)
Now….here's is the way I read it:
A name BEFORE EACH PERIOD
In the last case, NAME WASN'T MENTIONED BEFORE THE PERIOD directly preceding @Snowden!
In other words, Q is talking to SOMEONE (NO NAME) and telling them "we have @Snowden working on getting the goods" (in a nutshell)…and now THAT PERSON (who hasn't been named BEFORE THE PERIOD) is a liability!!!!
GUESS WHAT Q'S NEXT POST WAS??
Our literal "NONAME" in a MEETING WITH HIS BUDDIES IN SYRIA!!!!