blocks your path
thx anon.
just a casual observation (not tested), but if you change the lightest color in the 4-color to 'dark red' - adding more to 2nd darkest shade, the resulting 3-color resembles the first one (5x24), right?
change every white square in the 4-color to the 2nd darkest shade. there should not be any white squares left.
this is what i was thinking..
>See >>10019813 (You)
that was my post kek
this is something. the 4-color is the same as the first 3-color after that color reassignment.
I also liked the 'WarGames' movie angle.
WOPR
(pb)
#12539
>>9796998 (WarGames 1983 — WOPR)
Description
War Operation Plan Response (WOPR)
NORAD supercomputer known as WOPR, programmed to continuously run war simulations and learn over time
…WOPR stages a massive Soviet first strike with hundreds of missiles, submarines, and bombers. Believing the attack to be genuine, NORAD prepares to retaliate.
…Falken and David direct the computer to play tic-tac-toe against itself. This results in a long string of draws, forcing the computer to learn the concept of futility and no-win scenarios.
…Having discovered the concept of mutual assured destruction ("WINNER: NONE"), the computer tells Falken that it has concluded that nuclear war is "a strange game" in which "the only winning move is not to play." WOPR relinquishes control of NORAD and the missiles and offers to play "a nice game of chess."
movie clips:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_aUHQKneAdw WarGames — WOPR
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRsycWRQrc8 WarGames clip - WOPR described
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCWKZWieMSY Wargames 1983 - The voice of WOPR
online WOPR simulator:
http://dataplusscience.com/WOPR/wargames.html
I did not.
I think the first image was posted by Flynn to parler (requires login).
The others were posted by Flynn family I think, at least one on twitter.