Compromising for survival is understandable, don’t know what to tell ya.
At some point however, a stand will have to be made because these ‘compromises’ are actually risking our very survival, ironically.
Compromising for survival is understandable, don’t know what to tell ya.
At some point however, a stand will have to be made because these ‘compromises’ are actually risking our very survival, ironically.
At some point, if the business owners won’t make a stand, they too deserve to be out of business.
Should We the People make it through this, there will be plenty of pieces to pick up and start over.
I resent Q and POTUS a tad, for not speaking in a straight forward and truthful manner.
A most un-perfect pour
Question to lawfags (not expecting a useful answer):
When am I legally justified defending my life from someone who would have me dead, by non-lethally punching them in the face?
Whether by bumbling-oopsy-negligence, or nefarious intent… slowly strangling the life out of me, my family, neighbors and friends is deadly.
I’m at least giving Them the benefit of doubt that They are doing it without knowledge and intention. A pop in the nose seems more than fair. It must at some point be “OK”.
Btw, why isn’t negligent mass murder “suspect”?
Good God and Christ Almighty…
Please tell me you’ve sent that many words to the fools ready to defund police, burn history, and skull fuck and eat your children.
Just to be clear, I ask about popping someone in the nose…
You make it sound like I need to sit back and let them do whatever the fuck, so long as I never express a subtle willingness to dissuade them.