>>10032055

IMHO: Clickbait

1. The only source besides Twatter and Fakebook is a sight I have to give my email to to view?

2. The try hard red text is over the top. Just the facts Man!

Not trying to discredit, but this could be notable. If you could take the above criticism and improve the post it may well be.

I've had to alter my digs two or three times before it became notable. Keep trying in earnest and you might produce something worthy.

>>10032213

I see your point and was sincerely trying to help.

I would ask you to be more reflective but your combative, reactionary response indicates to me that even this post will probably do more harm than good. This is often the case, not sure why I continue to try.

Suffice to say, I will not be responding further.

I will leave it with the ubiquitous, low energy, but true statement I should have left it with from the start:

Lurk Moar