Anonymous ID: 56be84 July 21, 2020, 8:34 p.m. No.10040255   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0272

>>10040062

>Like it gives me this energy I've lost.

I had this fleeting moment of fear that shit's finally ready to go south, but then I just laughed. Cathartic almost. I had another thought too…could all of Q's Twitter love lately be his showing of solidarity with that side of things while they were still able to? In order to buoy them for their eventual de-platforming? Make them feel more a part of this because many don't come here directly? Anons don't need that kind of support, we've already been through it. We're plenty used to exodus by now…even if Twatterfags get banned, they still always go back to the same site in the end. The show began and ends with us (or some variation of – Odin maybe?).

Anonymous ID: 56be84 July 21, 2020, 8:49 p.m. No.10040412   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0494

>>10040135

>>10040138

Agree, but images can't trend on their own and you might have to bombard lib account replies as much as anything else to get seen. You risked getting honeypotted into a ban. I think we have to use hashtags that are already trending WITH the memes. You know, all the cryptic normie crap that has only like 1000 tweets but is allowed to trend anyway. Then people can stumble upon Q stuff more organically. Like how many normies click celebrity trends just because they think the person died? Then tweet, "OMG, I saw Chrissy Assface trending and am so relieved she didn't die!" It's a self-perpetuating trend because normies are suckers for what they think is popular.

>>10040272

o7

Anonymous ID: 56be84 July 21, 2020, 9:16 p.m. No.10040677   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10040494

Plenty put in work…is it seen by and effective at convincing new people, is the question. We can always find new ways of improving. And we have. And we will. Sometimes you have to think like a normie to affect a normie, is all. Meanwhile, we need some metric to know if this shit is working kek. Can't assume anything.