>>1004000

Been considering the Snowden issue much more of late. Since the very start I have been convinced he was a traitor and his actions harmed the nation. They did, no doubt about that. At the same time though I have been considering who he really harmed and when this issue came into play and the actual target (per say) were the mechanisms put into play by Clinton, Bush and Obama. All of which we know are DS connected and all of which had tenures which pushed an even bigger devolution of Constitutional fundamental rights.

So I ask myself if my initial thought on him is correct or if he was openly attacking the very same thing we are in an, albeit, incorrect way but the only way he felt he could. Now if he has any connection to a foreign government than I want him hunted down and ended. However, if this was a strike against the DS than I just don't know how to feel. My patriotism directs me to want his ass done for but, at the same time, if he was openly attacking the very group that has brought all these issues to the globe than that changes things. I don't know… need more facts.

>>1004216

Yep. You assure someone publicly makes position clear in a public manner and then you come back and counter it with evidence. From there, they are done.

>>1004229

For this to occur though you also need to assure the right questions are asked to lock down the response from them. Cruz and Sasse asked questions that I personally believe are connected to that very thing.

>>1004241

I am not Snowden and I linked it awhile back. So that certainly can't be the case.

>>1004272

Thanks for the service old man.

>>1004314

The biggest concern I have with FB, and of course it was never questioned by our illustrious failures during the hearing, is how much information is provided to China and other foreign entities.

The potential for trafficking, hits, tracking and blackmail in general are immense and given that FB has a team of 20,000 people who are unvetted by the appropriate agencies there stands a monumental chance that information can be sold from within and FB brass not even being aware.

>>1004317

Pretty normal daily practice sorties by a base. If Nellis, Hill and Luke become active then we know something is up.

>>1004321

>>1004353

Consider this. When did all those SV groups first begin to come into power and who was the POTUS at the time? Further, what did that POTUS do in terms of pushing Marxism? Further still, since the inception of those SV groups what have we seen become widespead and what was the would be epicenter of where the information was being spread?

Now you see who truly spread it and why it spread so rapidly.

>>1004397

Have never considered it/wouldn't know where to begin to be honest but, yeah, definitely an option that should have been looked at already.

>>1004568

Seriously this is the type of shit that makes the channel look stupid. Think logically. You really think Snowden has access to the POTUS? Christ…

>>1004577

True. Better stated, the informational services/connection services in SV.

>>1004633

This fucking retard back again with this narrative. Yeah, yeah, we get it… bad stuff and shit.

>>1004677

I collect and assure I keep records of everything I do online so yes.

>>1004732

Hah seriously? That's a first being accused of that shit. No anon, just a fellow autist who is very good when it comes to research, investigation and cross referencing things with an eye for detail and a high level of due diligence. I would rather kill myself than betray my country. Death before dishonor.

>>1004813

In truth I posted that connection last week so am rather surprised it is picking up steam today instead of then when I thought it was the best thing since fried chicken in Africa but, regardless, glad it's out there as that is what matters as it seems it is taking off now and that/the defense of the country is all that matters.