1 of 3
==Exelon CEO needs to be held accountable in ComEd scandal
The corruption took place not merely on Crane's watch but under his nose.==
Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan isn't the only boss who should step down if allegations laid out in a deferred prosecution agreement between U.S. Attorney John Lausch and Commonwealth Edison are true.
Exelon CEO Chris Crane also deserves to lose his job for presiding over corruption on a breathtaking scale during eight years atop the parent company of Commonwealth Edison. The facts set forth in the deferred prosecution agreement and criminal information unveiled on Friday describe a multiyear bribery campaign by top ComEd officials seeking state legislation essential to Exelon's business strategy.
For example, the agreement alleges an executive described as "CEO-1"—clearly former ComEd CEO Anne Pramaggiore, who stepped down abruptly last fall from her new post as head of all Exelon utilities when the federal investigation of ComEd's Springfield activities came to light—orchestrated the hiring of Madigan pals as lobbyists and lawyers, even getting one appointed to the ComEd board.
This was no penny-ante kickback scheme by low-level purchasing agents. The allegations–which ComEd doesn't dispute—outline a continuous campaign of corruption carried out by senior executives, including one of Crane's direct reports.
In short, the corruption took place not merely on Crane's watch but under his nose. Like so many CEOs in similar situations, Crane is left with little choice but to plead ignorance. Perhaps he managed to keep his eyes and ears closed tightly enough to avoid learning the true nature of his subordinates' relationship with Madigan, who held the keys to top business priorities such as a state bailout of Exelon nukes.
If so, it's a reason to fire him. A CEO so uninformed about such egregious misconduct by senior executives relating to matters of such importance to the company clearly isn't up to the job.
An Exelon spokesman excuses Crane because "the conduct at issue in the agreement with the U.S. Attorney relates only to ComEd and does not contain any allegation of misconduct by Exelon."
Sorry, but the corporate veil separating Exelon and ComEd is little more than a legal fiction that shouldn't shield Crane from accountability for wrongdoing at the Chicago-based utility. Even Exelon's website acknowledges that his responsibilities go beyond the holding company, noting that "Crane oversees a family of companies," including ComEd.