>>10047751

I wonder if Twitter will ban an account that has nothing Q-related on it that Q might happen to link to in a future post. Or someone who is anti-Q and 'on their side.'

If Q mass-tags a bunch of blue-checks in a series of posts will Twitter end up being a team-killing fucktard and open fire anyway?

>>10047743

Nothing to see here, just the Canadian government openly promoting and advocating for sexual depravity.

>>10048471

As am I and have pics