Anonymous ID: 79190c April 11, 2018, 6:21 p.m. No.1004860   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4875 >>4876 >>4879 >>4881 >>4902 >>4915 >>4921 >>4942 >>4956 >>4970 >>4974 >>4987 >>4997 >>5095 >>5097 >>5202 >>5250 >>5350 >>5373 >>5401

anon posts 2 images and message

>>1003248

Check the dates. Pentagon kills LIFELONG project same day Facebook is formed.

 

15 minutes later:

>>1003248

Finder of this should apply to NSA.

Q

Does anyone see a problem here?

If Q did not know about this then that is a big problem - no doubt there

If Q did know why would he not post it - or at least a clue sooner? It could have been posted outright as it was open source - not national security issue. Ok maybe we are supposed to find thinks ourselves - fine - but has Q dropped any clues on this issue? Not that I can remember.

Anons have been discussing for some time the shady origins of Facebook - plus its all over the web. Why wouldn't Q just link to it for us to dig on? Or even just post a clue to dig there? Q's credibility is the biggest redpill we have to get over - there are many who have doubts - why not give us a good talking point to slam facebook and the clowns? This does not smell right.

PS - I trust THE PLAN 100% because I trust POTUS 100% - I 100% believe Q is who he says he is but I cannot trust Q's method or character - something very off.

 

wtf are anons thinking snowden was needed to drop an article from wired magazine?

Q could have dropped that any time

Q didnt have it.

Anonymous ID: 79190c April 11, 2018, 6:46 p.m. No.1005468   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

โ€œDrop after testimony.โ€

R U learning yet?

Q

 

the article from wired was the drop?

weak very weak

its very good info but open source

not impressive at all