>>10051504 (filtered)
>>10051513 (filtered)
>>10051528 (filtered)
>>10051532 (thank you, baker. You're cool.)
>>10051540 (and thank you, too, baker. You're cool, also.)
…Agreed. Watched that film countless times and it's aged well. Be well.
…Agreed. Falls in line with the hypothesis of Venus having a two aspects; The one of abject beauty and the other, her wrathful, destructive form. The shit a person learns by lurking and doing some background research is the kind of stuff that can't be 'unseen' and surreal.
…The once known 'stationary sun'; A brown dwarf star, now a 'gas giant'. The myth of it as the devourer of it's own 'children' (flashback to the purple dawn of creation and the hypothesis that the Earth was once a satellite of Saturn.) This only gets more complex (and more gaslit), the further a person researches. This puzzle has been a great challenge, for this anon.
…Planetary bodies radiating their own EM frequencies, like the sun. If the sun still has an influence (solar flares and it's disruption upon the biological 'compass', whales beaching themselves or birds becoming lost, as examples), why couldn't the planets have the same effect?
…^This. Thank you for clarifying. I have trouble fully explaining the complex topic. Not the wordy type. I've posted too much. Back to lurkin'.