Q tried to tell you Mueller wasn't DS. You didn't listen.
It has already happened over a year ago. This place got overtaken by facebook normies who have no real functional difference from the liberals they claim to hate so much. They came here, not knowing how to think for themselves, and took information that the researchers were gathering. The problem is, these people committed mental plagiarism; they believe that simply by knowing this information that they are "intelligent free thinkers". The sad fact is that these people simply believe whatever they want to. They can't actually back up any of their claims with evidence because they have never seen any, they just believe whatever people say that they happen to like.
Mueller never could have been Deep State. The possibility was exactly 0 given what he found. How is it possible that a member of the DS would say that there was no evidence that Trump colluded with Russia? So you believe that the same group of people who paid for foreign disinformation, lied under penalty of perjury that it was verified multiple times, changed communications from the IC, and submitted all of this to the court multiple times isn't going to lie once more and say that Trump was guilty? Are you serious?
As if this extraordinarily simple logic wasn't enough, Q flat out tells you the truth in posts 3 and 18. He starts post 3 with OPEN YOUR EYES, he's trying to tell you that the right wing MSM is still, in fact, the MSM. "It finally came out that Rod/Bob were key players in the Uranium scandal. Don't you think POTUS would be tweeting about removal given clear conflict." POTUS didn't tweet about the removal because there was no conflict because this literally never happened. The right wing MSM gave you a piece of truth, that Mueller took 2 grams of Uranium to Russia. What they didn't tell you is that those 2 grams were confiscated from terrorists and he was going to the manufacturing plant in order for both the US and Russian government to verify that this operation's supply chain was compromised by terrorists. "Not everyone is corrupt (fewer than you think)."
Post 18: "Why did Mueller meet POTUS 1-day prior to FBI announcement if Mueller COULD NOT be offered director due to prev term limits rule? Why is Pelosi begging for a new special counsel?" WHY IS PELOSI BEGGING FOR A NEW SPECIAL COUNSEL? The memory hole is deep. It's because Mueller isn't (((their guy))).
Mueller even basically straight up tells everyone that POTUS was the one who wanted him as the special counsel in this section of a hearing: https://youtu.be/qp5jiwSSnrQ?t=234. Executive privilege means that anything you discuss with POTUS cannot be discussed elsewhere unless specifically authorized. Notice Mueller definitively answers every question about the meeting with POTUS except for "did you discuss any time in that meeting the appointment of a special counsel" Mueller says "I can't get into that". The reason he answered every question except for this one is because POTUS authorized him to talk about anything they discussed EXCEPT the appointment of the special counsel.
The vast majority of you are pretenders. You don't research, you are parasites who have driven many of the actual researchers away with your ignorance, stupidity, and hubris. You don't read documents, you obviously haven't read any IG reports (because if you had you'd also know it was McCabe who was running everything you think Comey was and it's literally in black and white), you haven't even taken the time to go back and re-read Q's posts, or you simply don't have the capacity to understand them.
I personally can't wait for the ad hominem and complete lack of counter argument using documents or any semblance of logic because, as I said before, there is no real functional difference between these people and liberals. They just happen to be on the "right side" due to nothing more than a coin flip and until they realize this, they will never be able to change.