Anonymous ID: 4061f9 April 11, 2018, 6:56 p.m. No.1005641   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5688 >>5761

Drop after testimony.”

R U learning yet?

Q

the article from wired was the drop?

weak very weak

its very good info but open source

not impressive at all - why would snowden need to drop a WIRED article on an anon board? Q could have done that - he didnt need snowden and no one can prove it was snowden so why bother?

these crumbs dont seem very fresh - is Q stillprivy to all THE PLAN intel? or is he in the POTUS doghouse?

Anonymous ID: 4061f9 April 11, 2018, 7:08 p.m. No.1005886   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5929 >>6066

>>1005761

posting a WIRED article would not be legal?

but snowden dropped it? open source?

its not a DROP - it is just a link

hive mind? not buying it

if Q needs to remind us 3 times that the House is corrupt im not seeing anything that is a DROP of intel

Anonymous ID: 4061f9 April 11, 2018, 7:16 p.m. No.1006048   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6086

>>1005929

that was different

if we assume that Q wanted multiple calls to the FBI fine that is barely plausible

but snowden is the most wanted man on earth and why would he post a WIRED article on this board?

some secret signal to Q?

im not buying it