primo, ty
There is a lot he didn't know.
Egypt did not have slaves until the Hyksos arrived. Their capital was Avaris, where we get the word "avarice." Akhenaten was Hyksos and Tut was his son by (with) his sister, not Nephetiti, which is why he was deformed (inbred). They were fanatical monotheists and hated, finally driven out to the coast of the Levant.
Yes.
>aegypt was always slavery
No. Re_read the OP. Read more.
>Akhenaten was only hated by the pagan priests
No. The People despised him. For good reason. The importation of slavery ruined the regular economy, just as it was meant to do.
The destruction of their religion upset and rent the social fabric, just as it was meant to do.
A confused, destabilized and moorless, drifting public is much easier to control.
>Akhenaten was the JFK of back then….wanted to destroy the old world and free people
No. They enslave. They debase. They degrade. They destroy.
They are doing many of the same things today, for the same reasons.
Some have noted how similar Hussein looks to Akhenaten…
It's quite odd for someone on here to cheer on their team.
THIS GUY GETS IT
I never ascribe to malice what is explained by us being lied to about all our history and so much else. :)
There are so many lies to undo (unlearn) and truths to learn. They are rat bastards and we have to help each other.
Look into the Hyksos, their history, background, beliefs and practices. When you do, with an open mind, and consider different groups of people today, it will be familiar.
That would be some epic turnabout, and definitely 'fair play'!