I don't care what university they are affiliated with, tell me how these people are qualified to be called "experts." Years of independent research, peer reviewed and published? Research actually related to virus transmission and mutation in humans? Show me
Be Gone Leafy! Breadshitter
I hit up metacrawler, sputnik story for today looks like the one about Israeli helos firing into Syria from a Reuters story from April 30th
How do any of your posts really relate to a Q drop or an ongoing dig? Biblical Caananites? A wikipedia collection that happens to be called "Q-source?"
I dub thee bread gobbler
Post in the UK bread last night had somebody claiming to be part of Q, that we'd been "bamboozled" etc. Sure I'd seen it last year. I believe that twat should be a warning to expect more intensive demoralization efforts. Possible indicating a realization on the enemy's part that the playbook they've overused has not the results they wanted.
So that aids in any current digs how? I discovered last night I should start keeping an eye on Liverpool, Bristol, and possibly Hartlepool. These on top of the ports I already watch. I am working in the present and much more recent past. I can do nothing about centuries ago but I am determined to help take down the traffickers of now. You I see as distraction and waste of posts.
That's the same shill team that has been trying to keep presenting POTUS as a good friend of Epstein. Been at it for months now. The closer ties between Epstein and Clinton get via Chandler the more of that type of post you will see. Part of the playbook. Keep trying the same thing hoping for a different result. In this case try to make POTUS look bad, distract from digs, and discourage newfags. Goes along with attacking bakers and "the absolute state of these boards. Real anons left a long time ago…" The idea is to distract from digs and discourage new eyes. Twitter created a Streisand Effect by mass banning and announcing it, so curious people will find their way here. Strategy is to turn them off quickly before they get interested in the digs.
Honestly trying to multi-task yet keep up anons. I may have got the playbook figured out. What did I miss?
Playbook
Section One: Q is a LARP. Q is garbage. Nothing to see. Fringe conspiracy nuts. No connection to reality.
Section Two: Q has nothing on the scoreboard. No arrests. "I've lost faith" "show me results or I'm not voting" "Been here since the beginning,nothing ever happens, Always 'soon' but that's all"
Section Three: Anons are mostly bots. Anons are C_A clowns. Anons are Mossad. Anons are IRGC. Anons are CCP.
Section Four: Substitute Bakers for Anons in Section Three, add in "baker's union"
Section Five: Fill boards with larping shills. Austin Steinbart is Q. Hollywood insiders. Federal agent insiders. MSM insiders. Washington politician insiders.
Section Six: Fill the boards with anti-jewish, anti-black, anti-muslim, anti-asian. Attempt to make the boards look racist and divisive.
Section Seven: Keep asking questions pretending to be a newfag. "Who is Q+" "What does the killbox mean" "How do I red text" Here the idea is to get anons to turn on newfags thinking it's shills playing stupid again.
Section Eight: Slide the breads with either completely irrelevent posts, posts from discounted sources like Sorcha Faal, or things like JFK Jr.
Section Nine: Hammer directly on anons and/or bakers to try to cause emotional responses. Discouragement, frustration, etc. Use copious profanity and keep pouring it on, usually no more than three seperate anons on a single bread. Try to drive anons away, frustrate bakers to stop baking, and discourage anons from becoming bakers.