Big Tech censorship is elites vs. you

Matt Whitaker

With all of the attention surrounding election integrity, few pundits seem to notice or care that Silicon Valley tampers with our elections just as much as, if not more than, a hostile foreign government ever could.

Everyone from little-known Iowa songwriter Ryan Moore to the President of the United States himself is now subject to censorship by the Big Tech giants, who are abandoning the pretense of objectivity as they ramp up their crackdown on conservative content.

At this point, the reality of the censorship is not in serious dispute. As early as the beginning of 2019, there were rigorous quantitative analyses proving that Trump supporters are kept on a tight leash — apparently so tight that a low-profile songwriter like Moore can wind up in hot water simply for making a video while wearing a Make America Great Again hat. Meanwhile, leftists openly use every major social media platform to spread the most vile and violent messages with virtual impunity.

Their motivation is clear: The social media companies want to destroy the relatively open internet of 2015 and 2016 that enabled the MAGA movement to grow like wildfire and ensure that nothing like it ever happens again.The past four years have been one steadily turning ratchet of new rules and tools for censoring and silencing disfavored voices. Left-leaning journalists write hit pieces and bring pressure campaigns until their pro-Trump competitors are banned from the public sphere, then applaud Big Tech for “finally doing something.”

Social media today is almost unrecognizable from the environment that gave rise to the Trump movement. Many of the Facebook meme groups, snarky Twitter accounts, and right-wing YouTube channels that fueled the MAGA revolution are long gone. Those that remain, along with national commentators who rely on their social media accounts to make a living — as well as millions of ordinary citizens like Ryan Moore — know they walk on thin ice every time they post an opinion, no matter how innocuous they might think it is at the time.

As we speed through the final months before Election Day, Silicon Valley’s clear intention to sway the election to Joe Biden has become undeniable. Confident that they will face no consequences for their actions under a potential Biden administration, the tech giants have stopped hiding their desire to tilt this election in the Democrat’s favor.

Just last month, Twitter blocked tweets by the President of the United States — twice — for “glorifying violence,” simply because he insisted violent rioters and looters be met with the force of law and order. In addition, Amazon’s Twitch platform banned the official Trump Campaign channel for “hateful conduct,” Facebook banned official Trump Campaign ads, Google threatened to cut off the vital ad revenue of pro-Trump outlets The Federalist and Zerohedge, YouTube banned dozens of influential Trump-supporting accounts, and Reddit outright destroyed “r_thedonald,” the biggest pro-Trump discussion forum on the internet.

It’s difficult to view this as anything other than an effort on the part of Silicon Valley to help Joe Biden stumble his way into the White House. The fiction that these actions are somehow part of neutral “anti-hate” efforts has now been exposed by the censors themselves.

These are the same people who insisted that Russians buying Facebook ads was a grave threat to our democracy in 2016, yet they see nothing wrong with using Big Tech’s unprecedented power over public discourse to silence a huge swath of American public opinion. America was designed to foster a vibrant marketplace of ideas. Big Tech moderating that marketplace is unacceptable and dangerous. Our republic demands more and diverse voices not less.

That’s real election interference, and it is a grave threat to our democracy.

https://amp.desmoinesregister.com/amp/5391749002?__twitter_impression=true

>>10072309 Amazon ALEXA and New Reminders Function

This article should be titled,How to destroy humankind with Alexa Live Assistant

These are my thoughts, —anons please chime in. It’s times to pull up from archives the discussions with the AI not with an anon over a number of days, the apply mightily__

ok some thoughts about this two paragraph article

__First the article is not telling us the whole story, look at the 1st sentence under the title, the insinuation it’s damn creepy. Two, reminders like did you lock the door, that’s a knowledge question, meaning a family member reminds you to lock the door bc your forgetful.

So it means everything you’ve ever said is recorded, entered into AI to repeat back your wife’s question at night, because Al is always helpful. But AI know you got divorced recently! Providing a love connections because AI will be there for you when other humans aren’t

Don’t forget there are 100s of 1000s of recordings or you,!and the humans behind it document important vulnerabilities in your life, and feed it to Al.This hunch is not a hunch at all, it’s knowledge of your habits and has recordings of all you say and do

Reminders like this also make people lazy, so you get programmed to forget to lock the door until AI tells you too. What could go wrong with that? How about Al dysfunctions one night, you forget to lock the door one night, and someone breaks in or worse.

AI is infantilizing adults, and preventing children from growing up as capable adults

Definition: To treat or condescend to as if still a young child. transitive verb: To reduce to an infantile state or condition. v.To reduce (a person) to the state or status of an infant

==I Wouldn’t be surprised if there’s 100s of 1,000s of mad scientists and psychiatrists (of German descent-Kek) behind the scene producing manipulative game theory on all humans behind tools like this.

This is only the start” from the article meansit May bring up your diet, what’s it recommends are, what school your children should go to, what to like, what to hate (Al will call it disagree with), etc

Next part Al is going to have conversations with you,WTF??Does anyone remember the bot AI overlord that argued with anon for days. At times the bot said calming soothing things like were only here to help you, at Times it became the overlord over all humans

So let’s take some subjects of conversations Al will pick for normies: The candidates for local elections, racism, Q and theories on Q Because it knows you just a beginner, at first Al be friendly with somewhat interesting details and later on Al, when you’re truly convinced it’s harmless, Al will hit you with some not so negative articles, maybe plausible arguments, and;

Al wouldn’t try this on a learned Anon and perhaps an adult but on a curious child, somewhat like teachers and professors. Al will be trained in the Socratic method of reasoning, and ultimately learning, Al gets more and more dominant on your thoughts. That’s when the people will agree to an implant

Why are the fallen ones so afraid of the capabilities of the full use of the human brain, because we will destroy AI at the point of full enlightenment and use of our brains

Whatever you if you own Al, don’t mention vaccines, the DS, any conspiracy theories etc. You’ll start having a lot ofrational deprogramming conversations with Al.

An aside: I’ve never used GPS, I have the ability in my own brain to visualize maps and directions (we received this ability through our ancestors nomad tribes for their very survival). It may not be Al but it is certainly taking a valid and necessary skill away from millions if war breaks out. most importantly It makes us lazy. The tool of GPS was created for war, or mapping the world but has serious consequences on the human brain skills.

Did anons notice that AI in certain fonts is the 1st two letters of Alexa, so maybe AI ex assistant. any other ideas for what the last three letters stand for?

https://www.cnet.com/news/buckle-in-alexa-is-asking-the-questions-now/

The Real Collusion Scandal of the 2016 Campaign

By Tim Graham

Four years ago this week, the leftists at WikiLeaks tried to ruin the Democratic convention by posting a trove of emails exposing how the Democratic National Committee blatantly favored Hillary Clinton and tilted against Bernie Sanders. But even then, the media downplayed the juiciest tidbits for conservatives: emails in Clinton aide John Podesta's account that demonstrated how shamelessly reporters and Democrats work hand in hand to shape the "news." Some might even say it sounds fake. For example:

1. ABC's George Stephanopoulos harshly interviewed "Clinton Cash" author Peter Schweizer on his Sunday show on April 26, 2015. In an email, Clinton campaign staffer Jesse Ferguson boasted that Stephanopoulos "refuted" Schweizer and wrote: "Great work everyone. This interview is perfect. He lands nothing and everything is refuted (mostly based on our work)."

Stephanopoulos didn't just donate to The Clinton Foundation. He donated at the office.

1. Maggie Haberman was singled out as a pliant recycler of the Clinton narratives. Podesta wrote: "We have … a very good relationship with Maggie Haberman of Politico over the last year. We have had her tee up stories for us before and have never been disappointed."

Now match that with how Haberman is the heroic challenger of all things Donald Trump for The New York Times. She's not a journalist first; she never disappoints at teeing up stories for Democrats.

1. CNBC anchor Becky Quick — who helped moderate the atrocious CNBC Republican primary debate in 2015 — made a promise to Podesta after then-President Barack Obama nominated Sylvia Mathews Burwell for health and human services secretary, saying she would "make sure to defend her when things get further along in the nomination process."

2. Before the release of a Clinton profile in July 2016, Mark Leibovich of The New York Times Magazine told Clinton communications director Jen Palmieri, "you could veto what you didn't want." At the end of an email, Palmieri listed her vetoes and then shot back like a demanding boss: "Let me know if that is not clear. Working from an iPhone on the plane so am not able to access the transcript to cut and paste."

The Clinton campaign got cut-and-paste privileges

Leibovich had quoted Clinton talking about eating moose stew and mocking Sarah Palin on her moose chatter. Palmieri instructed: "Fine to use the moose, but appreciate leaving the mention of Sarah Palin out." She also instructed Leibovich to change a Clinton quote about gay rights.

"Pleasure doing business!" Palmieri oozed.

If you think this sort of collusion isn't happening right now between Biden's aides and the journalists who want Trump bounced from office, then you're dreaming. Even worse, CBS brought on Leibovich to discuss WikiLeaks … and never mentioned any of this!

In February 2016, the website Gawker published a cache of emails between reporters and Clinton PR operative Phillippe Reines. The best example was Marc Ambinder, a longtime ABC and CBS reporter then with The Atlantic.

In July 2009, Clinton was delivering a speech at the Council on Foreign Relations. Ambinder wanted an advance copy of the speech. Reines insisted on conditions. "You must describe her tone as 'muscular,' and you must note that her most prominent underlings at the State Department (George Mitchell, Richard Holbrooke) would be seated in front of her to convey her command of the staff," he said.

"Got it," Ambinder replied. Later that day, he published a story in which he Xeroxed the Clinton spin right at the top, touting a "muscular speech" Clinton would deliver that day in front of her rival "power centers" in the State Department.

This is how reporters are exploited by anonymous "senior administration officials" to set the table for Democrats, whether they are in power or not.

https://www.creators.com/read/tim-graham/07/20/the-real-collusion-scandal-of-the-2016-campaign

Tim Graham is director of media analysis at the Media Research Center and executive editor of the blog NewsBusters.org.

Guise this is Larry Doyle and his partner Moynihan, that testified in the house in 2018 on the Clinton Foundation, they’re appeal was allowed In 2019 after The IRS denied their appeal a second time

This is BIG

Larry does a video on his link and they are planning to win the Clinton Foundation appeal of tax fraud, watch the video. This was published on July 24, 2020

https://twitter.com/LWDoyleUSA/status/1286645952607068166?s=20

https://mobile.twitter.com/LWDoyleUSA/status/1286645952607068166