>>10080120
Apparently a dam on another river was deliberately blown. Lost track of the name but was about 4-5 breads back. Fields flooded, people floating face down.
Up until a few minutes ago, 3G livestream was still up. It's down, now.
>>10080120
Apparently a dam on another river was deliberately blown. Lost track of the name but was about 4-5 breads back. Fields flooded, people floating face down.
Up until a few minutes ago, 3G livestream was still up. It's down, now.
Is there any chance that western state governments will ever figure out that Antifa bad?
Well, I've been here since 11 am. It is now nearly 2 am. I'm not going back to find the source for what was an answer to a specific question. If you can't be bothered to suss it out, neither can I.
Thank you. But that dam I read about earlier had a different name.
Why would I care?
There is a strong possibility that the video is on a 24 hr loop. There was debate pro / con about that yesterday. But there is a loud noise that occurs at 55 second intervals that strongly suggests that the audio is looped.
IF the dam fails, I'm not certain that we would know a moment before anyone else. Someone says they saw a crane move (arguing that the video is not on a loop) but the veracity of that claim is uncertain.
What fake video?Buh bye, shill. Anons don't set out to pick fights and that is what you have done.
I'm not sure where the word "suss" comes from … I think it might be Yiddish … but it serves as an alternative to "ferret". If you don't know what it means to ferret something out, then you probably shouldn't be here.
The same one you gave me.
What did the rest of that sentence say?
"… without the tools to do so in a safe way."
Moot at this point … a court told city hall to shove it up their asses.
Would you ask any of those others to do their jobs without the tools to do them?
There are other outlets for socialization, but that is the least of their education. IMHO
Put your anger to one side. READ what the notice says. He was specifically stating that he wasn't going to risk lives defending PROPERTY without access to less-lethal weapons.
They still have their sidearms, ARs and stuff, but, since breaking a window isn't a capital crime, they weren't going to concern themselves with property damage.
That's what I read. YMMV
We had some AI posters about a year ago. They wrote the same way you do.