Anonymous ID: 529a05 July 26, 2020, 12:54 a.m. No.10080761   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0781

>>10080748

Anons can read the Beast or MSN or HuffPost anytime.

That article is nothing but misleading information.

I'm not certain how that would be notable.

Anon could have connected it with something or gone into detail, but just sharing a Fake News article and calling it Notable is Questionable.

But if you're the baker, I do appreciate your efforts.

Anonymous ID: 529a05 July 26, 2020, 1:20 a.m. No.10080864   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10080781

>discernment will come, show him

Thought that's what I was doing…

Didn't realize it was a newbaker.

MIGHT have tried to be a little polite.

But MSN? Notable?

With no digs refuting the Fake News?

YOU ARE THE NEWS.

The World is Watching.

Handle w/ care.

Or something like that.

Carry on.

Repeat to Baker(s): You are appreciated.

That goes for some of you anons too.