Nunes looking at Brookings Institute
Devin broke the Steele dossier into 3 investigative categories, and linking a single groups to all three could show a known conspiracy, as opposed to a group being tricked. Proving a single party was involved all three areas highlights them as ultra complicit. In the game of dirty tricks plausible deniability is achieved by separating the functions, but with the Dossier certain players likely conspired to create the hoax and push it out and later defend it, that shows the 'knowingly' part and make it a broad conspiracy.
1- Development
2- Dissemination
3- Defense
Nunes stated Brookings took part in 2 and 3, and wants to investigate and links to 1 (development)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brookings_Institution
worth a dig for anyone interested- seems like a typical global ds/cabal org, tax funding/grants, for hire credibility establishment (for hoaxes), cfr links, foundations, ngos, etc.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Brookings-Institution
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/brookings-institute/
https://www.brookings.edu/
https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Brookings_Institution