Anonymous ID: 7a137a July 26, 2020, 8:43 a.m. No.10082670   🗄️.is 🔗kun

The Ryun amendment concerning pedophiles was in 2005 then in 2006 he is hosting a block party with a pedo?

 

Judge Whipple clearly ignored the law's intent and contradicted well-established case law addressing this issue," said Ryun. "Jan Helder was ignorant of the fact that he was communicating with a law enforcement officer, but his ignorance is no defense. Judge Whipple's decision twists the statute in a way that defies not only past precedent—but also common sense."

 

"In short, this amendment is about protecting our children," said Ryun. "If Judge Whipple's decision stands, it will undermine the ability of law enforcement to police the Internet."

 

The Ryun Amendment passed as part of HR 3132, the Children's Safety Act of 2005, which passed the House by a vote of 371 to 52.

 

http://www.ryun.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=34428

 

https://votesmart.org/public-statement/126429/ryun-passes-amendment-condemning-helder-decision

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Ryun