>>10084023lb
>>>10083395
>This didn't start with Q, stupid. Your analysts are basing their models on the assumption that the masses cannot generate a data set based on empiricism. The whole point has always been an attempt to reconcile a contrast between what we are told and what is. Even if you raised an entire generation in confinement with no reality to compare your description to, you would be unable to invent so false a description as to inspire a solid reality construct in the influenced mind.
If there are ANY remaining smartypants ‘intel’ people lurking here, and you’re not busy looking for you bugout bag heading to your bolt hole, and still want to try and redeem any of your co-workers… beg them to get their head around this. It’s why you’ve failed.